![]() |
![]() |
|
Home | Forums | Gallery | Webcams | Blogs | YouTube Channel | Classifieds | Register | FAQ | Members List | Donate | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#10 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Alton
Posts: 1,908
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 533
Thanked 579 Times in 260 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Uh, nope. That's now. Here and now. Period. Try to challenge a contact that's been passed by the voters (or NOT passed) and see how far you get. You cannot just change a contract that's been passed by the voters because an unforeseen expense came up. You CAN re-negoiate the contract for the next round OR amend a contract and hold a special hearing with a vote (ballot) taken afterwards - but that costs money, too. It can be changed by a special hearing and vote - again - as decided by either a majority vote or two-thirds vote - depending on the type of warrant article that is presented. (A teachers' contract would be a majorty vote, I believe.) Of course the courts don't set the tax rates - how silly is that - but they do have to uphold the intent of the voters, as they interpret the warrant articles presented at the time of voting. That's the process, my friend. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|