![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Gallery | Webcams | Blogs | YouTube Channel | Classifieds | Register | FAQ | Members List | Donate | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Moultonborough
Posts: 552
Thanks: 49
Thanked 101 Times in 76 Posts
|
NH Lakes over 10 acres belong to the state.
https://www.des.nh.gov/sites/g/files...6-20230125.pdf https://legiscan.com/NH/text/HB276/2023 https://kanasatka.org/cyanobacteria/ |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Moultonboro, NH
Posts: 1,683
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 356
Thanked 641 Times in 292 Posts
|
Good discussion here. The green water is getting people's attention much more than predictions about what could happen. My opinion is that education is the most effective preventative. Governments can develop best practices, fund educational programs and mandate things like septic inspections when transferring ownership, but can't get down to the level where it matters. That responsibility belongs to each property owner, on the shoreline and within the watershed.
The green of Kanasatka is massive. Here is a screen show showing part of the problem and a link to a panorama where you can scroll around to see the rest. https://maps.app.goo.gl/72HufD2upCSdAi2BA
__________________
-lg Last edited by Lakegeezer; 09-27-2025 at 04:39 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Jackson Pond, New Hampton
Posts: 247
Thanks: 48
Thanked 142 Times in 79 Posts
|
Does anyone know if a bloom has also occurred in Wakondah Pond? If no then the culprit is most likely to tied directly into Kanatsaka and being a relatively small body of water it should be fairly easy to locate the source of the pollution.
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to NH.Solar For This Useful Post: | ||
ApS (11-02-2023) | ||
|
|
#4 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 5
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
A few towns in NH have enacted health ordinances to require regular maintenance and inspections (if system is so old it is not a state approved design) for their waterfront districts.
While I’m not often in favor of more regulations at the local level in this case it’s helping a town to protect its tax base and helping lakefront owners to protect the value of their property. Thinking out loud I might not even be against a state mandate to require lakefront properties to maintain their systems. The state has done such things, such as “forcing” ADU (accessory dwelling unit) zoning on all NH towns. https://www.deering.nh.us/sites/g/fi..._ordinance.pdf https://www.chesterfield.nh.gov/buil...tem-regulation |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|