![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Gallery | Webcams | Blogs | YouTube Channel | Classifieds | Register | FAQ | Members List | Donate | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Litchfield/Gilford
Posts: 828
Thanks: 233
Thanked 224 Times in 131 Posts
|
24 feet is large? I think you need a reality check.
Go watch some of the recent wind wave videos this year and tell me they aren't causing as much or more damage. |
|
|
|
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to HellRaZoR004 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Moultonborough
Posts: 2,937
Thanks: 349
Thanked 1,708 Times in 602 Posts
|
Speaking of large wakes.....I'm amazed at the size of the wakes produced by the wake board boats.They are designed with to take on extra weight in the ballast tanks and it keeps them on 3/4 plane.
Wakes appear to be 3' to 4' |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Maynard, MA & Paugus Bay
Posts: 2,616
Thanks: 756
Thanked 369 Times in 277 Posts
|
they can add ballast (pump in water to ballast tanks) to their hulls to create wakes, some have multiple tanks
__________________
Capt. of the "No Worries" |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Maynard, MA & Paugus Bay
Posts: 2,616
Thanks: 756
Thanked 369 Times in 277 Posts
|
I really think the problem is that the NWZ here is way too long and so people try to get speed as far as they can so it does not take them 10 minutes to get to the docks. there really is no reason for an area of that size to have a no wake zone in the first place, I think those proposing the larger nwz are being undone by their own doing in the first place with the large one they already have and most would not have a problem if they actually pushed back the NWZ further into the bay say the church landing point over to just past the little island
__________________
Capt. of the "No Worries" |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: In the hills
Posts: 2,419
Thanks: 1,664
Thanked 786 Times in 466 Posts
|
Quote:
There's no way it takes 10 min to reach the docks at headway speed...it only takes 9! ![]() I have been there and approaching the docks and have had people cruise by me to attempt to get there first...obviously, doing faster than headway. I just shake my head... Last edited by Hillcountry; 09-02-2016 at 05:43 PM. |
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Hillcountry For This Useful Post: | ||
ApS (09-01-2016) | ||
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Merrimack and Welch Island
Posts: 4,600
Thanks: 1,419
Thanked 1,705 Times in 1,109 Posts
|
Complaining here won't change much If you really want change:
1. Contact your local rep/senator to require speed limit changes, NRZ, etc. by the legislature, not the Commissioner of Safety. 2. Mandate that hearings be held in July/August, not September 30 3. Mandate that at least two hearings be held, 12 months apart There is no reason that those who are complaining about the size of the Meredith NWZ can't file a petition to reduce the NWZ to some other size and produce a second set of hearings and give the Commissioner pause for thought. These changes occur because the petitioners show up and the opponents do not. Simple. I don't want to re-start the issues over speed limits, but the process is the same in terms of who shows up, and who yells the loudest. Call (not email) your state Reps and Senators (candidates) instead of whining to each other. Vote on September 13. |
|
|
|
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Descant For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
#7 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 394
Thanks: 20
Thanked 131 Times in 94 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Winnisquam
Posts: 408
Thanks: 72
Thanked 115 Times in 73 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: North Shore, MA
Posts: 1,358
Thanks: 996
Thanked 314 Times in 164 Posts
|
My opinion is the Meredith NWZ should be made smaller, not larger. It is already too large and when you look at what is going on and do some thinking about what you are seeing, the only real solution is to reduce its size and to change the angle of the current NWZ line so that boats would want to come off plane farther away from the docks near MM.
