Go Back   Winnipesaukee Forum > Winnipesaukee Forums > General Discussion
Home Forums Gallery Webcams Blogs YouTube Channel Classifieds Register FAQ Members List Donate Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 08-11-2022, 01:11 PM   #11
ishoot308
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Gilford, NH / Welch Island
Posts: 6,367
Thanks: 2,422
Thanked 5,349 Times in 2,093 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Mercier View Post
Prior offenses would only be used for sentencing
If you would of read my post thoroughly, I said, "not if he took the stand to testify on his own behalf". The prosecuting attorney could of brought up and used his prior offenses against him as a "pattern of behavior" tactic to help determine guilt just like they tried at the Kyle Rittenhouse trial... But like I said previously, I'm not sure and highly doubt he did testify considering the outcome!

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Mercier View Post
The ''public'' doesn't decide the case... the jury does. It found him not guilty.
Pretty sure that the jury had access to blood tests and accident reconstruction data.
From what I have read and maybe misunderstood, the blood tests were thrown out for whatever reason...


No need to reply as I'm done on this...

Dan
__________________
It's Always Sunny On Welch Island!!
ishoot308 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ishoot308 For This Useful Post:
Stevebvt (08-12-2022)
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

This page was generated in 0.23171 seconds