Go Back   Winnipesaukee Forum > Winnipesaukee Forums > Restaurant Information & Reviews
Home Forums Gallery Webcams Blogs YouTube Channel Classifieds Register FAQDonate Members List Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-16-2016, 10:44 AM   #1
thinkxingu
Senior Member
 
thinkxingu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 6,327
Thanks: 1,174
Thanked 2,097 Times in 1,298 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by joey2665 View Post
I tried to leave a comment regarding their philosophy and the surcharge but the comments section of their website below the article is "closed"
Probably to avoid a political discourse. What's interesting to me is how they've phrased it--why not just say what you're going to do and why and then increase the pricing accordingly? The sales numbers would indicate consumers' feelings.

Sent from my XT1528 using Tapatalk
thinkxingu is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to thinkxingu For This Useful Post:
joey2665 (08-16-2016)
Old 08-16-2016, 10:54 AM   #2
ishoot308
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Gilford, NH / Welch Island
Posts: 6,309
Thanks: 2,407
Thanked 5,309 Times in 2,070 Posts
Default

They would have been better off simply raising the price of their wine and keeping their mouth shut about the "surcharge". It's business 101 that as labor or material prices increase so does the price of the product being sold. To call it a surcharge against their customers is simply bad business and just plain stupid.

Dan
__________________
It's Always Sunny On Welch Island!!
ishoot308 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to ishoot308 For This Useful Post:
hd333 (08-16-2016), jeffk (08-17-2016), pjard (08-16-2016), wifi (08-19-2016)
Old 08-16-2016, 11:04 AM   #3
joey2665
Senior Member
 
joey2665's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Meredith Bay & LI, NY
Posts: 3,222
Thanks: 1,219
Thanked 1,009 Times in 649 Posts
Default Agree!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by ishoot308 View Post
They would have been better off simply raising the price of their wine and keeping their mouth shut about the "surcharge". It's business 101 that as labor or material prices increase so does the price of the product being sold. To call it a surcharge against their customers is simply bad business and just plain stupid.

Dan
I whole heartedly agree. That is exactly what I was saying above.
joey2665 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to joey2665 For This Useful Post:
hd333 (08-16-2016)
Old 08-16-2016, 05:37 PM   #4
upthesaukee
Senior Member
 
upthesaukee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Alton Bay
Posts: 5,604
Blog Entries: 2
Thanks: 2,469
Thanked 1,983 Times in 1,083 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ishoot308 View Post
They would have been better off simply raising the price of their wine and keeping their mouth shut about the "surcharge". It's business 101 that as labor or material prices increase so does the price of the product being sold. To call it a surcharge against their customers is simply bad business and just plain stupid.

Dan
I agree, Dan. Raise the price. A 3.5% increase on a $20 bottle of wine raises the price to $20.70; a $40 bottle of wine goes up to $41.40 . It seems to me to be either a "feel good" change; tell the employees that they are getting a raise, and price the wine accordingly. If someone likes their product (s) , they will buy it. Just don't go public with the raises and then tell me that I can still drink their wine, as long as I pay a 3.5% surcharge for that privilege.

I live here... I am always Upthesaukee.
__________________
I Live Here... I am always UPTHESAUKEE !!!!
upthesaukee is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to upthesaukee For This Useful Post:
ishoot308 (08-16-2016), joey2665 (08-16-2016)
Old 08-16-2016, 06:38 PM   #5
ishoot308
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Gilford, NH / Welch Island
Posts: 6,309
Thanks: 2,407
Thanked 5,309 Times in 2,070 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by upthesaukee View Post
I agree, Dan. Raise the price. A 3.5% increase on a $20 bottle of wine raises the price to $20.70; a $40 bottle of wine goes up to $41.40 . It seems to me to be either a "feel good" change; tell the employees that they are getting a raise, and price the wine accordingly. If someone likes their product (s) , they will buy it. Just don't go public with the raises and then tell me that I can still drink their wine, as long as I pay a 3.5% surcharge for that privilege.

I live here... I am always Upthesaukee.
Exactly!