R2B |
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Resident 2B For This Useful Post: | ||
AC2717 (08-31-2016) | ||
|
|
#10 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,955
Thanks: 796
Thanked 1,499 Times in 1,043 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 400
Thanks: 739
Thanked 118 Times in 59 Posts
|
We have one that goes around and around in the Barber Pole!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Moultonborough, NH
Posts: 1,515
Thanks: 394
Thanked 527 Times in 269 Posts
|
The wake board boat's wakes are absolutely horrible. Our loon chicks have been separated from their parents by these waves.We lost one chick. Not sure if the wake was the culprit or not. One of these boats resides in a residence in Green's Basin and several came in over and over during the summer to wake board in the basin. A friend will not even paddle board when they are out there. Another friend's boat was damaged. Let's not even mention the erosion to our shorelines. I have been on the lake for 60+ years and I have never seen anything like it! I think the wakes could lead to a safety problem if someone ( especially a youngster) is in the water near shore. They are like ocean waves.
|
|
|
|
| The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Greene's Basin Girl For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
#13 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Melvin village
Posts: 526
Thanks: 515
Thanked 318 Times in 150 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to chasedawg For This Useful Post: | ||
KPW (09-01-2016) | ||
|
|
#14 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,985
Thanks: 246
Thanked 744 Times in 444 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: MA
Posts: 914
Thanks: 598
Thanked 193 Times in 91 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Orion For This Useful Post: | ||
ApS (09-01-2016), Hillcountry (09-01-2016) | ||
|
|
#16 | |||
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Florida (Sebring & Keys), Wolfeboro
Posts: 6,028
Thanks: 2,285
Thanked 789 Times in 564 Posts
|
Rich:
Quote:
). The erosive effects of weekend boating with over-sized boats are clearly evident across both shorelines. On weekends, shoreline waters go from clear to turbid. Quote:
![]() TiltonBB: Quote:
![]() ![]() The dry areas to the left and under the stairway aren't slippery with algae. The darkest areas, regularly soaked by oversized wakes, got "noticed" after my knee surgery! Now, back to the wake problem elsewhere... ![]() .
__________________
Is it "Common Sense" isn't.
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Kuna ID
Posts: 2,755
Thanks: 244
Thanked 1,942 Times in 802 Posts
|
Don't know I sort of just shake my head at the content of this entire thread. If things continue on the course they seem to be taking the lake is going to end up being chopped up, sliced and diced into areas where upon entering them you'll need to bring the check list of what is "allowable" and what speed is appropriate. Is it me or can anyone else see the insanity this represents?
For cripes sake there is enough laws, rules and regulations on the books, putting up more does nothing to solve the problem so long as the enforcement piece is not exercised. There are already laws on the books for loud exhaust, liability for any damage done by the wake you leave behind, 150 passage rule, disturbing the peace, reckless operation, we even now have a speed limit and on and on. That pretty much covers every gripe about wakes, noise, speed etc.. yet that still is not enough. Does this not illustrate that laws are useless if they are not readily enforced. Simply put unless you all want a fleet of MP around every corner busting people for every little nit picky thing they do nothing is going to make you happy, or let me guess the sight of all the MP boats, the fact they may need to speed to catch somebody, or you have to listen to sirens blairing at all hours of the day is also unacceptable as well. It's a no win situation. |
|
|
|
| The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to MAXUM For This Useful Post: | ||
AC2717 (09-01-2016), BroadHopper (09-02-2016), chipj29 (09-04-2016), DEJ (09-01-2016), diz (09-01-2016), feb (09-01-2016), Grandpa Redneck (09-01-2016), Hillcountry (09-01-2016), Resident 2B (09-01-2016), Winnisquamer (09-02-2016) | ||
|
|
#18 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,075
Thanks: 215
Thanked 903 Times in 509 Posts
|
My 2 cents. The huge NW zone there is part of the problem. First, its so far across it really is missed by most except regular users. Second, its so large and far from ones destination that many "push it" as far as they can. Third, since it was created that far out it seems boats re producing bigger wakes in the MYC area. I thought this ridiculously large area was setup to with MYC in mind and is why its that far down Meredith Bay in the first place. Fourth, I have not been there in a few years but this years Bizer chart shows scattered markers that, in a straight line would go way past M Marine but stop quite a ways offshore from there. I guess looking at a Bizer chart I'd be confused where one would start headway speed if you were on the MM side. Fifth, to APS, is a 35 year old dock still supposed to be algae free? What?
__________________
SIKSUKR |
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to SIKSUKR For This Useful Post: | ||
Resident 2B (09-02-2016) | ||
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|