Go Back   Winnipesaukee Forum > Winnipesaukee Forums > Boating
Home Forums Gallery Webcams Blogs YouTube Channel Classifieds Register FAQ Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-14-2021, 07:08 PM   #1
LikeLakes
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 339
Thanks: 50
Thanked 92 Times in 66 Posts
Default

I just love the looks of those. CVX's and some other Carlson designs are still, to me, some of the best looking boats of their time. That has to fly with the 225, plus pretty much leave the water when you hammer it from a stop.
LikeLakes is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to LikeLakes For This Useful Post:
BroadHopper (06-24-2021), Cal Coon (06-14-2021)
Old 06-14-2021, 07:57 PM   #2
XCR-700
Senior Member
 
XCR-700's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: MA
Posts: 1,342
Thanks: 757
Thanked 538 Times in 313 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LikeLakes View Post
I just love the looks of those. CVX's and some other Carlson designs are still, to me, some of the best looking boats of their time. That has to fly with the 225, plus pretty much leave the water when you hammer it from a stop.
I think it would still be a good design today with a few mods, maybe stretch it like 3 - 4 feet, add a foot to the sides but keep the overall look and then add a U-shaped rear seat.

Everyone wants bow-riders these days, and they make sense in many ways, but having someone sitting in front of you while driving is not fun. I really prefer the closed bow/cockpit forward design. I find it interesting that Chris-Craft still keeps this design.

Well next time one of the boat manufacturers ask me for my opinion, I'll try to remember my own ideas

Oh, and I'll see if they can balance it out to use a heavy-ass 4 stroke on the back
XCR-700 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2021, 10:25 PM   #3
LikeLakes
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 339
Thanks: 50
Thanked 92 Times in 66 Posts
Default

As long as you have twin 450 hp outboards ....

What you are describing, without the extra foot of beam, is pretty much a 24 Pantera or similar 24x7 boat. While I like bowriders for certain types of boats I'm in agreement with you about closed bow on performance and classic boats, also the practicality of not worrying as much about taking some water over the bow on a big lake like Winni.

Is your CVX a 20?
LikeLakes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2021, 10:28 PM   #4
LikeLakes
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 339
Thanks: 50
Thanked 92 Times in 66 Posts
Default

One point I meant to add about modern 4-strokes .... and to be honest I don't know if this feature is available on 2-strokes, but I doubt it - a friend of mine with a Merc 150 4-stroke uses the trolling feature that lets him idle down to something like 350 rpm. The modern engine management systems are amazing.
LikeLakes is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to LikeLakes For This Useful Post:
DotRat (06-15-2021)
Old 06-22-2021, 05:26 PM   #5
LIforrelaxin
Senior Member
 
LIforrelaxin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Texas, Lake Ray Hubbard and NH, Long Island Winnipesaukee
Posts: 2,887
Thanks: 1,040
Thanked 894 Times in 526 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LikeLakes View Post
One point I meant to add about modern 4-strokes .... and to be honest I don't know if this feature is available on 2-strokes, but I doubt it - a friend of mine with a Merc 150 4-stroke uses the trolling feature that lets him idle down to something like 350 rpm. The modern engine management systems are amazing.
At this point it is likely that this can be achieve with a two stroke as well. The problem is companies don't want to keep adding new features to a market that is no longer their bread and butter....

4 Strokes are taking over the outboard Market, and that is something us 2 stoke fans have to live with. Companies aren't investing in research and development for 2 Strokes, it doesn't make sense. The Pontoon / Tri-toon market as well as the need for I/O motors to be CARB compliant, and have catalytic converters, has redirected R&D money into bigger stronger quieter outboards..... to drive the boating market forward........
__________________
Life is about how much time you can spend relaxing... I do it on an island that isn't really an island.....
LIforrelaxin is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to LIforrelaxin For This Useful Post:
LikeLakes (06-22-2021)
Sponsored Links
Old 06-22-2021, 06:11 PM   #6
XCR-700
Senior Member
 
XCR-700's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: MA
Posts: 1,342
Thanks: 757
Thanked 538 Times in 313 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LIforrelaxin View Post
At this point it is likely that this can be achieve with a two stroke as well. The problem is companies don't want to keep adding new features to a market that is no longer their bread and butter....

