![]() |
![]() |
|
Home | Forums | Gallery | Webcams | Blogs | YouTube Channel | Classifieds | Register | FAQ | Members List | Donate | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Welch Island and The Taylor Community
Posts: 3,333
Thanks: 1,242
Thanked 2,118 Times in 968 Posts
|
![]()
The ZBA voted to allow reconsideration, rescinding their last decision. A subsequent fully noticed public hearing will be scheduled.
Alan |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to Slickcraft For This Useful Post: | ||
Descant (06-20-2024) |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Merrimack and Welch Island
Posts: 4,463
Thanks: 1,379
Thanked 1,665 Times in 1,084 Posts
|
![]()
It will be interesting to see what the applicant will come up with as "new" reasons to sell their proposal. I just don't see how they can overcome the "hardship" requirement, demonstrating that the site is unsuitable for anything else.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Gilford, NH and Florida
Posts: 3,045
Thanks: 724
Thanked 2,225 Times in 948 Posts
|
![]()
Alton Zoning Board reversed the decision.
From the Laconia Sun: https://www.laconiadailysun.com/news...f3284f1f1.html |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 581
Thanks: 125
Thanked 247 Times in 133 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to Little Bear For This Useful Post: | ||
Slickcraft (06-22-2024) |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Lakes Region
Posts: 731
Thanks: 28
Thanked 124 Times in 80 Posts
|
![]()
"the project continued to attract hostility from townspeople"...?
Interesting how citizen opposition to a commercial development in a rural area, which is not permitted by zoning ordinance to the extent it requires a special exemption (and is also completely inconsistent with the town's Master Plan)- is categorized as HOSTILE!! |
![]() |
![]() |
Sponsored Links |
|
![]() |
#6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 2,113
Thanks: 214
Thanked 676 Times in 449 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Sent from my iPhone using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app |
|
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to WinnisquamZ For This Useful Post: | ||
FlyingScot (06-22-2024) |
![]() |
#7 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Welch Island and The Taylor Community
Posts: 3,333
Thanks: 1,242
Thanked 2,118 Times in 968 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Alan |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: the left coast (Portland)and West Alton
Posts: 1,424
Thanks: 66
Thanked 260 Times in 178 Posts
|
![]()
Ah, but does the decision to withdraw the denial (likely based on a fear of getting sued by the applicant) then automatically negate the withdrawal by applicant which was in response to the now moot decision to deny?
In other words: "Back to square one?"
__________________
basking in the benign indifference of the universe |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 581
Thanks: 125
Thanked 247 Times in 133 Posts
|
![]()
I was told that they withdrew all applications, which I assumed included the application for Special Exception with the ZBA. This thing is so fluid it’s difficult to determine what is actually happening.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|