![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Gallery | Webcams | Blogs | YouTube Channel | Classifieds | Register | FAQ | Members List | Donate | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 32
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
There can be no dumber way to raise taxes then what they have cooked up in CA. They are one of the most highly taxed citizens of our nation. and please never mention this state and our lakes to any one who likes to live in the Golden State, please!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: California in Winter, Bear Island in Summer
Posts: 25
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I agree, the CA way is not the way to go we are heavely taxed. I am only suggesting that CA long ago faced the issue of escalating RE taxes and fixed income home owners. The issue forced the City goverments to be more accountable for the dollars they collected. By reducing the ability to raise RE taxes any time someone on the board of supervisors (in NH case- selectmen) decieded that some project was needed, the expenditure had to be justified. In additions, other methods of raising fund were implemented, such as higher development fees for developers, sewer and water hookup fees, etc.. Therefore, only those applying for the additions paid the fees. In addition, any improvements needed by the local jurisdictions which were outside of their budget needed to be approved by the voters, such as bond measures for education, sewer treatment facilites, and so forth. I as a voter actually have a say in how my local money is spent by allowing the city gov. to "add" a special assessment to my tax rate.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|