![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Gallery | Webcams | Blogs | YouTube Channel | Classifieds | Register | FAQ | Members List | Donate | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Kuna ID
Posts: 2,755
Thanks: 244
Thanked 1,942 Times in 802 Posts
|
LOL kinda hard to prove fraud when you can't prove identity or track who and where a person voted now isn't it?
Of course that's the whole point. You're not interested in whether or not those that are eligible to vote do so and ensure one vote per person is cast. |
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Tuftonboro and Sudbury, MA
Posts: 2,552
Thanks: 1,412
Thanked 1,075 Times in 668 Posts
|
Quote:
Also, please do not opine on what I am interested in or not--I have not accused you of wanting to suppress votes, you should not accuse me of being indifferent to stuffing the ballot box. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/03/u...ommission.html |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Kuna ID
Posts: 2,755
Thanks: 244
Thanked 1,942 Times in 802 Posts
|
Quote:
By requiring an ID there is no suppression of voting, get an ID you're good to go, fail to do so and you can't. That is not suppression, it's simply putting a simple requirement to ensure the law is being followed. By taking the position of not requiring an ID would infer the consequences of doing so are acceptable. |
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|