Go Back   Winnipesaukee Forum > Winnipesaukee Forums > Home, Cottage or Land Maintenance
Home Forums Gallery Webcams Blogs YouTube Channel Classifieds Register FAQ Members List Donate Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-06-2009, 05:51 PM   #1
BlackeyCoveR
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 3
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Tankless Water Heater Vs Electric

I did the same comparison and ended up staying with the electric water heater. I looked at overall energy consumption, and volume of water we need (family of 5 plus frequent guests).

Although we're at the lake most of the summer, off season not so much. So with electric, I hit the breaker every time we leave and draw no electricity. I was not able to shut off if I went with gas.
BlackeyCoveR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2009, 08:18 AM   #2
hazmatmedic
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 47
Thanks: 6
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Default Jmen24 with good info

I can help with the line sizing and regulator. Most regulators provided by your lp supplier will handle the increase in the btu load of the Rinnai, but if it didn't, they would provide a higher volume regulator for your needs.

The line size is a different story and thats why having your propane supplier provide the Rinnai and installation of that product is probably the most cost effective, because they can do the whole job. Still get a quote from your supplier. The line size calculation isn't as complicated as Jmen24 leads you to believe. The NFPA code books provide that info or most technicians have a handy pocket sized book with the info. The Rinnai recommends the minimum of 3/4" IPS (iron pipe size) for propane supply, but that may have to be increased if it is a long distance from the point the gas supply enters your home.

The other questions regarding line size was standard gas H2O heaters and gas ranges. "Typical" gas ranges are @ 60,000 btus and "typical" H2O heaters are @ 40,000 btus. The standard Rinnais are @ 200.000 btus and this is why it requires a larger line.

The on-demand water heaters are not really for larger homes (more than 2 bathrooms), but are really ideal for smaller second homes. That is based upon some of the information that was provided by Jmen24.

hazmatmedic is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to hazmatmedic For This Useful Post:
jellybean (07-16-2009), Mee-n-Mac (05-07-2009)
Old 05-07-2009, 08:53 AM   #3
jmen24
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,139
Thanks: 223
Thanked 319 Times in 181 Posts
Default Thanks to Hazmatmedic

Thanks for the line sizing info. I do not feel qualified to list line sizing and regualator sizes as I am not an installer, I leave those requirements to the specialized pros.

I want to make sure that I am clear in not selling one unit over the other, the tankless systems are very good, just make sure it fits your lifestyle and needs.
jmen24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2009, 09:29 AM   #4
John E
Senior Member
 
John E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 59
Thanks: 2
Thanked 8 Times in 5 Posts
Default

I can't see any reason not to use the Rinnai aside from initial cost. I'm wiring a large condo project and they are using the Rinnai as their choice of water heater. 2 Bed/ 2 bath units.
John E is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2009, 09:37 AM   #5
wifi
Senior Member
 
wifi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Lakes Region
Posts: 1,321
Thanks: 282
Thanked 287 Times in 169 Posts
Default

200K BTUs... Yikes. Wonder if you could put a heat exchanger on it to recover some of the heat for the house/basement or what ever?
wifi is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 05-07-2009, 09:50 AM   #6
ishoot308
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Gilford, NH / Welch Island
Posts: 6,338
Thanks: 2,412
Thanked 5,334 Times in 2,084 Posts
Default I'll let you know...

I'm having a Rinnai installed in my camp in a week or two and will report back as to it's effectiveness. I have a couple of friends who have snowmobile camps in Pittsburgh New Hampshire that use Rinnais and absolutely love them. I have rarely, if ever, heard anyone who has a Rinnai say anything but positive comments. Hopefully I will be the same!

Dan
ishoot308 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2009, 11:01 AM   #7
jmen24
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,139
Thanks: 223
Thanked 319 Times in 181 Posts
Default

Rinnai is one of the easiest companies to work with regarding any issues, if you have them. They are a good choose if you are thinking of installing any type of system that they produce, tankless, monitor, etc.
jmen24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2009, 01:04 PM   #8
upnorth
Senior Member
 
upnorth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 64
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default Copied from my post a few months back...

