![]() |
![]() |
|
Home | Forums | Gallery | Webcams | Blogs | YouTube Channel | Classifieds | Register | FAQ | Donate | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 321
Thanks: 0
Thanked 9 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]()
I think a failed septic system does more harm. Do you know of any? Just because a system is old or does not meet current codes does not mean it is putting coliform bacteria into the lake.
I know of one Bear Island property that had to pay about 50k for a new system because the Meredith Health Dept. caught wind of a problem (pun intended). If you know of anybody that has a failed system, send me a PM and I will turn them in in a heartbeat. NH does have septic system laws but they should have a tougher law like Title V in Massachusetts. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Gilmanton, NH
Posts: 754
Thanks: 136
Thanked 93 Times in 51 Posts
|
![]()
About the only thing I'm aware of is the Site Assessment law. Essentially, any waterfront home, prior to being sold, needs an assessment of current system by a licensed designer.
http://www.des.state.nh.us/factsheets/ssb/ssb-10.htm Other than that .... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 321
Thanks: 0
Thanked 9 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]()
Other than That.... Place a call to the local health dept. and say something like "the home at xxx has effluent running from its septic system into the lake".
Within a short time the owners of xxx will be spending lots of money. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Florida (Sebring & Keys), Wolfeboro
Posts: 5,942
Thanks: 2,215
Thanked 778 Times in 554 Posts
|
![]()
I can't speak to island properties, except that some still have outhouses! (Though they may actually be better than "septics", depending...)
Non-existant runoff control uphill washed my neighbor's entire 1940s-era system into the lake in a July 2000 thunderstorm. Good riddance, as the tank's location was revealed by the storm's runoff and discovered to be only 20' from the lake. ![]() My other neighbor sold out to a spec-builder (in the "used-house" business—no offense to Realtors®) who installed a new house adjacent—but right in the middle of the old septic system! Town-approved, both share a new drilled well, and both pump effluent into the existing house's new field. That new field has a continuous, but mostly odorless, trickle around its periphery. Once occupied for the season—and depending on the wind direction—suspicious odors waft my way: the Health Department is happy—what's left for me to do? ![]() Uphill—where the lack of runoff-control begins, a developer has put in a septic system to service 20 yet-to-be-built homes. It abuts an immense rock ledge, which is unlikely to provide good leaching capacity. The system's several "lollipops" can be easily seen from Winter Harbor, which has a single small outlet to The Broads for dilution. Algae clumps are a problem in Winter Harbor, where only a minority of lakefront homes have grassy lawns. IMHO, "slap-dash septics" may be the reason that NH wishes to extend its oversight beyond ~200' from the lake, and not leave it up to the respective Town inspectors and Health Departments. BTW: A distant lake I frequent requests a pumpout "every three years". I'd like to see a pumpout requirement upon the sale of every lakefront home—in addition to "an inspection". There's an adequate turnover of lakefront homes to justify this requirement.
__________________
Is it ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|