New NH Taxpayer !

[robmac]

Still more cost effective than MA. I'll never go back been here over half of my life.

[LIforrelaxin]

Originally Posted by robmac

Still more cost effective than MA. I'll never go back been here over half of my life.

Ummmm don't be so certain of that.... I have done cost comparison.... And you really aren't as better off then you think......

The money is just taken from you in different ways......

[fatlazyless]

For 25-years, I ran a profitable little owner-operator business down in Boston and had up to three employees, and yes I confess to having been a Massachusetts Republican back in the 1970's, 80's & 90's.


Now as someone who always takes the time to vote, I've definately done a real life Mr Hyde & Dr Jeckle transformation by rethinking myself into a New Hampshire Democrat.........hardcore unemployed!

How do you say N H 5% Income Tax!

[chipj29]

Originally Posted by fatlazyless

How do you say N H 5% Income Tax!

I would pronounce it: "Go back to Massachusetts"

[tis]

I agree Chip. Let's pick and choose who we allow to come here! If they like the income tax, they can't come. If they want to come here because they like the way it is (or was before they came) but then want to change it, then they also can't come. If they want more government, then they can't come. If they want a nanny state, then they can't come. If they want more and more services for which we all have to pay, then they can't come. If they want to take over our local government, (run the planning boards, selectmen, etc.) then they can't come. NH has changed enough. We don't want any more.
I am reminded of a friend who went to a newcomer's meeting. The person who was speaking said: "Now that we are here we want to close the bridge and not let any more in." That is the truth. I couldn't believe it!

[Happy Gourmand]

OK...but who gets to do the pickin' and choosin' ?

[Seaplane Pilot]

Originally Posted by The Phantom Gourmand

OK...but who gets to do the pickin' and choosin' ?

Conservatives (who want to cut back on entitlements)

[bigdog]

FYI... and I wasn't taking all the chatter personally, honest !

What I will not support for N.H.is:
- Income tax
- Sales Tax
- More Services, Welfare, etc,
- Expansion of Govt. bureaucracy, whether at the State or Local level

What I do support for N.H.:
- Lowering Property Taxes
- Downsizing of State/Count/Local Govt. agencies
- End to the Social Service hand-outs, and entitlements!
- State/Local agencies to live within their budgets, w/o raising taxes.
- Elimination of Govt. regulations which restrict our freedoms, and suppress
the expansion of private enterprise/small businesses
- Accountability from ALL our elected officials

Is this to much to ask ?

Can I stay ? It's taken me so long to arrive !

Bigdog

[Eagle]

Originally Posted by bigdog

What I do support for N.H.:
- Lowering Property Taxes
- Downsizing of State/Count/Local Govt. agencies
- End to the Social Service hand-outs, and entitlements!
- State/Local agencies to live within their budgets, w/o raising taxes.
- Elimination of Govt. regulations which restrict our freedoms, and suppress
the expansion of private enterprise/small businesses
- Accountability from ALL our elected officials

Lower property taxes are not going to happen until all the other items in your list are implemented.

And accountability from ALL our elected officials is never going to happen until they get rid of all the lobbyists in Concord.

I've gone to legislative hearings where there were 5 or 6 interested citizens in the room and the rest of the room was full of lobbyist looking out for the companies they represent. The ordinary citizen in New Hampshire doesn't have the chance of a snowball in hell of ever changing anything in this State Government.

Revolution is the only way anything will ever change.

[tis]

Originally Posted by Eagle

Lower property taxes are not going to happen until all the other items in your list are implemented.

And accountability from ALL our elected officials is never going to happen until they get rid of all the lobbyists in Concord.

I've gone to legislative hearings where there were 5 or 6 interested citizens in the room and the rest of the room was full of lobbyist looking out for the companies they represent. The ordinary citizen in New Hampshire doesn't have the chance of a snowball in hell of ever changing anything in this State Government.

Revolution is the only way anything will ever change.

