![]() |
![]() |
|
Home | Forums | Gallery | Webcams | Blogs | YouTube Channel | Classifieds | Register | FAQ | Members List | Donate | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Moultonborough and FL
Posts: 459
Thanks: 318
Thanked 123 Times in 53 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to VtSteve For This Useful Post: | ||
Irrigation Guy (08-16-2010) |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 332
Thanks: 0
Thanked 51 Times in 26 Posts
|
![]()
The simple answer to the problem is to kill the birds. Federally protected? Yes they are. The offspring from this year will return agin next year and the next generation will repeat itself over and over. Manage them now before they kill our ecosystem.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Moultonborough and FL
Posts: 459
Thanks: 318
Thanked 123 Times in 53 Posts
|
![]()
Is federally protected for both birds that migrate and birds that do not migrate? There was some question as to if these geese were federally protected? Do they migrate?
|
![]() |
![]() |
Sponsored Links |
|
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Coral Gables, winter; Long Island, summer
Posts: 1,361
Thanks: 959
Thanked 575 Times in 300 Posts
|
![]()
It seems pretty clear with a little "googling" that all Canada Geese are protected by Federal Law whether "resident" or not.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Senior Member
|
![]() Quote:
Those that seek protection always count some very minimal amount for studies. This can lead to endangered species classification. But many times, artificial protection is kept up well after the population soars. We have the same problem here with protected Cormorants. Many times, species like these are just fine, until someone decides there simply aren't enough around. When there are too many around, these people suddenly vanish. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Coral Gables, winter; Long Island, summer
Posts: 1,361
Thanks: 959
Thanked 575 Times in 300 Posts
|
![]()
You may well have a valid point. I was just trying to answer the question of Federal protection. Not so sure about the manatees, but that discussion is off topic.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Moultonborough
Posts: 2,920
Thanks: 342
Thanked 1,693 Times in 595 Posts
|
![]()
An argument could be made that, after being fed by humans, they are no longer migratory.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,139
Thanks: 223
Thanked 319 Times in 181 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
It prevents any one state from opening a 20 bag limit on a species that is just stopping by for a few weeks. IMO this system needs an update for specific species and not a broad based reform of the practice. As some species of water fowl are far more sought after than others and could lead to certian species numbers being damaged beyond repair. Mostly regarding ducks than geese. The duck stamp provides you access to all open species of waterfowl in a particular state. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|