![]() |
![]() |
|
Home | Forums | Gallery | Webcams | Blogs | YouTube Channel | Classifieds | Register | FAQ | Donate | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#8 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Florida (Sebring & Keys), Wolfeboro
Posts: 5,941
Thanks: 2,213
Thanked 778 Times in 554 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Fosters.com writes this excerpt: Quote:
![]() ![]() 2) In addition, below are items on NHRBA's own mission-statement from the website GraniteGrok. 3) In your consideration of the Erica's hugely-discredited NHRBA, how do these "talking points" differ from those of the brand-new SBONH? ![]() ______________________________ ______________________________ NHRBA: 1) Issues of current laws not being followed or enforced (headway speeds, 150 foot passage rule), 2) lack of statistics showing [speed] is a problem, 3) personal responsibility vs insistence on personal rights (kayaking in the middle of the Broads). 4) The role of mandatory boating education classes and certifications. 5) Freedom vs encroaching Nanny Statism. 6) Cost of enforcement. 7) Different boats are built for different speeds. 8) Class envy. 9) Would removal of performance boats cut down the chop experienced by small craft? 10) Noise problems 11) Accidents in the state wholly due to speed in the State (not alcohol related)? Zero. ______________________________ Other than jabbing sticks into quiet areas of New Hampshire law, I fail to see how SBONH has accomplished any mission separation from Erica's hugely-discredited NHRBA. ![]() |
||
![]() |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|