Dan
__________________
It's Always Sunny On Welch Island!!
ishoot308 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ishoot308 For This Useful Post:
upthesaukee (08-16-2016)
Sponsored Links
Old 08-16-2016, 08:15 PM   #6
Patiently Watching
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 184
Thanks: 2
Thanked 42 Times in 34 Posts
Default

Never have heard of this place , but certainly won't be paying a 'lazy worker premium' for what I'm sure is a substandard product...
Patiently Watching is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Patiently Watching For This Useful Post:
topwater (08-17-2016)
Old 08-16-2016, 09:59 PM   #7
garysanfran
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: San Francisco/Meredith
Posts: 1,578
Thanks: 676
Thanked 682 Times in 348 Posts
Default Living wage vs. jobs for the young...

Personally, I don't like being waited on by some loser in their 40's with 2 kids, who's skill level is minimum wage. Raising the wage not only doesn't make this person a better employee, it's taking jobs away from young people who need the entry level opportunity.

What happened to the "adult" who's making minimum wage? Many think society failed them. Many think they failed themselves.
__________________
Gary
~~~~_/) ~~~
~~~~~~~~
garysanfran is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2016, 06:01 AM   #8
Reilly
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 191
Thanks: 695
Thanked 56 Times in 40 Posts
Default Better than everyone

Quote:
Originally Posted by garysanfran View Post
Personally, I don't like being waited on by some loser in their 40's with 2 kids, who's skill level is minimum wage. Raising the wage not only doesn't make this person a better employee, it's taking jobs away from young people who need the entry level opportunity.

What happened to the "adult" who's making minimum wage? Many think society failed them. Many think they failed themselves.
I quess you feel that u are better than everyone else because maybe you make more than minimum wage ? You are not & you have no idea why anyone is working in the position they are in but they are working & not collecting free $$$ somehow. Everyone is different & Everyone is EQUAL
Reilly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2016, 08:20 AM   #9
Major
Senior Member
 
Major's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Laconia
Posts: 1,087
Thanks: 446
Thanked 1,021 Times in 427 Posts
Default Equal Opportunity

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reilly View Post
Everyone is different & Everyone is EQUAL
I agree that everyone is different. I disagree that everyone is equal. Some people are smarter, some people work harder, some people were raised under better circumstances. Nothing in life is guaranteed. Everyone should have an equal opportunity to succeed, and I think in America, we come as close to that ideal as possible.

Creating an artificial minimum wage does nothing but damage the economy. My grandparents, parents, uncles, brothers and I have owned small businesses through the years, and if forced to pay a high minimum wage, we would not have been successful. We're not multimillionaires, but successful small business owners who create entry level and working wage jobs for individuals willing to work hard.

Like many posters, I didn't need to know that Hermit Woods was increasing its minimum wage and passing this cost onto the consumers. I would have rather not known that an already pricey product is increasing. However, this is an excellent example of what happens when an artificial increase of the minimum wage occurs -- either the cost of the product goes up or less employees are asked to do more work.
Major is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2016, 09:38 AM   #10
Winnisquamer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Winnisquam
Posts: 408
Thanks: 72
Thanked 115 Times in 73 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Major View Post
I agree that everyone is different. I disagree that everyone is equal. Some people are smarter, some people work harder, some people were raised under better circumstances. Nothing in life is guaranteed. Everyone should have an equal opportunity to succeed, and I think in America, we come as close to that ideal as possible.

Creating an artificial minimum wage does nothing but damage the economy. My grandparents, parents, uncles, brothers and I have owned small businesses through the years, and if forced to pay a high minimum wage, we would not have been successful. We're not multimillionaires, but successful small business owners who create entry level and working wage jobs for individuals willing to work hard.

.
Bingo! Except I don't think everyone is given an equal opportunity anymore, with all due respect affirmative action and hiring based off of diversity is not equal for the people who don't fit those demographics. In my opinion it should be based off the best applicant regardless of anything but that's a different topic. No more asking for race, sex, or age etc on any applications.

The everyone is equal thought is a problem in today's society. I was taught you want something go work for it, nothings handed to you. And if you don't want it bad enough someone else will surely take it. Sure on a moral level we are all people and equal and all that junk, but when discussing business and pay a surgeon and a icecream scooper are not equal, and should not be compensated as equals.

