Go Back   Winnipesaukee Forum > Winnipesaukee Forums > Boating
Home Forums Gallery Webcams Blogs YouTube Channel Classifieds Register FAQDonate Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-18-2019, 08:48 PM   #1
TiltonBB
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Gilford, NH and Florida
Posts: 3,031
Thanks: 708
Thanked 2,209 Times in 941 Posts
Default

From the NH Boating Guide:

Towing a Person With a Vessel Legally:

Vessel operators towing a person(s) on water skis, tubes, kneeboards, aquaplanes, or any other devices also must obey these laws.

In addition to the operator, an observer must be on board to observe the progress of the person being towed. The observer must be at least 13 years old, able to determine when a skier is in trouble, and able to assist the skier.


I would be very surprised if the Marine Patrol, and the court, do not find that this did not comply with the current laws. There may be some changes needed in the law to consider these "vessels" but the existing laws do not anticipate something like this.
TiltonBB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2019, 10:09 PM   #2
FlyingScot
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Tuftonboro and Sudbury, MA
Posts: 2,428
Thanks: 1,329
Thanked 1,034 Times in 640 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TiltonBB View Post
From the NH Boating Guide:

Towing a Person With a Vessel Legally:

Vessel operators towing a person(s) on water skis, tubes, kneeboards, aquaplanes, or any other devices also must obey these laws.

In addition to the operator, an observer must be on board to observe the progress of the person being towed. The observer must be at least 13 years old, able to determine when a skier is in trouble, and able to assist the skier.


I would be very surprised if the Marine Patrol, and the court, do not find that this did not comply with the current laws. There may be some changes needed in the law to consider these "vessels" but the existing laws do not anticipate something like this.
Thanks for the link Tilton--I would have let this go, but your quote makes it fun. I agree that these vessels were not contemplated, but I disagree with your interpretation on the letter of the law.

SP (the skier) is clearly the operator of the vessel--he is doing so by remote control. Then, in addition to the operator, there must be someone observing the skier.

So my take is that although the law may allow SP to operate and ski simultaneously, it does not allow him to observe while doing either of the other activities.

Ironic that the easier of the two on board tasks is the is one that hangs up the idea. But if you really think about the towing rules, you can see that this whole idea--although very cool in theory--is against the general spirit of having multiple people paying attention.
FlyingScot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2019, 10:41 PM   #3
Garcia
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 619
Thanks: 138
Thanked 284 Times in 172 Posts
Default Is NH one of the 41?

Their website says it is legal in 41 states, Guam, Puerto Rico, and Washington DC. Is NH, Live Free or Die, one of the 41?
Garcia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2019, 11:58 PM   #4
Descant
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Merrimack and Welch Island
Posts: 4,422
Thanks: 1,368
Thanked 1,638 Times in 1,070 Posts
Default Pwc

The key here is that this is a PWC, not a boat pulling a skier. We have no need for an observer on a PWC although everything else is similar to the personal ski machine.
BTW, there are certain slalom courses and boats where an observer is not required. Don't quote the law until you have read the entire RSA in its most recent version. And be sure you are quoting the right section, PWC vs skiers.
Descant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2019, 07:04 AM   #5
thinkxingu
Senior Member
 
thinkxingu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 6,347
Thanks: 1,176
Thanked 2,108 Times in 1,305 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Descant View Post
We have no need for an observer on a PWC...
From my research, I don't think this is accurate. The Boat-Ed rules for PWC say, "Remember…

PWC operators are subject to all boating laws. In addition, “ski craft” operators must follow the laws on these pages." This extra laws are on timing and size of area to be used in.

As for legality, I concur with the posts above that this would be considered illegal without a spotter. I would need to take a hard look at the system to decide if there would be sufficient safety systems in place to justify legal language changes.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
thinkxingu is online now   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 08-19-2019, 07:37 AM   #6
jazzman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Mont Vernon NH & Big Barndoor Island
Posts: 323
Thanks: 4
Thanked 184 Times in 62 Posts
Default

I don't think I'd want to be on a kayak in the vicinity of this thing. It's got to be tough for the operator to see someone at water level while skiing with this 50 feet in front of them.
jazzman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2019, 10:17 AM   #7
kawishiwi
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 519
Thanks: 227
Thanked 167 Times in 108 Posts
Default Both at the same time...

