Go Back   Winnipesaukee Forum > Winnipesaukee Forums > Home, Cottage or Land Maintenance
Home Forums Gallery Webcams Blogs YouTube Channel Classifieds Calendar Register FAQDonate Members List Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-16-2010, 08:16 AM   #1
tis
Senior Member
 
tis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,709
Thanks: 751
Thanked 1,455 Times in 1,012 Posts
Default

I wish we could find out the true story about geothermal. We recently checked it out and NOBODY encouraged us to put it in. It seems it is expensive to put in and VERY expensive to maintain. We were told that it doesn't work that well. We were also told about people that took it out. So we just gave up. Maybe someday it will be perfected as will solar but until then we just have to stick with oil.
tis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2010, 09:26 AM   #2
DickR
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Moultonborough
Posts: 750
Thanks: 4
Thanked 259 Times in 171 Posts
Default

It's hard to believe all the disinformation in some of the posts so far in this thread.

"Worst case is forced air. You lose 50% of your heat in the duct work and intitial heating." This statement makes no sense unless you run ductwork in an unheated crawl space or unconditioned attic, without insulation around the ductwork, and without the duct joints completely sealed. All of that represents a poorly designed and installed forced warm air system, something totally unacceptable for a new home. If all your ductwork is within the conditioned envelope of the house, none is "lost".

"You still need backup." A GSHP (ground source heat pump, aka "geothermal") doesn't need a backup system anymore than any other type of heating system. Can it break and need service? Of course, as can any other type of system.

"It seems it is expensive to put in and VERY expensive to maintain. We were told that it doesn't work that well." Installation costs vary widely. There is no "typical," just as there is no "typical" location (part of country, terrain, rural vs. suburban, etc). For a new rural house in the northeast, properly designed to be very thermally efficient, if a well must be drilled for water anyway, then installation cost may not cost much more than a fuel-fired heating system. Maintenance of a GSHP typically is less than for a fuel-fired system. Like a refrigerator, it just sits there and runs for years. If distribution is by warm air, then filters need changing periodically.

Kimdaved, the first part of your house design should focus on making it very, very thermally efficient, possibly in the superinsulated class. That costs perhaps 5% more than conventional construction. We're only talking about the outer shell, mind you. Once you have a good shell designed, then think about how to heat the place. Having a very low heat demand makes GSHP that much more attractive, as the system is that much smaller.

Warm air for distribution of the heat is convenient, efficient, and lets you reverse the heat flow to give you A/C in the hot, humid parts of the summer. There are a number of good websites out there on GSHP. Do your research well, and don't rely on heresay.

Our situation is like yours, although we are further along. Old cottage, new house design. But ours is nearing completion. Yes, it is a superinsulated design, and the heat source will be GSHP. The well had to be drilled much deeper than the heat pump needs for the expected load, so the drilling part was essentially "free."
DickR is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to DickR For This Useful Post:
acanthus (11-23-2010)
Old 11-16-2010, 04:35 PM   #3
BroadHopper
Senior Member
 
BroadHopper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Laconia NH
Posts: 5,570
Thanks: 3,206
Thanked 1,101 Times in 793 Posts
Default PSNH Consultation

PSNH will give you unbiased consultation in HVAC matters. Free of charge. Give them a call. A PSNH consultant went over the house to determine the best way to insulate the home for energy star rating. He will even recomend insulation contractors and inspect their work.

He will also give you guidelines as the best method to heat and or cool your home for this climate. Its a great service that I would recomend for anyone who wants local experience and opinion.

No. I do not work for PSNH. I am a very satified client.
__________________
Someday may never be an actual day.
BroadHopper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2010, 06:02 PM   #4
ACutAbove
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Holderness
Posts: 219
Thanks: 7
Thanked 9 Times in 8 Posts
Default

I installed a well system last yr for a client of mine at his waterfront home almost 7000 sq ft. It was a retrofit from his original oil burning system ( which we left in place for the hot water and as a back up system) Also in order to get the rebate from the CO OP you are required at that time to have a back up system. I will not go into numbers on the forum as to cost or actual savings with the system, but the pay back worked out to be about 7-8 yrs if I remember right. We also heat the indoor pool off the same system and the hot tub. The system works awesome weather it is heating in the winter or cooling in the summer. We used all quality components a have not had a problem with any of them as of now.
We also did a loop system at another house where we dug big pits and buried about 400 ft of 1 inch coils in the ground and do the heat transfer useing that method. You need to have a good amount of land to be able to do that type of system and on the water front there usually isnt enough.
If you would like to message me I would be happy to give you some info andpossiably answer some questions for you.
ACutAbove is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

This page was generated in 0.50739 seconds