Marine Patrol Releases Stats

[ITD]

This is very disturbing, accidents and deaths are up? This is not what we were told would happen.

[Rinkerfam]

Boat registrations were roughly the same for 2009 as 2008, so those two years are sort of apples to apples. Weather was fairly similar as well. The economy wasn't too different either. So the $64,000 is...was 2009 any safer (it was perceived to be by some) on the Big Lake? Let the debate begin!

[DEJ]

So it appears that those who felt the lake was safer this year were wrong, in reality it was actually less safe, imagine that. I love data.

[Happy Gourmand]

I believe that these stats are for all of NH lakes and rivers....not just Winnipesaukee. I wonder if there is a breakdown of stats available?

[sunset on the dock]

Originally Posted by Pineedles

Yes that's good! But do you think that the act of BWI was really down this year? Or perhaps the Marine Patrol were distracted trying to observe or enforce another law, and that is why there were less arrests for BWI? Gee, I would hate to have BWI enforcement suffer because the MPs are watching for something else.

With the relatively small number of warnings issued(26), that seems a little hard to believe. And BUI violations tend to occur in tandem with the breaking of other boating laws as well, just like on the highways. I wouldn't want our highway laws eliminated so that officers could concentrate on DUI arrests...these other laws are in fact what gives the officers an opportunity to pull drunks over.

Originally Posted by ITD

This is very disturbing, accidents and deaths are up? This is not what we were told would happen.

See below

Originally Posted by DEJ

So it appears that those who felt the lake was safer this year were wrong, in reality it was actually less safe, imagine that. I love data.

So do I, and when you look at the data from the previous 8 years (not just the one previous year) you can see that this year's data compared with data from a few years ago does in fact look rather encouraging. Clearly boater education and sub racetrack speeds will be a combination for a better and safer lake experience for all.

[DEJ]

Based on the 2009 results the data clearly shows a particular law did nothing to make the lake safer. It appears the lake was safer prior to 2009.

[sunset on the dock]

Originally Posted by DEJ

Based on the 2009 results the data clearly shows a particular law did nothing to make the lake safer. It appears the lake was safer prior to 2009.

2006 looks particularly bad compared to last year. Slower speeds and better boater education is a recipe that will be hard to beat!

[BroadHopper]

The marine patrol budget is down this year. That means less resources available for enforcement of the waterways. So it does not surprise me that accidents will be up and BUI infractions will be down.
The number of NWZ infractions tells me that there are an awfully lot of 'boneheads' out there. And it will get worst.

The only way we can make our waters safer is to make sure the marine patrol has enough funds to do their jobs. Not creating more headaches.

[Turtle Boy]

Though it begs the question...with BUI's way down...did all the people who threatened to leave Winni and NH because of a new law do so ?

[BroadHopper]

Originally Posted by Turtle Boy

Though it begs the question...with BUI's way down...did all the people who threatened to leave Winni and NH because of a new law do so ?

With boat registration roughly the same as last year, who replace those that left?

[DEJ]

No one left, could be BUI's are down due to stretched MP resources.

[sunset on the dock]

Originally Posted by DEJ

No one left, could be BUI's are down due to stretched MP resources.

As was alluded to above, many on this forum threatened to boat elsewhere if a certain law was passed. Could those who left have a higher prevalence and tendency for BUI? And again, with 26 speed related warnings it hardly seems reasonable that said MP resources were stretched to any significant extent enforcing the new law. In the future, going after speeders only enhances our ability to pick up the drunks...as we have heard ad nauseum on this forum..."drunks don't obey the law".

[MAXUM]

These stats I don't think reflect the relatively light boat traffic on the lake this year, I'd venture to say it was even lighter this year than last. The weather really messed things up, even for me I was off a good 40-50 hours of operation due to the weather.

[BroadHopper]

Originally Posted by MAXUM

These stats I don't think reflect the relatively light boat traffic on the lake this year, I'd venture to say it was even lighter this year than last. The weather really messed things up, even for me I was off a good 40-50 hours of operation due to the weather.

I have cut my use in half this year. Mostly raft or visit the 'ports'. I notice less waiting at all ports this year. I notice skippers are 'hanging out' more at their marinas. I also notice a number of boats that had their shrink wraps on all summer. So the signs of less boat traffic are out there. Not hard to find.

[DEJ]

As I said no one left. I see the same boats this year as I have seen for the past several seasons and some new one's to boot. Saying they were leaving was a bunch of stuff as I think most here know.

With only 26 warnings considering the number of boats that use the lake this clearly shows that this is not a problem and backs up the study the MP did which also showed this wan not an issue. Data, gotta love it!!!.

[VtSteve]

Whenever more specific data comes out, perhaps this will be clearer.

Personally, I'd love to discuss just the data itself, with no agenda one way or the other. I "Think" we can have an intelligent discussion without the singling out of one issue or another.

[Resident 2B]

My opinion is the data does not show much, one way or the other. I believe we need another year to see two years of data before any real conclusion can be drawn.

R2B