Go Back   Winnipesaukee Forum > Winnipesaukee Forums > General Discussion
Home Forums Gallery Webcams Blogs YouTube Channel Classifieds Register FAQ Members List Donate Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-12-2011, 05:26 PM   #1
fatlazyless
Senior Member
 
fatlazyless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 8,916
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 305
Thanked 1,052 Times in 766 Posts
Default

Property tax payers in Waterville Valley can maybe breath a sigh of relief if the donor town system has really been put to rest.

Waterville Valley has a small elementary school with grades k-8, and spends over $26,000/student/year, and the school has a big banner out front announcing it just won the highest academics/ NH elementary for reading and math in NH or something like that.

With all the non-resident condos and homes, each individual student must have about 50-million dollars of assessed property value on a per student basis, and it could be that the school actually has more teachers and staff than students? Every elementary student gets their own teacher(s), guidance councilor, administrative assistant, driver, and ski/tennis coach.

Rich or poor, students are probably better off in a rich town!
__________________
.... Banned for life from local thrift store!
fatlazyless is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2011, 07:42 PM   #2
Pineedles
Senior Member
 
Pineedles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Moultonborough & CT
Posts: 2,549
Thanks: 1,074
Thanked 672 Times in 369 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fatlazyless View Post
Rich or poor, students are probably better off in a rich town!
That's why we have law suits that create magnet schools. Your statements indicate that you must be joking.

"50-million dollars of assessed property value on a per student basis"

Come on, be real.
Pineedles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2011, 08:05 PM   #3
fatlazyless
Senior Member
 
fatlazyless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 8,916
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 305
Thanked 1,052 Times in 766 Posts
Default

I betcha in an uneducated guess that the actual dollar amount for assessed property value/per student is somewhere between 25 and 50 million/per student. The school, grades k-8, has only maybe 30-students, and Waterville Valley has something like 1100 condos and 150 private homes, a golf course, a tennis center, an athletic club, a small retail square, plus a ski area that was just purchased for 12-million dollars or so. Do the math?
__________________
.... Banned for life from local thrift store!
fatlazyless is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2011, 10:23 AM   #4
Argie's Wife
Senior Member
 
Argie's Wife's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Alton
Posts: 1,908
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 533
Thanked 579 Times in 260 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fatlazyless View Post
Property tax payers in Waterville Valley can maybe breath a sigh of relief if the donor town system has really been put to rest.

Waterville Valley has a small elementary school with grades k-8, and spends over $26,000/student/year, and the school has a big banner out front announcing it just won the highest academics/ NH elementary for reading and math in NH or something like that.

With all the non-resident condos and homes, each individual student must have about 50-million dollars of assessed property value on a per student basis, and it could be that the school actually has more teachers and staff than students? Every elementary student gets their own teacher(s), guidance councilor, administrative assistant, driver, and ski/tennis coach.

Rich or poor, students are probably better off in a rich town!
You're missing the one major fact here: there's only about 30-33 students in this school system (it's a K-8 school.) The teacher to student ratio is 1:8 - the State average is 1:12. Their spending is almost $10,000 more per student than the state average. I have to wonder why they don't send the students to a private school, another district, or whathaveyou - I'd think it was cheaper.

Their banner is celebrating their success of high scores on NECAP testings - which determines if the school will make Annual Yearly Progress (AYP). In a school population that small, one student failing the test can bring down the whole school's rating.

What's not stated in your post about that district, is that their 9-12 students are tuition out to Pemi-Baker Cooperative in (Plymouth Regional).

WVSD would receive federal tax money revenue because 9% of their students receive free or reduced lunch. The property tax rate in that town is like $11.38 (2009) - not bad.

And rich or poor.... if you're basing the NECAP test scores on success it really doesn't matter. The way No Child Left Behind is set up in NH (and remember - each state has their own way to measure progress) - all schools will fail to meet the level of Proficient by 2014 because all students (100%) will be expected to be Proficient. The program does not take into account that there are some students that will work their hardest and do their very best - and only be able to achieve a C or a D. The tests are a one-size fit-all type of test and are given ONE day. There's no chance for a re-take, make up test, etc. (SAT's, The Bar Exam, etc. - can all be taken again if someone fails - not the NECAP!) And the NECAP test is a New England based test - there's five other states' standards included on it. NH bought into it to save money because No Child Left Behind is underfunded - to the tune of about $12 billion.
Argie's Wife is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Argie's Wife For This Useful Post:
Pineedles (02-14-2011)
Old 02-14-2011, 03:40 PM   #5
SIKSUKR
Senior Member
 
SIKSUKR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,075
Thanks: 215
Thanked 903 Times in 509 Posts
Default

Facts? We don't need no stinkin facts AW!
__________________
SIKSUKR
SIKSUKR is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 02-14-2011, 05:20 PM   #6
robmac
Senior Member
 
robmac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Nashua,Meredith
Posts: 951
Thanks: 213
Thanked 106 Times in 81 Posts
Default

While I have a school aged child and believe money spent on education is very important, I not only don't want nor can I afford my tax dollars to be sent out of my city. Simple math I am making less now than I was 3 years ago yet my tax burden is higher. I have paid these taxes longer than I have had a school aged child and salaries of teachers is growing at a rate higher in my community than the average. It is important our children get a quality education our school districts must also tighten their belts as we have and work within a budget. JMHO
robmac is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

This page was generated in 0.27152 seconds