![]() |
![]() |
|
Home | Forums | Gallery | Webcams | Blogs | YouTube Channel | Classifieds | Register | FAQ | Donate | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 21
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
This is a disturbing post! It would be completely dangerous and insensible to carry a taser on the water! And as another poster stated, the ENTIRE agency is armed this year. They are no different from any other law enforcement agency, and I think it's great that they are finally armed. And no, if you see a Marine Patrol Officer with a firearm, which you will, there is no need to "report it." They have qualified with the weapon, thus earning the right to carry it.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |||||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Florida (Sebring & Keys), Wolfeboro
Posts: 5,943
Thanks: 2,219
Thanked 779 Times in 555 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
For half a century, the Winnipesaukee MPs have not been armed. It's either: 1) justified due to some boating-public demographic we haven't heard about, or 2) it's some kind of embellishment to draw seasonal help—who can then seek LEO employment elsewhere off-season. (A poor way, IMHO, to spend "OPM"—Other People's Money) Quote:
Just don't be the only boat in view on the lake! ![]() It is? ![]() Late last season, I watched a 30-foot boat do a half-dozen large "figure-eights" at top speed. Was it BUI or a chance to run out last year's gasoline? Wouldn't it then make sense to crowd that boat into a 150-foot violation? Quote:
...and... Quote:
...and... Quote:
BTW 1: Just an MP's presence in a narrow spot will reduce 150-foot violations by those knowledgeable in this lake's rules. ![]() BTW 2: Am I seeing the same handful of boaters doing the complaining?
__________________
Is it ![]() ![]() Last edited by ApS; 07-08-2009 at 03:41 AM. Reason: remove some [B], add one BTW... |
|||||
![]() |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|