Go Back   Winnipesaukee Forum > Winnipesaukee Forums > Diving Winnipesaukee
Home Forums Gallery Webcams Blogs YouTube Channel Classifieds Register FAQ Members List Donate Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-21-2015, 05:52 PM   #1
tis
Senior Member
 
tis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,806
Thanks: 759
Thanked 1,468 Times in 1,024 Posts
Default

That looks exactly like our raft looked. I do believe it was army surplus. I never knew it was used as a bridge by the Army though. Very interesting. We had a lot of fun with that but it was hard to get up on.
tis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2015, 07:38 PM   #2
Diver1111
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Exeter NH
Posts: 605
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,032 Times in 227 Posts
Default

Wow great pictures everyone thank you. The piks from TIS and Dave R. with are certainly as close as I could hope for as a match to what I saw on the bottom, esp. the one with the soldiers in it-nice. What I saw could easily hold large amounts of weight, and of course it would be even bigger inflated than what I filmed.

I may need to dive it again and take a closer look for any identifying marks and traits.

If any divers want to check it out and report here what they saw go here in Weirs Bay:

43 36.989N / 71 27.207W

Depth about 70 feet.

Thanks again everyone.
Diver1111 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Diver1111 For This Useful Post:
Dave R (10-22-2015), Grant (10-21-2015)
Old 10-22-2015, 08:24 AM   #3
Dave R
Senior Member
 
Dave R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,985
Thanks: 246
Thanked 744 Times in 444 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tis View Post
That looks exactly like our raft looked. I do believe it was army surplus. I never knew it was used as a bridge by the Army though. Very interesting. We had a lot of fun with that but it was hard to get up on.
This is how they were used.



Instability was moot when they were ganged together side by side.
Dave R is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Dave R For This Useful Post:
ishoot308 (10-22-2015)
Old 10-22-2015, 08:30 AM   #4
upthesaukee
Senior Member
 
upthesaukee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Alton Bay
Posts: 5,605
Blog Entries: 2
Thanks: 2,476
Thanked 1,984 Times in 1,084 Posts
Default Seeing these pictures begs the question.

Seeing these pictures makes me wonder why these pontoon bridges could not be used for temporary bridges today. If they can move tanks across them, why not today's traffic. I was always amazed by the pictures of these bridges when I was a youngster.

Thanks for posting all the pics.
__________________
I Live Here... I am always UPTHESAUKEE !!!!
upthesaukee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2015, 10:38 AM   #5
SIKSUKR
Senior Member
 
SIKSUKR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,075
Thanks: 215
Thanked 903 Times in 509 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by upthesaukee View Post
Seeing these pictures makes me wonder why these pontoon bridges could not be used for temporary bridges today. If they can move tanks across them, why not today's traffic. I was always amazed by the pictures of these bridges when I was a youngster.

Thanks for posting all the pics.
I think the biggest issue would be the load restraint.Lookslike they run 1 tank at a time.Not sure how they would control 1 car at a time traffic.
__________________
SIKSUKR
SIKSUKR is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 10-22-2015, 12:23 PM   #6
tis
Senior Member
 
tis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,806
Thanks: 759
Thanked 1,468 Times in 1,024 Posts
Default

Thanks Dave!!! I never knew that was how they were used!
tis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2015, 04:50 PM   #7
Dave R
Senior Member
 
Dave R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,985
Thanks: 246
Thanked 744 Times in 444 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by upthesaukee View Post
Seeing these pictures makes me wonder why these pontoon bridges could not be used for temporary bridges today. If they can move tanks across them, why not today's traffic. I was always amazed by the pictures of these bridges when I was a youngster.

Thanks for posting all the pics.
There are permanent floating bridges in use today. I drove on one on Interstate 90 in Washington state. It crosses Lake Washington by Seattle.

Most temporary bridge solutions are designed to not block navigation and to stay in use for months, that's why they use metal trusses and place them high. A temporary floating bridge is very temporary and has to be managed carefully as water levels change. You also need fairly flat entrances and exits for them to work with cars. The military vehicles that typically cross them are much more capable off-road than they typical American family car.
Dave R is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Dave R For This Useful Post:
Jersey Ed (10-23-2015)
Old 10-26-2015, 01:28 PM   #8
SIKSUKR
Senior Member
 
SIKSUKR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,075
Thanks: 215
Thanked 903 Times in 509 Posts
Default

Here is one I've been on several times on ski trips to British Columbia. This is in Kelowna BC. Doesnt look like a floating bridge but it is/was. (just taken out of service). Those are big concrete pontoons and this bridge had a section that raised. This was the longest floating bridge in the world when it was built in 1958.
Attached Images
 
__________________
SIKSUKR
SIKSUKR is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to SIKSUKR For This Useful Post:
trfour (10-27-2015)
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

This page was generated in 0.43002 seconds