As far as Hermit making a political statement, look how Chick-filet did after they made their homophobic comments a while back. In some states I could see that kind of transparency used as a marketing scheme.
Winnisquamer is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Winnisquamer For This Useful Post:
Major (08-17-2016)
Old 08-17-2016, 10:48 AM   #11
fatlazyless
Senior Member
 
fatlazyless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 8,793
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 301
Thanked 1,024 Times in 745 Posts
Default

With stores in New Hampton, Meredith, and Center Harbor, that's probably a lot of competition from the state liquor stores for the Hermit Woods store in Meredith. Believe state liquor pays about $12.25/hr for starting employees. State Liquor has a huge selection of wine at very reasonable prices, too.

Have you been in the new state liquor stores in either New Hampton or Plymouth.....both are very large! The state liquor in Ashland, at exit 24, has closed permanently......probably due to the closeness of the new huge store in Plymouth.

You know, if you do not drink adult beverages, or play any lottery games, there is absolutely nothing for you in a state liquor store, and NH has about 78 stores across the state. Maybe the state could hold mental health counseling clinics, every Monday from 2-3:30, in the back of the state liquor stores, for the rest of us who never, ever, go inside a state liquor store ...... as a secret way to build the business and create new customers.

Everyone who has no reason to go to a state liquor store ...... please raise your hand .....you know who you are.

For about $3.25, Walmart sells a 1 1/2 litre of white wine called Golden Oak or something, and I have had the same bottle in the back of the frig for about four years now......think I should use it for cleaning the stainless steel kitchen sink......ho-ho-ho-ho! .... is cheaper than stainless sink cleaner ....and tastes much better too!
__________________
... down and out, liv'n that Walmart side of the lake!

Last edited by fatlazyless; 08-17-2016 at 12:06 PM.
fatlazyless is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2016, 11:35 AM   #12
noreast
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 648
Thanks: 316
Thanked 120 Times in 93 Posts
Default

I commend them for paying the employee's as much as they can and still have a working business model, If they indeed do, but to say there is a surcharge for that is absurd. There obviously pandering, other wise they would charge what they need to charge and keep It to themselves. I guess they've chosen which 50% they are targeting.
noreast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2016, 11:52 AM   #13
Newbiesaukee
Senior Member
 
Newbiesaukee's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Coral Gables, winter; Long Island, summer
Posts: 1,355
Thanks: 950
Thanked 573 Times in 298 Posts
Default

Regardless of one's political views, in my opinion, it was a poor business decision to alienate customers by stating the "surcharge." My politics are probably a little left on some issues than most of the Forum, but I did find this policy statement a little too self-serving.

To me, it is similar to hanging a political poster. It would rarely be a good business decision even though the business has every right to do so.

And if the business is not doing so well, if it goes "belly-up" it is of little help to workers regardless of minimum wage.
__________________


"You're only young once, but you can be immature forever."
Newbiesaukee is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Newbiesaukee For This Useful Post:
Alpine girl (08-20-2016), thinkxingu (08-17-2016), WakeboardMom (08-18-2016)
Old 08-17-2016, 01:34 PM   #14
Pineedles
Senior Member
 
Pineedles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Moultonborough & CT
Posts: 2,545
Thanks: 1,072
Thanked 668 Times in 367 Posts
Default

This kinda reminds me of the VK thread and not accepting Credit Cards.
Pineedles is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Pineedles For This Useful Post:
thinkxingu (08-17-2016)
Old 08-17-2016, 05:44 PM   #15
Reilly
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 191
Thanks: 695
Thanked 56 Times in 40 Posts
Default Equal

Quote:
Originally Posted by Major View Post
I agree that everyone is different. I disagree that everyone is equal. Some people are smarter, some people work harder, some people were raised under better circumstances. Nothing in life is guaranteed. Everyone should have an equal opportunity to succeed, and I think in America, we come as close to that ideal as possible.

Creating an artificial minimum wage does nothing but damage the economy. My grandparents, parents, uncles, brothers and I have owned small businesses through the years, and if forced to pay a high minimum wage, we would not have been successful. We're not multimillionaires, but successful small business owners who create entry level and working wage jobs for individuals willing to work hard.

