Go Back   Winnipesaukee Forum > Winnipesaukee Forums > General Discussion
Home Forums Gallery Webcams Blogs YouTube Channel Classifieds Register FAQDonate Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-21-2021, 03:50 PM   #1
jbolty
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 665
Thanks: 320
Thanked 252 Times in 151 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mishman View Post
Hesitant to wade into these shark infested waters but how many of these commenters have been on a well maintained bicycle trail in a tourism hot spot like our lake?
I admit that I don't know the number of train riders but I would wager many, many times more people (locals and tourists) would use the trail for hiking and cycling than train riders. These bike trails generate lots of tourism dollars as people want healthy forms of recreation. You can see it all around the country.
I have ridden bike trails in FL, on the west coast and principally in New England. Almost without exception, businesses along rail trails love the business these trails generates. Cyclists and walkers stop for refreshments, meals, a beer (or two) and come back again and again. Cycling is easy on the joints and I know many cyclists in their 70s who easily do 20 miles daily (especially along rail trails with their modest grade changes).
I would like to see trail accommodate more people than the limited numbers of train riders - and I have nothing against trains. It is simply a matter of highest and best use of this corridor. Hands down it is for people powered transport.
Well, I guess there is blood in the water now
if people want to get worked up over it that's on them; we're just talking here. The argument in favor of keeping the rails seems to boil down to "it's always been there and thus it shall ever be"
jbolty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2021, 04:23 PM   #2
Cobalt 25
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Cape Cod
Posts: 227
Thanks: 227
Thanked 36 Times in 20 Posts
Default

I live fairly close to the bike trail here on the Cape and my wife tells me we did over 100 miles on the trails in 2020, even though our boats come first. We ate (carefully and socially-distanced) at several of the restaurants and would have done more if not for Covid. As mentioned in previous posts, the Cape bike trails get tons of use.

But we stay at a place in Paugus that has the train going 50 yards from the house and our grandkids love it when it goes by.

I really have no dog in this fight. I like the bike trail AND trains!

Would that we could somehow have both.
Cobalt 25 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Cobalt 25 For This Useful Post:
jbolty (01-21-2021)
Old 01-21-2021, 05:02 PM   #3
Woodsy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Weirs Beach
Posts: 1,966
Thanks: 80
Thanked 980 Times in 440 Posts
Default

The WOW trail co-exists with the RR for its entire (current) length. If they want to extend it to the Weirs, then pay the $$$ during construction to co-exist with the RR.

IMHO, It is not in the State/Public best interest to kill a tax paying existing business that is by all accounts doing well even during Covid. Sets a dangerous precedent.

I won't get into the homeless encampments that exist just off the WOW trail now! Just what the Weirs needs.... homeless encampments! Especially along all that very expensive Paugus Bay property!

This is all moot anyway..... pretty sure the RR has a 10yr option to renew coming up and then there will be the STB to deal with.

Woodsy
__________________
The only way to eliminate ignorant behavior is through education. You can't fix stupid.
Woodsy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Woodsy For This Useful Post:
Biggd (01-21-2021), Descant (01-21-2021)
Old 01-21-2021, 05:35 PM   #4
MAXUM
Senior Member
 
MAXUM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Kuna ID
Posts: 2,755
Thanks: 246
Thanked 1,942 Times in 802 Posts
Default

Rip up the rails and turn that trail into an OHRV trail do it all the way up through Franconia Notch and hook it into the Presidential Rec Trail on the back side of Twin Mtn.

That would be awesome! Especially if there was plenty of dual use roads for OHRV use along the way for gas and food stops.

Perfect!
MAXUM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2021, 06:04 PM   #5
Trail Goer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: New Durham
Posts: 180
Thanks: 124
Thanked 98 Times in 59 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jbolty View Post
The argument in favor of keeping the rails seems to boil down to "it's always been there and thus it shall ever be"
That's not true at all, the state has converted many railroad lines to trails, one was just recently (or is in the process of being), converted to a trail from Littleton to Whitefield. The difference between that line and this line is very clear though. The line in Littleton had no online shippers, the operator leasing the line gave up its common carrier rights (approved by the STB) and with no operators and shippers showing interest, the state petitioned and was approved by the STB to abandon the line. With two operators leasing the line along Winnipesaukee, there's not much the state can do, even if they wanted to close the line.
Trail Goer is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Trail Goer For This Useful Post:
Biggd (01-21-2021)
Sponsored Links
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

This page was generated in 0.22938 seconds