I think the controller of one of these is both the skier & spotter at the same time. They ski & drive.
The reason for a spotter is to tell the boat capt. what the skier is doing so the capt. can focus on driving. A skier needs the capt & spotter so they can signal to the capt, through the spotter. Clearly in this case the "controller/driver" has a quite intimate and immediate understanding of how the skier is doing. Self spotting? Yes. Self driving? Yes. While skiing? Yes.
Strongest arguments against would be kill switch & concerns that a skier can maintain effective "driving" awareness.
__________________
"I don't take responsibility at all."
kawishiwi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2019, 10:27 AM   #8
thinkxingu
Senior Member
 
thinkxingu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 6,347
Thanks: 1,176
Thanked 2,108 Times in 1,305 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kawishiwi View Post
Strongest arguments against would be kill switch & concerns that a skier can maintain effective "driving" awareness.
"Driving" awareness is exactly the reason for a spotter requirement--essentially, the law assumes (correctly?) that a person cannot drive AND spot safely.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
thinkxingu is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2019, 12:54 PM   #9
kawishiwi
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 519
Thanks: 227
Thanked 167 Times in 108 Posts
Default Matter of perspective

Quote:
Originally Posted by thinkxingu View Post
"Driving" awareness is exactly the reason for a spotter requirement--essentially, the law assumes (correctly?) that a person cannot drive AND spot safely.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
Apples to...not apples. A capt is supposed to look ahead to operate safely, not back to the skier, hence the need for a spotter to inform the capt. of the skiers status. Capt cant know how the skier is doing and pay attention to driving. The solo skier/driver never has to look back. They are fully self aware of their own skiing status. There is no capt. to inform of their staus and therefor no need for a spotter at all to inform a capt. Essentially the spotter has one purpose, communication between capt & skier. If the capt is the skiier there is no need for a middleman.
However there is a question as to how well can one person ski WHILE ALSO being capt. of a waterborn drone.
Skiing up right, facing forward, at a slow to moderate speed, I think it can be done safely. While wake jumping, doing spins, tricks...not so much.
__________________
"I don't take responsibility at all."
kawishiwi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2019, 01:34 PM   #10
tis
Senior Member
 
tis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,782
Thanks: 755
Thanked 1,467 Times in 1,023 Posts
Default

Unless he gets hurt, Kawishiwi. Then there is no driver OR spotter to help. So that brings up our age old questions-how many laws do we need to protect ourselves? A lot I guess. SP, if you are skiing early in the morning with no traffic somebody should be watching to make sure you are ok. If you are skiing when there is traffic it might be tricky to maneuver. The up side is somebody would help you if you needed help.
tis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2019, 02:07 PM   #11
Seaplane Pilot
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,177
Thanks: 664
Thanked 943 Times in 368 Posts
Default

As tis mentioned in a prior post, what's the difference between the ski machine and kite boarding? No spotter needed with kite boarding:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X0A1suBPSoY

As far as being injured or something else happening that would be useful to have a spotter or someone watching: What if I'm out on an SUP by myself and I fell and hit my head on the board? No difference really.

And a previous poster mentioned being concerned if they were in a kayak while I'm out there getting towed around. As I've said before on this forum, ALL kayaks should be required to fly a safety flag - period. Otherwise, the options are 1) don't go out; 2) stay close to shore; 3) paddle faster!

I've been in touch with the factory this morning to check on lead time and ordering process so I can take delivery next spring. Can't wait.
Seaplane Pilot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2019, 02:31 PM   #12
ishoot308
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Gilford, NH / Welch Island
Posts: 6,320
Thanks: 2,407
Thanked 5,316 Times in 2,075 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Seaplane Pilot View Post
I've been in touch with the factory this morning to check on lead time and ordering process so I can take delivery next spring. Can't wait.
I thought you were just kidding about this!! Good for you! I can't wait to see one in action!

