Go Back   Winnipesaukee Forum > Winnipesaukee Forums > General Discussion
Home Forums Gallery Webcams Blogs YouTube Channel Classifieds Register FAQ Members List Donate Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-17-2026, 07:04 AM   #1
hemlock
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 67
Thanks: 1
Thanked 43 Times in 20 Posts
Default Hb1655fn - Dam Funding

New bill out of committee with an ought to pass recommendation.
100$ annual fee for waterfront property 50$ annual fee for water access property on lakes impounded by state owned dams. To be collected by towns and remitted to the dam fund.

https://gc.nh.gov//bill_Status/billi...2190&inflect=2
hemlock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2026, 08:11 AM   #2
tummyman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Moultonborough
Posts: 889
Thanks: 278
Thanked 764 Times in 271 Posts
Default

Just more state revenue grab. Not sure it is well written, as section 1 VI calls for interest at 8% per year on taxes...does not mention the feee. But this bill calls the $100 a fee. Wonder if that interest payment would stand up in court against a fee when it is not stated it is against the fee, but as a tax. Wonder if they will issue a sticker and charge an extra fee for that? Wonder how this will all work as people deduct taxes for federal income tax purposes.....most usually use their checks $'s paid to get the amounts. Will this now be tax fraud if you don't go back and parse out the "fee"...or is it a "tax".
tummyman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2026, 08:57 AM   #3
TiltonBB
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Gilford, NH and Florida
Posts: 3,160
Thanks: 749
Thanked 2,277 Times in 986 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hemlock View Post
New bill out of committee with an ought to pass recommendation.
100$ annual fee for waterfront property 50$ annual fee for water access property on lakes impounded by state owned dams. To be collected by towns and remitted to the dam fund.

https://gc.nh.gov//bill_Status/billi...2190&inflect=2
I wonder if that includes boat slips owned as waterfront property?
TiltonBB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2026, 09:59 AM   #4
TomC
Senior Member
 
TomC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Lakes Region
Posts: 816
Thanks: 42
Thanked 185 Times in 116 Posts
Default

so many people also use the lake from day boaters to fisherman to tourists on the Mount... and yet they tag the waterfront owners with yet another fee...
TomC is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to TomC For This Useful Post:
tis (02-17-2026), Worm (02-18-2026)
Old 02-17-2026, 10:10 AM   #5
John Mercier
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 3,987
Thanks: 3
Thanked 680 Times in 562 Posts
Default

Boating fees and mooring fees for the dam fund are under other bills.

They either need to raise the $8 million or breach the dams by lowering them to the lowest level possible before removal.

This is that "want"/"need" issue. So removing it from general taxation is going to be an ongoing discussion.
John Mercier is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

This page was generated in 0.18873 seconds