Go Back   Winnipesaukee Forum > Winnipesaukee Forums > Covid-19 Discussions & Information
Home Forums Gallery Webcams Blogs YouTube Channel Classifieds Register FAQ Members List Donate Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-09-2020, 04:56 PM   #1
MAXUM
Senior Member
 
MAXUM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Kuna ID
Posts: 2,755
Thanks: 244
Thanked 1,942 Times in 802 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyingScot View Post
Still waiting for your examples of voter fraud...
LOL kinda hard to prove fraud when you can't prove identity or track who and where a person voted now isn't it?

Of course that's the whole point. You're not interested in whether or not those that are eligible to vote do so and ensure one vote per person is cast.
MAXUM is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to MAXUM For This Useful Post:
joey2665 (04-09-2020), Wifi-1 (04-09-2020)
Old 04-09-2020, 05:11 PM   #2
FlyingScot
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Tuftonboro and Sudbury, MA
Posts: 2,552
Thanks: 1,412
Thanked 1,075 Times in 668 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MAXUM View Post
LOL kinda hard to prove fraud when you can't prove identity or track who and where a person voted now isn't it?

Of course that's the whole point. You're not interested in whether or not those that are eligible to vote do so and ensure one vote per person is cast.
No, it should not be hard if it exists in any sort of significant way. Interestingly, the panel that the President appointed to look into this had the same problem. To the President's credit--once he saw there was really nothing there, he disbanded the panel. (Similar to him catching up when he realized covid was actually dangerous)

Also, please do not opine on what I am interested in or not--I have not accused you of wanting to suppress votes, you should not accuse me of being indifferent to stuffing the ballot box.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/03/u...ommission.html
FlyingScot is offline  
Old 04-09-2020, 06:00 PM   #3
MAXUM
Senior Member
 
MAXUM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Kuna ID
Posts: 2,755
Thanks: 244
Thanked 1,942 Times in 802 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyingScot View Post
No, it should not be hard if it exists in any sort of significant way. Interestingly, the panel that the President appointed to look into this had the same problem. To the President's credit--once he saw there was really nothing there, he disbanded the panel. (Similar to him catching up when he realized covid was actually dangerous)

Also, please do not opine on what I am interested in or not--I have not accused you of wanting to suppress votes, you should not accuse me of being indifferent to stuffing the ballot box.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/03/u...ommission.html
It's impossible to PROVE fraud when the very means to determine it are not available. Similar to proving somebody has COVID 19 without actually testing them to confirm it even though they may show all the symptoms.

By requiring an ID there is no suppression of voting, get an ID you're good to go, fail to do so and you can't. That is not suppression, it's simply putting a simple requirement to ensure the law is being followed.

By taking the position of not requiring an ID would infer the consequences of doing so are acceptable.
MAXUM is offline  
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

This page was generated in 0.10917 seconds