Go Back   Winnipesaukee Forum > Winnipesaukee Forums > Boating
Home Forums Gallery Webcams Blogs YouTube Channel Classifieds Register FAQ Members List Donate Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-03-2015, 03:42 PM   #1
caloway
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: exeter, nh
Posts: 73
Thanks: 4
Thanked 10 Times in 8 Posts
Default Time to get rid of this regulation

All it does is take rights to a public resource away from boaters and give it to a small subset of landowners. It doesn't even effectively address the purported reasons for it's existence--all it does is shuffle the activity around to someone else's dock.

We'd be better off directly addressing the issues involved rather than applying rules in a ham-fisted manner.
caloway is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to caloway For This Useful Post:
noreast (08-03-2015), Resident 2B (08-03-2015)
Old 08-03-2015, 05:24 PM   #2
tis
Senior Member
 
tis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,837
Thanks: 764
Thanked 1,474 Times in 1,029 Posts
Default

Bizer, are you saying you think the No Rafting Zone is between the two lines you have drawn?
tis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2015, 09:35 PM   #3
Rich
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Derry / Gilford
Posts: 1,247
Thanks: 74
Thanked 346 Times in 236 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tis View Post
Bizer, are you saying you think the No Rafting Zone is between the two lines you have drawn?
Could you be looking at the lat/long lines from his chart?

The NRZ is depicted by the darker blue dot-dash printed line running from the aqua colored star marked 63-2-14 to the red star marked 51-3-20.
__________________
Don't listen to me, obviously I don't understand what I'm talking about!
Let's help each other save time and money: WinniGas.com

Last edited by Rich; 08-03-2015 at 11:11 PM.
Rich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2015, 07:20 AM   #4
tis
Senior Member
 
tis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,837
Thanks: 764
Thanked 1,474 Times in 1,029 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich View Post
Could you be looking at the lat/long lines from his chart?

The NRZ is depicted by the darker blue dot-dash printed line running from the aqua colored star marked 63-2-14 to the red star marked 51-3-20.
Rich, could you somehow draw a circle where you think Bizer thinks the Zone is? If I understand where he is saying it is a place where boats seldom moor or raft.
tis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2015, 09:17 AM   #5
Bizer
Senior Member
 
Bizer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 337
Thanks: 0
Thanked 250 Times in 83 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tis View Post
Rich, could you somehow draw a circle where you think Bizer thinks the Zone is? If I understand where he is saying it is a place where boats seldom moor or raft.
There is a no-rafting zone is depicted on Bizer's chart on the northeast side of Tuftonboro Neck, west of light 15, and north of Winter Harbor Way. It is outlined with a blue dashed line. [See photo above in post #36] That was my best guess back in 1998, but that was before 2014 when I discovered that there were multiple lots with the same lot numbers on tax maps. No one has the authority to unilaterally pick which "lot 20" is the one. And since the true, on-file regulation in Concord has never been corrected, it is my best estimate that the no-rafting zone lies somewhere north of a blue Pontiac with Iowa plates. In other words, it can't be defined. Keep in mind, IANAL.

I have deleted that NRZ from my database pending a response from NHMP.
Bizer is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 08-03-2015, 11:16 PM   #6
Bizer
Senior Member
 
Bizer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 337
Thanks: 0
Thanked 250 Times in 83 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tis View Post
Bizer, are you saying you think the No Rafting Zone is between the two lines you have drawn?
Based on available knowledge now, I'd say the no-rafting zone is undefined. This regulation begs to be tested in the courts. Based on the email I received last fall, that is what it's gonna take. That Winter Harbor resident (if it's the same one) calls the MP frequently and they oblige by writing tickets. My hunch (and this is only a hunch) is that that resident was the author of this regulation and rushed it through the approval process without proofreading what he wrote.
Bizer is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Bizer For This Useful Post:
BroadHopper (08-06-2015)
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

This page was generated in 0.55910 seconds