![]() |
![]() |
|
Home | Forums | Gallery | Webcams | Blogs | YouTube Channel | Classifieds | Register | FAQ | Members List | Donate | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
|
![]()
I'm kind of new to this bizarre forum regarding the boat that hit Diamond Island, etc,etc,, I've taken the time to read back through all the comments written during (almost) the past two years and I really find it quite interesting how many of you are ready to immediately condem and how many of you are ready to condon what happened when in fact not one of you was on the boat that night and really have no idea what happened beside what you read, hear or see in the media. You're all so riteous: if it was your daughter I suppose you want blood, if on the other hand it's you daughter on trail you want acquittal. The last time I checked, in the United States OF America, according to our Constituion you are innocent until proven guilty by a jury of your peers, afetr hearing the evidence presentesd by the prosecution and the defense. I don't find it amusing that so many of you have such opinion regarding guilt or innocense when you weren't there when it happened. At the end of the day if it was your daughter, on trail, for an accident that occurred taking the life of your daughters best friend and someone whom you considered to be a great friend, as well, how would you react. Empathy, has a simple definition: Walk IN MY Shoes, before passing judgement. I've been on the Lake W for 64 years, I've been a resident since 1982, the Lake can be a nightmare, from time to time, and we all from time to time take liberties with our knowledge and experience with the lake trying to beat Mother Nature. The jury has decide Erika's fate, as it should, based upon the evidence presented. I did attend the trial, one day, so if you didn't don't sit back and second guess what was presented.
|
![]() |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to nellies For This Useful Post: | ||
BroadHopper (03-19-2010), Seadoo (03-18-2010) |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 67
Thanks: 6
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]()
nellies,
you hit the nail right on the head. I did too sit in on the trial for not 1 day but 3, and you said everything i would have said. THANKS!! |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: I'm right here!
Posts: 1,153
Thanks: 9
Thanked 102 Times in 37 Posts
|
![]()
I agree that the postings prior and during the trial we probably off the wall. But since the verdict was rendered, and since Nellies and Seadoo say they attended at least portions of the trial, please give us some insight into what happened beyond what was reported in the newspapers since that is our only source of information.
What did they get wrong/right/leave out/embelsih etc that we don't know about? |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 86
Thanks: 21
Thanked 15 Times in 9 Posts
|
![]()
I also agree with Nellies post.
I wasn’t in the court room and I really do not feel comfortable passing judgment on someone based on reading a 150 word story in the paper. Both the defense and the prosecution made their case and in the end 12 people made their decision based on the facts presented. As for the actions of this board, not too long ago, a number of people went crazy hanging out some poor guy who had his boat sink on him. Without any facts other than the fact that a boat sank they went on a rant saying what this person should have done and how much better a boater they were. Point is there are many people that have a holier than I view. |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to bigpatsfan For This Useful Post: | ||
Bear Island South (03-19-2010) |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|