We also installed a propane-fired tankless heater and I love it. Water is very hot and we've never run out -- even with multiple simultaneous showers.

The builder recommended we go tankless and the cost differential over a propane fired hot water heater was only $170. Interestingly, when we tried to estimate what level we ought to be for propane pricing (per the deal with Our Town and Eastern propane) -- this being our first year with a new house -- the customer service rep commented that the Rinnai Tankless is very efficient and hardly enters their calculus. On the downside, every single time the hot water is turned on at the faucet for even a moment, the tankless fires up and you can hear it in certain areas of the home -- I'm sure I'm the only one that notices...

I do notice a delay, but it's really not that long, maybe 30 sec?
upnorth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2009, 01:24 PM   #9
Island-Ho
Senior Member
 
Island-Ho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 178
Thanks: 21
Thanked 14 Times in 11 Posts
Default Comment & Question

I would hope that the unit is designed so that a very high percentage of that 200K BTU goes into heating the water and that there is very little wasted to recover for space heating, although you might get a little out of the vent flue.
I am considering using a tankless heater downstream from a solar hot water system. Does anyone know if the Rinnia fires up based on incoming water temperature or simply turns on when the water starts flowing? Obviously the second scenario would be undesirable if the incoming water is already hot enough! Currently my solar heated water flows into a backup gas fired water heater, but I would like to eliminate having to keep that tank warm all the time when there is plenty of solar heated water available.
Island-Ho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2009, 01:57 PM   #10
wifi
Senior Member
 
wifi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Lakes Region
Posts: 1,321
Thanks: 282
Thanked 287 Times in 169 Posts
Default This ought to be easy to figure out

BTU = heat required to raise one lb of water 1 degree F
Water weights about 8 lbs/gallon.

Lets guestimate we start at 50 degrees and want to get to 120 degrees. This is a 120-50=70 degree rise times 8 lbs/gallon = 560 BTUs to raise one gallon of water from 50 to 120.

So, 3 gals/min = 1680 BTUs/minute times 60 minutes = 100,800 BTUs per hour. Efficiency is ~50%?

Hmm... where am I wrong ?
wifi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2009, 03:54 PM   #11
jmen24
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,139
Thanks: 223
Thanked 319 Times in 181 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wifi View Post
BTU = heat required to raise one lb of water 1 degree F
Water weights about 8 lbs/gallon.

Lets guestimate we start at 50 degrees and want to get to 120 degrees. This is a 120-50=70 degree rise times 8 lbs/gallon = 560 BTUs to raise one gallon of water from 50 to 120.

So, 3 gals/min = 1680 BTUs/minute times 60 minutes = 100,800 BTUs per hour. Efficiency is ~50%?

Hmm... where am I wrong ?
Its 8.34BTUs for 1 gallon of water, but that is only skewing a little.

The 200K number I believe is arbitrary. Linked is one of the smaller units Rinnai makes and we use this for discussion http://www.rinnai.us/documentation/d.../V53e_SP-1.pdf It has a rating of .82 so, 82% efficient with a max output of 120K BTU with max flow of 5.3GPM. If you look at the graph, for 3GPM requires 98400K BTU (actual output being transfered into the water) to achieve approx. 60 degree rise in temp with 21600K BTU being lost. Obviously, this unit would not be sized properly, but it works for the point.

The 200K BTU model would not be using the full max output to achieve that rise in temp it would only be using 121K BTUs with a loss of 21K BTUs.

These units use a ambiant temperature sensor to determine output BTUs needed based on call demand.
jmen24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2009, 06:17 PM   #12
wifi
Senior Member
 
wifi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Lakes Region
Posts: 1,321
Thanks: 282
Thanked 287 Times in 169 Posts
Default

Jmen24

Thanks for the clarification
wifi is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

This page was generated in 0.45191 seconds