![]() |
![]() |
|
Home | Forums | Gallery | Webcams | Blogs | YouTube Channel | Classifieds | Calendar | Register | FAQ | Donate | Members List | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 38
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Chase1 ,
You mention saftey and enforcement...... if I remember right part of the "saftey" on our highways involves speed LIMITS. All types of cars are welcome on all types of roads no matter their size or hp..... however they are required to ALL maintain the speed limit. Your arquement about the boat size etc is kind of silly indeed. Your welcome to drive your pretty Chase boat anywhere you like as long as you do so safely. Slowing down is part of saftey and reducing the potential of serious accidents involves slower operating speeds. My point is that if you have a boat that has hundreds and hundreds of hp way not take it to the place suited for it's speed potential? Enforcement and training ARE the most important components of improving the situation on the lake however without a speed limit as a component improved safety can't be achieved. Winni is just too crowded and small to support using boats at high speeds. Slowing folks down saves lives. End of story. I keep hearing posters say they don't see incidences of speed/close calls and I wonder how much time they really spend on the lake?? I see reckless operation involving speed all too often. Maybe it doesn't sound like a "Great Idea" to slow everyone down but I'll stick with the idea and make the sacrifice (I LOVE speed) if it means some innocent person or family doesn't get run down and killed. |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Weirs Beach
Posts: 1,966
Thanks: 80
Thanked 980 Times in 440 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
You don’t see the problem with your story do you? Let us assume for the sake of argument you were at headway speed, minding your own business. Let us also assume for arguments sake, that you are correct in that the offending boat passed by you within 40-50ft at 60+ mph. Here where it gets sticky… Question: How would a speed limit have changed your story? Answer: It would not. It really doesn’t matter how fast the offending boat was traveling, he violated the 150’ rule. If the offending boat was on plane within 150’ of you then it really doesn’t matter how fast he was going. He broke the rule! Question: What would have happened if a MP officer had witnessed this event? Answer: The offending boat should have been pulled over and cited for violating the 150’ rule as well as reckless operation because the operator was not keeping a proper lookout. (You stated: “They passed between mine and another boat while fiddling with something on or under the dash”) Question: What would have happened if a MP officer had witnessed this event and there was a speed limit? Answer: The offending boat should have been pulled over and cited for violating the 150’ rule as well as reckless operation because the operator was not keeping a proper lookout. However, unless the MP boat was in the perfect position to radar the offending boat there is no way to accurately tell how fast the offender was traveling. More than likely a speeding citation would not have been issued, and if it was, it would be easily defeated in a court of law. Question: What would have helped prevent this situation? Answer: Better boater education, (so that maybe the offending operator would be more vigilant while operating his boat) more Full Time MP Officers to provide better coverage & enforcement of existing rules on the lake. How would a speed limit mattered in this case? It didn’t. We also know that even with specialized training the MP officers receive, distance is hard to judge on water, so is speed. Your story Great Idea is unfortunately full of holes when it comes to demonstrating the need for a speed limit. It does work really well however for demonstrating the need for more full time MP officers around the lake. Woodsy |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | ||||
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 53
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Great Idea,
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
We seem to agree. Chase1 Last edited by chase1; 05-02-2005 at 10:26 PM. |
||||
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|