![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Gallery | Webcams | Blogs | YouTube Channel | Classifieds | Register | FAQ | Members List | Donate | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: North Shore, MA
Posts: 1,358
Thanks: 996
Thanked 314 Times in 164 Posts
|
CLA,
I believe the difference is related to "unintended couples" in the leads. Before I retired, almost seven years ago now, I was involved in engineering management for a large company. We used thermocouples in many applications. When we had questions about accuracy and unusual readings, it almost always came down to the leads. Here is some technical information that might help: http://www.picotech.com/applications/thermocouple.html Thanks for all you do! R2B |
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Resident 2B For This Useful Post: | ||
CanisLupusArctos (01-23-2012) | ||
|
|
#2 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Center Harbor
Posts: 1,049
Thanks: 15
Thanked 472 Times in 107 Posts
|
Quote:
You're welcome. And thank you for the info. I just realized something: The other probe, at 2 feet, began reading 5 degrees too high, last year. I put the 10-foot probe in about a year after the 2-foot one. So, when each probe reached a certain age (the same for both) it began misreading. I tested the 2-foot probe and found it to be 5 degrees too high. The computer corrects it with a script that subtracts 5, and I can change that number if I need to. If I assume the 10-foot probe is reading low by the same amount, that brings the actual temperature to 35 degrees instead of its current reading of 30. 35 is what it's almost always shown during lake ice season. The lowest I ever remember it going was 34. Your thoughts? |
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to CanisLupusArctos For This Useful Post: | ||
trfour (01-23-2012) | ||
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|