You are so right about that. I had occasion to spend a lot of time in Concord going to hearings and for several of them the room was full of US trying to change the law. It went on and on, I can't tell you how many times we went to Concord and how much time it took to do so. In the end the lobbyist who happened to be from Gilmanton came up with a "law" and they accepted it. It was better than nothing but it was not really what we all wanted. I found it very interesting that the lobbyist said to them that he didn't have this problem in Gilmanton. It took a few meetings before the lobbyists showed up but I can tell you I don't have much use for them. We would have been better if they stayed away. To my knowledge noone has ever taken advantage of the new law. But at least we did something.

[bigdog]

Eagle,

You're so corect, it's going to take a Revolution by the taxpayers and voters of N.H.

I know it can be done, I saw this happen in Mass.. with the recent election of Scott Brown for Senator. Now we'll have to wait and watch what he does, and if he stands behind his campaign promises???

BTW, I carried a S.B. sign on election day down in Mass. for 2 hrs in morning stood in a snowstorm, and another 2 hrs during evening polling hrs. Nobody from the S.B. campaign hdqtrs asked me to do this, I just did it ! I felt compelled to support this effort. I was absolutely amased to see people arrive to support me and take shifts throughout the day carrying the few signs I had brought with me. Interestingly, Coakley supporters coming to the Polls were holding up one finger to me, and I don't think they were telling me I was number #1

Change can happen, and hopefully not the type of change happening in Washngton D.C. By the time they're done down there, the only change that group will leave us, will be the 'change' in out pockets !

BD

[Rattlesnake Guy]

If you get a job for $10 / hour and work all year and the state "gives" you a $4000 exclusion, at 5% you will have to pay $840/year to Concord. They are not going to pay your property tax for you so I am confused how this is going to save you money.

[Pineedles]

Apologies to Robert Frost.

Welcome to New Hampshire! I have no requirements for your residency. Enjoy your freedom in the best place in the world. I am jealous. I know my spouse will never agree to move to NH. But as I said in my vows, for better for worse, for............... and I meant it, no matter the consequences. It must be something in our DNA that draws us to this land.

[SteveA]

Originally Posted by Pineedles

Apologies to Robert Frost.

Welcome to New Hampshire! I have no requirements for your residency. Enjoy your freedom in the best place in the world. I am jealous. I know my spouse will never agree to move to NH. But as I said in my vows, for better for worse, for............... and I meant it, no matter the consequences. It must be something in our DNA that draws us to this land.

Well Said!
Frost would be proud...

Whose woods these are I think I know.
His house is in the village, though;
He will not see me stopping here
To watch his woods fill up with snow.
My little horse must think it queer
To stop without a farmhouse near
Between the woods and frozen lake
The darkest evening of the year.

He gives his harness bells a shake
To ask if there's some mistake.
The only other sound's the sweep
Of easy wind and downy flake.

The woods are lovely, dark and deep,
But I have promises to keep,
And miles to go before I sleep,
And miles to go before I sleep.
Robert Frost

Simple fact is... we are all drawn here because it is the best place in the world. I'm glad the "natives" seem to be mostly friendly.

Tax arguements are kind of fun, when you know it's safe to have them, and still respect the other posters.

[Hshag]

You found yourself a good spot. My wife and I live just up the street at Waukewan Village. We love the location. Best of all it’s just a minute to Karen and Barry’s and Famous Pizza. Don’t forget to get yourself a dump "sticka" for only 20 bucks.
Welcome, we'll toot on our way to town.

[Hshag]

Originally Posted by Hshag

You found yourself a good spot. My wife and I live just up the street at Waukewan Village. We love the location. Best of all it’s just a minute to Karen and Barry’s and Famous Pizza. Don’t forget to get yourself a dump "sticka" for only 20 bucks.
Welcome, we'll toot on our way to town.

Sorry wrong thread

[RailroadJoe]

I agree with SAMIAM BIGDOG for Governor and then PRES.

[BroadHopper]

Not only do I believe in imposing a term limit. I also believe in imposing the ethics bill in both State and federal level. I work in defense electronics for over 30 years. I had to adhere to strict ethics standards and for good reasons. To protect the American taxpayers, the ultimate customer. Yet, our representatives can not practice what they preach.

[NoRegrets]

Welcome to NH!

[SAMIAM]

BigDog...for governor

[jmen24]

A revolution is great "idea", but in reality it does not work as we would like it. Until we can vote for every seat at the same time, we will continue the cycle of voting in good hearted people only to have their views and plans altered by existing politicians. This will never change, government has created this system to protect themselves from us, the voting taxpayer.

