![]() |
![]() |
|
Home | Forums | Gallery | Webcams | Blogs | YouTube Channel | Classifieds | Register | FAQ | Donate | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,985
Thanks: 246
Thanked 744 Times in 444 Posts
|
![]()
If you commute on that route every work day for 10 years, that will add up to more than two days. I'd rather spend two days at the lake instead of driving on 93.
|
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to Dave R For This Useful Post: | ||
pjard (07-08-2013) |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Clayton,NC / Sanbornton,NH
Posts: 611
Thanks: 126
Thanked 137 Times in 75 Posts
|
![]()
That or when you are at the end of a 14 hour trip it would be nice to shave off 36 seconds of being in the truck.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: chester nh
Posts: 93
Thanks: 54
Thanked 37 Times in 20 Posts
|
![]()
55mph was set to save fuel when all cars were carburated...With everything now fuel injected,the higher speed will actually increase or not affect fuel economy....SPEED DOES NOT KILL,,, PEOPLE DO............
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Under the former KNHZ bounce pattern
Posts: 501
Thanks: 4
Thanked 212 Times in 115 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Litchfield/Gilford
Posts: 828
Thanks: 233
Thanked 224 Times in 131 Posts
|
![]()
TMI Guy is correct. There is a sweet spot for all vehicles and once you go over that you have higher RPMs and more aerodynamic drag (i.e. wind resistance).
|
![]() |
![]() |
Sponsored Links |
|
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Piscataway, NJ
Posts: 1,030
Thanks: 2
Thanked 46 Times in 24 Posts
|
![]()
I don't think most drivers today can handle 70MPH. The cars can do it but the drivers are another issue. What will happen if an animal wants to cross the road and a car is coming up on it at that speed?
![]() But the lake has a speed limit, go figure. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 620
Thanks: 259
Thanked 158 Times in 100 Posts
|
![]()
Depends if the animal is a moose or a squirral.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Thornton's Ferry
Posts: 1,307
Thanks: 67
Thanked 172 Times in 128 Posts
|
![]()
It's called reverse psychology. Do you see the folks that are already going 75? Maybe now they'll figure that an extra 5mph isn't worth a ticket like 10mph over used to be.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Center Harbor
Posts: 1,173
Thanks: 206
Thanked 437 Times in 253 Posts
|
![]()
People tend to drive the speed they are comfortable at. If most people are already driving 70 - 75 MPH they are probably not going to increase by much, if at all.
I tend to target 72/73 MPH but would probably push it up to at least 75 with the new limit. I feel perfectly comfortable at that speed and even higher. Yes, you have a little less time to react in an emergency situation but at high speeds the time is already reduced. The impact of a collision could be a little worse but the impact of a 65MPH crash is already probably fatal. Of course if you are uncomfortable at 70 MPH just stay in the right lane so I can pass you. Thanks. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: CT & Moultonboro NH
Posts: 27
Thanks: 14
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
|
![]()
Let's be serious
This speed in todays cars is sate at not only 70 - but easily 80 mph. Over 10 years at thes speeds you can add an extra few months to your life not wasted on some freeway. We shouldn't be setting our speed limits to the lowest common denominator. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Lakes Region
Posts: 1,321
Thanks: 282
Thanked 287 Times in 169 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
So, do you want your 17 year old daughter that just got their license to see an 80 MPH limit and think the car is built for that and therefore go for it? Errrr... not me, thanks. They have these drag chips, wonder if they have governor chips, I can think of a majority of people that need these..... |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,985
Thanks: 246
Thanked 744 Times in 444 Posts
|
![]()
Modern cars, light trucks, and motorcycles are perfectly safe at 80 MPH, there's nothing to worry about. Much of the civilized world (including the western US) has been operating at those speeds for years. Big trucks are a big worry at 80 MPH though. Loaded up, it takes them a LOOOOOONG time to stop from 80. The government is trying to do something about it, but the latest safety standard for big rig braking distance is 60-0 in 250 feet (or 310 feet depending on GVWR) which is double the distance a sporty car or motorcycle requires for the same deceleration. Bear in mind, this standard only applies to new trucks. Older trucks typically require 355 feet to stop from 60.
If you want to worry about your 17 year old daughter going 80 MPH, worry that she can keep going 80 MPH so that big rig behind her does not occupy the same space she is in... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Alton Bay
Posts: 5,602
Blog Entries: 2
Thanks: 2,466
Thanked 1,983 Times in 1,083 Posts
|
![]()
Draw you own conclusions...as they say, it is a rough estimate.
http://forensicdynamics.com/stopping-distance-calculator As some have said that they do 70 when the speed limit is 65, it maybe reasonable to assume that with the limit raised to 70, they may up their speed to 75. In a section of Interstate where there are moose populations, that resulting increase in speed, by the calculator, would add over 30 ft to stopping distance. This 30 ft could be difference between "Boy that was close" and "Hey Bullwinkle, get outta my car!!!!" ![]() Just another side to consider.
__________________
I Live Here... I am always UPTHESAUKEE !!!! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Moultonboro, NH
Posts: 2,932
Thanks: 478
Thanked 694 Times in 389 Posts
|
![]()
KE=1/2MVsquared
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Ruskin FL
Posts: 1,027
Thanks: 188
Thanked 322 Times in 179 Posts
|
![]()
What's the big deal with 70 MPH. We drive up from Nashua and except for a couple stretches in Manchester and Concord, I set my cruise control at 72 to 73 MPH. At that speed, I'm hardly ever in the passing lane as the traffic is blowing by me. The cars are safer, tires are made better, roads can easily handle the speed.
Wasn't the speed limit 70 MPH years ago on the NH highways? The biggest problem I see is cars weaving from lane to lane as drivers send and receive text messages on their phones. I think that is a more serious problem than speed. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,597
Thanks: 153
Thanked 229 Times in 166 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Clayton,NC / Sanbornton,NH
Posts: 611
Thanks: 126
Thanked 137 Times in 75 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|