![]() |
![]() |
|
Home | Forums | Gallery | Webcams | Blogs | YouTube Channel | Classifieds | Register | FAQ | Members List | Donate | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Florida (Sebring & Keys), Wolfeboro
Posts: 6,019
Thanks: 2,274
Thanked 785 Times in 561 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
The lake should be for all peaceable boaters to enjoy, even the financially strapped. Last edited by ApS; 03-01-2006 at 06:13 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Southern NH
Posts: 109
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Maybe I missed it, but was anything decided? How long does it take the Senate to make a decision on something like this?
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,325
Thanks: 5
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Unfortunately, some are in fear of using the unsafe Lake and desire a speed limit to remedy their fear. Their remedy requires $$$$$ and that places a financial burden upon those financially challenged. If the MP were properly funded, the current rules, regulations, and laws would provide for a safer Lake and dispel the fears of most Lake users - the rest will require professional help to overcome their fears. Ever use a pay toilet? Sometimes life is harsh for the financially challenged. If the boaters pony-up, the swimmers (no fee required) will be able to swim without the alleged fears mentioned in the HB162 threads. As an after thought, it never ceases to amaze me how people are able to afford cigarettes while complaining of being financially challenged – the joys of being an addict. Again, sometimes life is harsh for the financially challenged. Last edited by GWC...; 03-07-2006 at 05:11 PM. |
|
![]() |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|