Go Back   Winnipesaukee Forum > Winnipesaukee Forums > General Discussion
Home Forums Gallery Webcams Blogs YouTube Channel Classifieds Register FAQ Members List Donate Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 01-31-2016, 01:52 PM   #36
TiltonBB
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Gilford, NH and Florida
Posts: 3,065
Thanks: 726
Thanked 2,236 Times in 956 Posts
Default Different viewpoint

Quote:
Originally Posted by MAXUM View Post
1. So this is what happens when you have a portion of the population that is out to get something for nothing. Even worse, there are ample number of dirt bag lawyers that will take these cases.


2. Dare I ask where are those same protections for the citizens?
Interesting take.

1. I would not automatically assume that someone is trying to get "something for nothing". Some claims are very legitimate. To simplify DFI: If someone trips and falls on a sidewalk in Concord, and the city had considered fixing the sidewalk but not done so (instead deciding to spend their resources on other municipal needs) the city could use DFI as a defense to claim that in their discretion the money was better spent elsewhere.

2. Some people would say that this is the "protection for the citizens" because the reduction in claim settlements saves the citizens money and only negatively affects one person, the claimant.
TiltonBB is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

This page was generated in 3.32135 seconds