4 Strokes are taking over the outboard Market, and that is something us 2 stoke fans have to live with. Companies aren't investing in research and development for 2 Strokes, it doesn't make sense. The Pontoon / Tri-toon market as well as the need for I/O motors to be CARB compliant, and have catalytic converters, has redirected R&D money into bigger stronger quieter outboards..... to drive the boating market forward........
And in truth those are the real driving factors in the current trend toward 4-stroke outboards. Other reasons stand farther down the line of justifications.
XCR-700 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2021, 07:00 AM   #7
Dave R
Senior Member
 
Dave R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,985
Thanks: 246
Thanked 744 Times in 444 Posts
Default

I have a 2004 two stroke Mercury (pretty sure it's a re-badged Tohatsu) 15HP outboard on my 2020 RIB tender that runs great and planes out with two adults on board. I went with it because I already owned it (it came with my first tender) and it only weighs 72 lbs. A four stroke 15 HP to 20HP weighs over 110 lbs. I'd love to have the power of a 20HP four stroke, but I don't want the weight or complexity.
Dave R is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Dave R For This Useful Post:
BroadHopper (06-24-2021)
Old 06-23-2021, 08:34 AM   #8
AC2717
Senior Member
 
AC2717's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Maynard, MA & Paugus Bay
Posts: 2,585
Thanks: 756
Thanked 356 Times in 268 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave R View Post
I have a 2004 two stroke Mercury (pretty sure it's a re-badged Tohatsu) 15HP outboard on my 2020 RIB tender that runs great and planes out with two adults on board. I went with it because I already owned it (it came with my first tender) and it only weighs 72 lbs. A four stroke 15 HP to 20HP weighs over 110 lbs. I'd love to have the power of a 20HP four stroke, but I don't want the weight or complexity.
the smaller mercs are made by Tohatsu you are correct. and yes that is my issue is the weight of the 4 stroke vs if was a 2 stroke on such a small boat
__________________
Capt. of the "No Worries"
AC2717 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2021, 02:07 AM   #9
BroadHopper
Senior Member
 
BroadHopper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Laconia NH
Posts: 5,599
Thanks: 3,237
Thanked 1,113 Times in 799 Posts
Default Modern 2 strokes vs 4 strokes

https://www.uti.edu/blog/marine/outb...ors-guide-2020

According to this article, it is pretty much a wash. It's all about personal preference and dealer support. Personally, I love the 2 strokes for my toys.
__________________
Someday may never be an actual day.
BroadHopper is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to BroadHopper For This Useful Post:
ApS (06-29-2021)
Old 06-24-2021, 11:48 AM   #10
LikeLakes
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 339
Thanks: 50
Thanked 92 Times in 66 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BroadHopper View Post
https://www.uti.edu/blog/marine/outb...ors-guide-2020

According to this article, it is pretty much a wash. It's all about personal preference and dealer support. Personally, I love the 2 strokes for my toys.
That has to be the most vanilla, no facts, no specifics article I've read in some time. It says each motor type has closed the gap on the other, but doesn't actually recommend anything. I think we already knew both tech's were improving.
LikeLakes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2021, 03:46 AM   #11
mofn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 72
Thanks: 0
Thanked 19 Times in 15 Posts
Default

1) As to XCR-700 and a $200 diagnostic charge, it's worse than that! I Was told Thursday during yearly tuneup from the owner he asked to know the hours on the motor, that was a $100 charge on the bill!
I should not have any of these issues with my Vessel View, issues/faults come right up on the screen. My only complaint is the Mercury instructions SUCK, you needed Youtube to figure out how to max out options.
2) New 2-strokes you can get them...Australia, New Zealand and few other island nations in the region. Before you order and ship one, I mail an item world wide just under 4 lbs. w/ U.S.P.S. it's over $50.
3) Weights being noted...from Google:
My 85 hp Force 255 lbs. max only once (on a.m. glass) in Alton Bay @21 mph.
After the 3rd toon was added dropped to 14ish mph.
My 175 hp 460 lbs. max 26 mph, before it died was 19 mph one cylinder not firing part was on order.
My 150 4-stroke 455 lbs. Doing 29 to 30.5 mph at W.O.T. @4350? RPM off the Vessel View. RPM range off Google says 5000-5800 not sure on mine but well under any number.
Weds Shep's to start of Alton Bay 11-12 mph, ripped it down the bay to the docks. Docks to West Alton Marina (22ish mph) 5.85 gallons. This means less gas/weight now in 2nd tank than years before...additional weight savings. Going to lower that tank to 3 gallons this week as the backup.
As I stated prior, I was dead set against a 4-stroke before last years rental. The instant start up Thursday and getting out of where I was in that wind is a further reason I'm glad for the move.
mofn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2021, 08:42 PM   #12
ApS
Senior Member
 
ApS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Florida (Sebring & Keys), Wolfeboro
Posts: 5,966
Thanks: 2,240
Thanked 783 Times in 559 Posts
Thumbs up Testing A 50-Year Old 2-Horsepower Evinrude...

