Go Back   Winnipesaukee Forum > Winnipesaukee Forums > Getting Here
Home Forums Gallery Webcams Blogs YouTube Channel Classifieds Register FAQ Members List Donate Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-03-2013, 11:20 AM   #1
HellRaZoR004
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Litchfield/Gilford
Posts: 828
Thanks: 233
Thanked 224 Times in 131 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fatlazyless View Post
The minimum legal speed limit on Route 93 is 45-mph but going that slow even in the right hand lane is a hazard and it makes other drivers angry......some will honk or flip you the digital salute....so now the minimum will be 45....and the maximum will be 70.....so probably the minimum 45 should be raised too.

Going just 45...even though legal...... can get get you stopped by a cop who suspects that you ..... "... say, why so slow, buddy?" ... are drunk.
I agree with FLL here, someone going 45 MPH is potentially causing a dangerous situation. Passing by someone at a speed of 25 MPH or more might startle the other driver or even make the person overtaking look reckless when they weave from one lane to the next and back while maintaining the original speed.
HellRaZoR004 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2013, 12:25 PM   #2
Dave R
Senior Member
 
Dave R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,985
Thanks: 246
Thanked 744 Times in 444 Posts
Default

I think it's a good move in the right direction. I suspect that the de facto speed limit of 75 MPH will not increase to 80 MPH for quite some time though, so for most people, nothing will really change.

I wish they'd address the absurdly low limits and lack of passing zones on our back roads. 35 to 40 MPH limits on roads like 107, 132, 175 etc. makes no sense unless it's snowing. This is the only area in the country that seems to set limits like that.
Dave R is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2013, 02:17 PM   #3
Phantom
Senior Member
 
Phantom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Berlin, Ma / Gilford
Posts: 1,934
Thanks: 450
Thanked 605 Times in 341 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave R View Post
I think it's a good move in the right direction. I suspect that the de facto speed limit of 75 MPH will not increase to 80 MPH for quite some time though, so for most people, nothing will really change.
.
It all depends on where the State Police set their "Trigger" point ... 76, 78 or 81mph

Currently I am not aware of ANY state highway where they don't give you at least 4-5mph over posted limit


.
__________________
A bad day on the Big Lake (although I've never had one) - Still beats a day at the office!!
Phantom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2013, 02:26 PM   #4
SIKSUKR
Senior Member
 
SIKSUKR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,075
Thanks: 215
Thanked 903 Times in 509 Posts
Default

The interstate highway was designed for 75 mph travel.Methinks people forgot when that was the speed limit way back when.The cars certainly have become safer in that time.The reduction in speeds was not imposed because of safety but for fuel safings during the gas crisis of the late 70's-early 80's.
__________________
SIKSUKR
SIKSUKR is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to SIKSUKR For This Useful Post:
AC2717 (07-03-2013)
Old 07-03-2013, 02:35 PM   #5
SIKSUKR
Senior Member
 
SIKSUKR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,075
Thanks: 215
Thanked 903 Times in 509 Posts
Default The governors take on the SL change

‘‘We must always be cautious when considering speed-limit increases in order to maintain the safety of our citizens and of visitors using our highways,’’ Hassan said in a statement. ‘‘The limited nature of the 5 mile-per-hour speed-limit increase in a targeted region of the state, along with the overwhelming, bipartisan support for the measure, makes me comfortable with signing this measure into law, bringing the speed limit more in line with the habits of our rural travelers.’’

More in line with habits of our rural travelers?Interesting spin governor but I'm glad you succumbed to the overwhelming support of this change.
__________________
SIKSUKR
SIKSUKR is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 07-03-2013, 02:43 PM   #6
Happy Gourmand
Senior Member
 
Happy Gourmand's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Ruskin FL
Posts: 1,027
Thanks: 188
Thanked 322 Times in 179 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SIKSUKR View Post
The interstate highway was designed for 75 mph travel.Methinks people forgot when that was the speed limit way back when.The cars certainly have become safer in that time.The reduction in speeds was not imposed because of safety but for fuel safings during the gas crisis of the late 70's-early 80's.
Correct, but this all before the invention of the cell phone and texting, but that a whole other story...
Happy Gourmand is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

This page was generated in 0.22181 seconds