Go Back   Winnipesaukee Forum > Winnipesaukee Forums > General Discussion
Home Forums Gallery Webcams Blogs YouTube Channel Classifieds Register FAQ Members List Donate Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-21-2023, 06:27 AM   #1
tis
Senior Member
 
tis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 7,041
Thanks: 803
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,056 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Mercier View Post
Then you would be incorrect. No property tax is sent to the State for to be redistributed; that has been the case since 2011.
Then can you explain why the school portion of our tax bill is broken into two parts-state tax and local tax? I don't have a tax bill in front of me but I am pretty sure that is the cases.
tis is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2023, 08:13 AM   #2
BroadHopper
Senior Member
 
BroadHopper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Laconia NH
Posts: 5,716
Thanks: 3,337
Thanked 1,145 Times in 823 Posts
Default Yet another Education hike!

https://newhampshirebulletin.com/202...utionally-low/
__________________
Someday may never be an actual day.
BroadHopper is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to BroadHopper For This Useful Post:
Loub52 (11-21-2023)
Old 11-21-2023, 09:44 AM   #3
Sue Doe-Nym
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,460
Thanks: 760
Thanked 796 Times in 419 Posts
Default Compelling LTE in LDS

There is a most interesting and compelling letter in today’s Laconia Daily Sun, written by one of our posters. The proposals being presented for renovations to Moultonborough’ schools are stunning, and will run in the $44 to $45 MILLION
taxpayer dollar range! Very few voters bother to show up for the March meeting when votes are cast regarding the school budget. The poster’s point is well taken: don’t complain about your taxes; SHOW UP and vote! Otherwise, the bloated school budget will be rubber stamped, as usual, and the insane spending will continue.
Sue Doe-Nym is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2023, 01:12 PM   #4
John Mercier
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 4,157
Thanks: 3
Thanked 701 Times in 580 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tis View Post
Then can you explain why the school portion of our tax bill is broken into two parts-state tax and local tax? I don't have a tax bill in front of me but I am pretty sure that is the cases.
That is the case... as explained above.

Each school district based on the number of pupils and specified modifiers in the law is to receive a State grant equal to that number. In a school where the State Ed rate raises enough, or more than enough, money... the school is sent no grant.
In a school where the State Ed rate does not raise enough money, the State sends a grant from other sources.

The State Ed grants are used to offset the Local School portion of the tax. In a school where the State Ed rate raises more than necessary... the money is retained and further offsets the Local School portion.

There is two ongoing lawsuits over the current method as the change in 2011 was found to be unconstitutional; and the current adequacy levels are being challenged as to whether they cover the mandates.

The State of NH lost the first round in both. The NHSC heard the case, but deferred it back to the lower court.

https://fairfundingnh.org/lawsuit-conval/
John Mercier is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

This page was generated in 0.13649 seconds