[Happy Gourmand]

It CAN work, it's called term limits. If the lawmakers won't give it to us, then we can just do it ourselves and NOT vote for any legislator for more than 2 terms regardless of party. Term limits were instituted for the President in the mid 40's, I believe. They shouldn't have stopped there and should institute them for all of Congress. There should be no room for "lifers" who hold and give out IOU's for their votes on bills for which they nor their constituants have any interest.
I think term limits would eliminate a great deal of this type of politicking so that laws could be voted on based on their merit rather than the way they are now...earmarks and favors and IOU's
As an Independent, I have taken a personal pledge to not vote for any local, state or federal office, the seeker of which is running for a 3rd term....regardless of party.
Oh, and while we're at it, let's give the President back the LINE ITEM VETO so he/she can just strike out those earmarks and amendments to bills that cost us billions every year.

[jmen24]

Originally Posted by The Phantom Gourmand

It CAN work, it's called term limits. If the lawmakers won't give it to us, then we can just do it ourselves and NOT vote for any legislator for more than 2 terms regardless of party. Term limits were instituted for the President in the mid 40's, I believe. They shouldn't have stopped there and should institute them for all of Congress. There should be no room for "lifers" who hold and give out IOU's for their votes on bills for which they nor their constituants have any interest.
I think term limits would eliminate a great deal of this type of politicking so that laws could be voted on based on their merit rather than the way they are now...earmarks and favors and IOU's
As an Independent, I have taken a personal pledge to not vote for any local, state or federal office, the seeker of which is running for a 3rd term....regardless of party.
Oh, and while we're at it, let's give the President back the LINE ITEM VETO so he/she can just strike out those earmarks and amendments to bills that cost us billions every year.

Phantom, I agree that that would help, but in reality, who gets to vote for making the change to term limits. The government will never allow itself to lose that much control on the process. I truely would love for a revolution to happen, but unless the vote can be passed directly to the citizens on a ballot, it will likely never come to be. It is right up there with a year without a pay increase and the Easter Bunny showing up for dinner.

The human phyche is one that is based on comfort and recognition. Most people vote for a candidate for the sole reason that they recognize a name or he belongs to the same group as they. They have no idea what that person has done or is going to do. That is the fatal flaw in the general population that the government and politicians feeds upon. Look at all the people that are following Palin around like she is going to lead us to the promise land. I am far more conservative than liberal, but remain independant, so that I can choose based upon my own opinions rather than party affiliation, most folks do not operate this way. I have the opportunity to enter many peoples homes and talk with them on a more even field based on my line of work. You would not believe the number of folks (on either side) that have signs on their lawns, have not even heard what the other side has to say and they don't want too!

Phantom, I applaud you on your voting practice, you are truely helping to make things better, but an independant voter is very much in the minority when it comes to actually voting like one. I hope I am wrong, but history tells me that will not be the case.

[SIKSUKR]

The Phantom has hit the perverbial Congressmen right out of Washington! There is nothing that would straighten out the evils of politicians like term limits. Nothing.

[Happy Gourmand]

I agree....Congress will never agree to term limits for themselves.
My point is that we, as citizens, can impose term limits by NOT voting for ANY imcumbent who is seeking a 3rd term.
This would go a loooonnnnggggg ways to eliminating the Good Ol' Boys Clubs in Washington and all the way down to the local level.
If they don't want to do it, we will do it for them!

[jmen24]

Originally Posted by The Phantom Gourmand

I agree....Congress will never agree to term limits for themselves.
My point is that we, as citizens, can impose term limits by NOT voting for ANY imcumbent who is seeking a 3rd term.
This would go a loooonnnnggggg ways to eliminating the Good Ol' Boys Clubs in Washington and all the way down to the local level.
If they don't want to do it, we will do it for them!

I am with you on that! Hopefully more will follow suit.

[Rattlesnake Guy]

The logical place for us to exercise our imposed term limit is during the primary. That way we can have a reasonable choice in the general election.

Half joking, but what if we had a handicap system so the 3rd term guy had to spot the new guy 10 points.