Go Back   Winnipesaukee Forum > Winnipesaukee Forums > General Discussion
Home Forums Gallery Webcams Blogs YouTube Channel Classifieds Register FAQ Members List Donate Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-27-2022, 06:01 AM   #1
tis
Senior Member
 
tis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,815
Thanks: 759
Thanked 1,469 Times in 1,025 Posts
Default

It's complicated because it doesn't actually go to the state but it raises more school money and in the richer towns cuts the amount the state gives them. It is still a mandatory STATE tax.
tis is online now  
Old 08-27-2022, 07:09 AM   #2
John Mercier
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 3,526
Thanks: 3
Thanked 627 Times in 516 Posts
Default

All State taxes are mandatory.
But since there is no ''donation'', it isn't a donor town to Franklin.

And since the Education Trust Fund grant money that does go to the other districts comes from mostly business taxes... that also would not be a significant factor in Moultonborough.

Moultonborough went from a farming community to a bedroom community, and it did so in about on half century.

But what does the next half century look like? That is the question that town voters will need to answer.
They may not get it right, but it almost certainly will not be what it is today.

Franklin was a huge mill town (city)... and it was doubtful that the voters at that time realized that the mills would not be there in the future. So it has suffered while it looks to rebuild on a different path.

What will Moultonborough be a half century from now? Right now, they are riding the Boomer Wave.
John Mercier is offline  
Old 08-27-2022, 08:11 AM   #3
tis
Senior Member
 
tis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,815
Thanks: 759
Thanked 1,469 Times in 1,025 Posts
Default

Here’s what you need to know:

SWEPT is part of a home or business property tax bill, which means it is remitted to the home or business owner’s town or city. The town or city does not give SWEPT money to the state, despite being called a “state tax.”
Since it is a “state tax,” it appears on the state budget as a part of the education trust fund. In practice and for accounting purposes, SWEPT money is counted as state funds. In reality, these funds are all locally raised dollars.
State law has required NH property owners to raise $363 million per year in SWEPT funds since 2005.
Whatever a town raises in SWEPT, is deducted from what the state would pay the town in adequate education grants and stabilization grants for their schools.
Most communities have additional local education taxes, since SWEPT funding and state funding (including adequate education grants and stabilization grants) do not cover the total cost for their local schools.
There is a legislative proposal this year to eliminate SWEPT all together.
tis is online now  
Old 08-27-2022, 08:45 AM   #4
John Mercier
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 3,526
Thanks: 3
Thanked 627 Times in 516 Posts
Default

I don't see a LSR for that...
Where did you find it?

Removal of SWEPT would require the State to raise an addition $363 million dollars through another format.

Which format are they proposing to do that through?
John Mercier is offline  
Old 08-27-2022, 09:01 AM   #5
tis
Senior Member
 
tis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,815
Thanks: 759
Thanked 1,469 Times in 1,025 Posts
Default

https://reachinghighernh.org/2019/02...-locally-kept/
tis is online now  
The Following User Says Thank You to tis For This Useful Post:
Seaplane Pilot (08-27-2022)
Sponsored Links
Old 08-27-2022, 09:15 AM   #6
John Mercier
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 3,526
Thanks: 3
Thanked 627 Times in 516 Posts
Default

That was a 2019 legislative proposal...

It was voted down as the money would need to come from another tax source.
It is unlikely to be brought up, as we are attempting to lower taxation in other areas.
John Mercier is offline  
Old 08-27-2022, 12:40 PM   #7
tis
Senior Member
 
tis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,815
Thanks: 759
Thanked 1,469 Times in 1,025 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Mercier View Post
That was a 2019 legislative proposal...

It was voted down as the money would need to come from another tax source.
It is unlikely to be brought up, as we are attempting to lower taxation in other areas.
You just asked me where i got the info about where the money goes and so I sent you the link.

If you look at your tax bill you will see you are charged for:

Town Tax
County Tax
Local School Tax
State School Tax

That is all I am saying. I do not like to argue.
tis is online now  
Old 08-27-2022, 10:31 PM   #8
John Mercier
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 3,526
Thanks: 3
Thanked 627 Times in 516 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tis View Post
You just asked me where i got the info about where the money goes and so I sent you the link.

If you look at your tax bill you will see you are charged for:

Town Tax
County Tax
Local School Tax
State School Tax

That is all I am saying. I do not like to argue.
No. I understand how the funding works.
I was asking about the legislative proposal ''this year'' to remove SWEPT altogether.
I could not find the LSR, so I asked for the link.
John Mercier is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

This page was generated in 1.09261 seconds