Dan
__________________
It's Always Sunny On Welch Island!!
ishoot308 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2019, 02:50 PM   #13
Seaplane Pilot
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,177
Thanks: 664
Thanked 943 Times in 368 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ishoot308 View Post
I thought you were just kidding about this!! Good for you! I can't wait to see one in action!

Dan
I'll give you a heads-up and will do some Welch Island fly-bys next year!
Seaplane Pilot is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Seaplane Pilot For This Useful Post:
ishoot308 (08-19-2019)
Old 08-19-2019, 03:30 PM   #14
Descant
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Merrimack and Welch Island
Posts: 4,422
Thanks: 1,368
Thanked 1,638 Times in 1,070 Posts
Default Free beach

Quote:
Originally Posted by Seaplane Pilot View Post
I'll give you a heads-up and will do some Welch Island fly-bys next year!
Plenty of room on my beach, south side.
Descant is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Descant For This Useful Post:
Seaplane Pilot (08-19-2019)
Old 08-19-2019, 03:04 PM   #15
brk-lnt
Senior Member
 
brk-lnt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: South Down Shores
Posts: 1,944
Thanks: 544
Thanked 570 Times in 335 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Seaplane Pilot View Post
I've been in touch with the factory this morning to check on lead time and ordering process so I can take delivery next spring. Can't wait.
I'd rather see a bunch of these things on the lake than more wakeboard boats

I have always wondered why these units have not caught on. I first recall seeing one at a boat show ~30 years ago, but have only ever come across one on the water twice since then.
__________________
[insert witty phrase here]
brk-lnt is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to brk-lnt For This Useful Post:
Seaplane Pilot (08-19-2019)
Old 08-19-2019, 03:28 PM   #16
thinkxingu
Senior Member
 
thinkxingu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 6,347
Thanks: 1,176
Thanked 2,108 Times in 1,305 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by brk-lnt View Post
I'd rather see a bunch of these things on the lake than more wakeboard boats

I have always wondered why these units have not caught on. I first recall seeing one at a boat show ~30 years ago, but have only ever come across one on the water twice since then.
Just for the record, I'm not against these at all, just interpreting the law per the OP's initial request. I agree on the wake boats.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
thinkxingu is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to thinkxingu For This Useful Post:
Seaplane Pilot (08-19-2019)
Old 08-19-2019, 02:17 PM   #17
Descant
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Merrimack and Welch Island
Posts: 4,422
Thanks: 1,368
Thanked 1,638 Times in 1,070 Posts
Default Jet Ski !!

Quote:
Originally Posted by tis View Post
Unless he gets hurt, Kawishiwi. Then there is no driver OR spotter to help. So that brings up our age old questions-how many laws do we need to protect ourselves? A lot I guess. SP, if you are skiing early in the morning with no traffic somebody should be watching to make sure you are ok. If you are skiing when there is traffic it might be tricky to maneuver. The up side is somebody would help you if you needed help.
I can go out on my JET SKI with nobody watching. Both machines have a shut off if I fall. In fact, the one that SP brought forward will circle back to the operator. A traditional PWC will not do that. Both have the same risk if I am injured.
BTW, if you read RSA 270 where it talks about jet skis, it refers to size, etc and then says... and similar devices. I think this is already covered.
There would be restrictions in small coves where a PWC has to go at headway speed to get to open water. Head way speed for a skier can be very tiring, and you have to do it outbound and on return. This is a great option for those on a 300-1000 acre lake, and certain areas of larger lakes.
Descant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2019, 02:48 PM   #18
kawishiwi
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 519
Thanks: 227
Thanked 167 Times in 108 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tis View Post
Unless he gets hurt, Kawishiwi. Then there is no driver OR spotter to help. So that brings up our age old questions-how many laws do we need to protect ourselves? A lot I guess. SP, if you are skiing early in the morning with no traffic somebody should be watching to make sure you are ok. If you are skiing when there is traffic it might be tricky to maneuver. The up side is somebody would help you if you needed help.
Well solo anything has that risk. A PFD is a must.
__________________
"I don't take responsibility at all."
kawishiwi is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

This page was generated in 0.17409 seconds