![]() |
![]() |
|
Home | Forums | Gallery | Webcams | Blogs | YouTube Channel | Classifieds | Register | FAQ | Donate | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,075
Thanks: 215
Thanked 903 Times in 509 Posts
|
![]()
I'm not sure these leagal ranglings can be compared between razing costs and lawyers.If I understand whats going on here its whether or not the insurance with pay out or not based on whether the fire was arson or another cause.Much bigger dollars at stake for recovery of insurance than trying to undermind an arson finding.
__________________
SIKSUKR |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 56
Thanks: 0
Thanked 48 Times in 21 Posts
|
![]()
As I understand it the insurance comapny is not paying because the owners failed to meet the terms of the insurance companies requirements on the building. One of which was as I understand it having a fully sprinkled building. Only the 1st floor had sprinkler protection.
|
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to jtb9212 For This Useful Post: | ||
SIKSUKR (05-23-2012) |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: the left coast (Portland)and West Alton
Posts: 1,415
Thanks: 65
Thanked 260 Times in 178 Posts
|
![]()
The suit was brought by the owners of the property who are understandably worried about why it is taking so long for the Fire Marshall to finish the investigation.
Their key concern is for their own hides, not tearing the building down. Be patient, I see a "happy ending..." |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to Mr. V For This Useful Post: | ||
nhyitbos (05-24-2012) |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|