![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Gallery | Webcams | Blogs | YouTube Channel | Classifieds | Register | FAQ | Members List | Donate | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: NH
Posts: 2,689
Thanks: 33
Thanked 439 Times in 249 Posts
|
The "come for a test next week" law, was kind of a joke, right? If you were going to fail the test, you could always add mufflers for the test.
If this fixed the problem and now the boat was quiet, then great the law works. But some people would "borrow" mufflers for the test and a few days later be back to loud. The new law allows a standing still test at idle. But can they do this on the spot? Or do they still need to schedule a test? Personally I think there are two situations: A boat comes from the factory with an exhaust system, the factory certifies that it produces a certain noise level. If this noise level is under the limits then done deal. If you modify your exhaust, then you become the factory. You should have to have it measured before you put it on the lake. |
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Fort Myers FL / Moultonboro
Posts: 1,045
Thanks: 444
Thanked 574 Times in 178 Posts
|
Quote:
__________________
Have you had your Vessel Inspected Yet? |
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to OCDACTIVE For This Useful Post: | ||
BroadHopper (08-20-2009) | ||
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Hudson - NH
Posts: 408
Thanks: 233
Thanked 212 Times in 88 Posts
|
"The "come for a test next week" law, was kind of a joke, right? If you were going to fail the test, you could always add mufflers for the test." partial quote from JRC
Yes you are right. A few years ago the marine patrol had compassion for my friend and did allow him time to replace his mufflers then get certified. I am not seeing this as a bad thing but a type of "back to humanity" approach. A compromise starts with reactions that are not hardened. There was no danger present so maybe it was appropriate to allow time to adjust the problem. Now the art of compromise is a more difinitive win / loose proposition. We are debating specific hard values. This seems the only way laws are created. It seems that we no longer value the intent of the law but inforce the technicality of it and the process. I hope the state stops and refudiates any further attempts of certain people to short cut the two year data collection and then evaluation process. |
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|