Quote:
Originally Posted by BroadHopper View Post

According to this article, it is pretty much a wash. It's all about personal preference and dealer support. Personally, I love the 2 strokes for my toys.
A friend asked to borrow my puddle-jumper to test a motor he bought for $12.50. Would this be an engine from the 1970s? (Photo below).

Once we'd turned the gas line switch to "on" it started right up. (An easy pull, although the 2-cylinder is rated easier to start).

After a brief warm-up, we headed into a strong wind. Only after not knowing how much gasoline was in the integral tank, we turned back. All in all, I was impressed.

My 1970s 3-HP was far quieter, with less vibration. When I'd visited neighbors, they would ask "Is it running?" (When it was running). Very light, I'd made a bracket to adapt the engine to my 15-foot aluminum canoe.
Attached Images
 
ApS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2021, 09:20 AM   #13
LikeLakes
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 339
Thanks: 50
Thanked 92 Times in 66 Posts
Default

I used a few of those 2 HP on friend's sailboats. Amazingly light and very reliable, sipped gas. I found them a bit noisy as well, not so much loud as kind of buzzy. My older 3 is smoother and quieter, I assume that's because it has a full cowl.
LikeLakes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2021, 07:48 AM   #14
8gv
Senior Member
 
8gv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,120
Thanks: 64
Thanked 750 Times in 484 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave R View Post
I have a 2004 two stroke Mercury (pretty sure it's a re-badged Tohatsu) 15HP outboard on my 2020 RIB tender that runs great and planes out with two adults on board. I went with it because I already owned it (it came with my first tender) and it only weighs 72 lbs. A four stroke 15 HP to 20HP weighs over 110 lbs. I'd love to have the power of a 20HP four stroke, but I don't want the weight or complexity.
I have that same motor.

It is mounted to a 130# Starcraft SL 14' aluminum boat.

It flies!

When it's just me in the stern the light weight motor is better for getting up on plane and minimizing bow rise when doing so.

It's a keeper!
8gv is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to 8gv For This Useful Post:
ApS (06-29-2021), BroadHopper (06-24-2021)
Old 07-01-2021, 08:41 AM   #15
Dave R
Senior Member
 
Dave R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,985
Thanks: 246
Thanked 744 Times in 444 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 8gv View Post
I have that same motor.

It is mounted to a 130# Starcraft SL 14' aluminum boat.

It flies!

When it's just me in the stern the light weight motor is better for getting up on plane and minimizing bow rise when doing so.

It's a keeper!
Mine is on a 10' 6" aluminum/Hypalon RIB that I bought new from North Atlantic Inflatables in Portland, ME (a great business to deal with). I converted it to electric start, remote shift/throttle/steering, added an alternator, and added CMC power trim and tilt. It started life as a 9.9HP but I swapped to a bigger carburetor to bump the power to 15HP (the only differences between the 2004 Mercury two-stroke 6HP, 8HP, 9.9HP and 15HP models are the carburetor sizes). It was a fun project modifying the engine and rigging the boat last year and we use it all the time. It's been used as far south as Provincetown and as far north as Bar Harbor.
Attached Images
   
Dave R is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2021, 11:46 PM   #16
XCR-700
Senior Member
 
XCR-700's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: MA
Posts: 1,342
Thanks: 757
Thanked 538 Times in 313 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LikeLakes View Post
As long as you have twin 450 hp outboards ....

What you are describing, without the extra foot of beam, is pretty much a 24 Pantera or similar 24x7 boat. While I like bowriders for certain types of boats I'm in agreement with you about closed bow on performance and classic boats, also the practicality of not worrying as much about taking some water over the bow on a big lake like Winni.

Is your CVX a 20?
Yes its a 20'

Sadly its in need of a full rebuild and it will need to sit a couple of more years until retirement before I can get to it.
XCR-700 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

This page was generated in 0.16413 seconds