Like many posters, I didn't need to know that Hermit Woods was increasing its minimum wage and passing this cost onto the consumers. I would have rather not known that an already pricey product is increasing. However, this is an excellent example of what happens when an artificial increase of the minimum wage occurs -- either the cost of the product goes up or less employees are asked to do more work.
I have to agree with u fully, I know I am off base here but I was trying to make a point that the 40 year old person trying to support 2 kids should NOT be called a loser by anyone Period
Reilly is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Reilly For This Useful Post:
KPW (08-18-2016), noreast (08-18-2016), thinkxingu (08-18-2016), WakeboardMom (08-18-2016)
Old 08-17-2016, 06:56 PM   #16
topwater
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 302
Thanks: 85
Thanked 116 Times in 48 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reilly View Post
I quess you feel that u are better than everyone else because maybe you make more than minimum wage ? You are not & you have no idea why anyone is working in the position they are in but they are working & not collecting free $$$ somehow. Everyone is different & Everyone is EQUAL

NO, everyone is not equal. Get used to it, they're not. In God's eyes maybe, but in the employment field not even CLOSE.
topwater is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to topwater For This Useful Post:
Winnisquamer (08-18-2016)
Old 08-18-2016, 10:38 PM   #17
Irish mist
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 686
Thanks: 128
Thanked 85 Times in 49 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by garysanfran View Post
Personally, I don't like being waited on by some loser in their 40's with 2 kids, who's skill level is minimum wage. Raising the wage not only doesn't make this person a better employee, it's taking jobs away from young people who need the entry level opportunity.

What happened to the "adult" who's making minimum wage? Many think society failed them. Many think they failed themselves.
My late father taught me as a youth that all work is honorable. A simple, but important concept to grasp. I'm not coming down on you, but your "concern" about being served by some loser trying to make a living says more about your thought process than these individuals working for a living in whatever stage of life they find themselves in.
Irish mist is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Irish mist For This Useful Post:
Alpine girl (08-20-2016), FarmLife (08-25-2016), magicrobotmonkey (08-19-2016), noreast (08-19-2016), Reilly (08-19-2016), thinkxingu (08-19-2016), WakeboardMom (08-19-2016), Winnigirl (08-19-2016)
Old 08-19-2016, 07:38 AM   #18
tis
Senior Member
 
tis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,770
Thanks: 755
Thanked 1,462 Times in 1,018 Posts
Default

I have to say I admire anybody who WORKS for a living no matter what they make. When I keep hearing that people won't work because they can make more sitting on their butt and collecting welfare, it makes me mad. And it is so obvious that the more a company has to pay in wages or any cost of doing business for that matter, the more they are going to have to charge for their product. Who can't understand that???? Bread and hamburg used to be 5 cents a pound in the old days when the average person made 18 dollars a week. It is all relative.
tis is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to tis For This Useful Post:
Reilly (08-20-2016), Seaplane Pilot (08-19-2016)
Old 08-23-2016, 07:41 PM   #19
john60ri
Senior Member
 
john60ri's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Pawtucket RI
Posts: 146
Thanks: 1
Thanked 22 Times in 16 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ishoot308 View Post
They would have been better off simply raising the price of their wine and keeping their mouth shut about the "surcharge". It's business 101 that as labor or material prices increase so does the price of the product being sold. To call it a surcharge against their customers is simply bad business and just plain stupid.

Dan
It's "virtue signalling". They get to show everyone how virtuous they are.
john60ri is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2016, 12:12 PM   #20
FarmLife
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 6
Thanks: 8
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default Article referenced in this thread's initial post

For anyone looking to read the Laconia Daily Sun article referenced in this thread's initial post, you will find it here:
http://www.laconiadailysun.com/newsx...rs-15-per-hour

As the thread went off topic...I will take an opportunity to respond to the "people are not equal" comments with this quote:
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights..."

Words matter. I can agree that we are not all the same; but, as a very grateful American citizen I am proud we have a founding document that holds equality to be self-evident.

Cheers to good wine wherever it is found. Cheers to people making a decent living.
FarmLife is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to FarmLife For This Useful Post:
KPW (08-25-2016)
Old 08-25-2016, 01:47 PM   #21
Major
Senior Member
 
Major's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Laconia
Posts: 1,087
Thanks: 446
Thanked 1,021 Times in 427 Posts
Default Equal

Quote:
Originally Posted by FarmLife View Post
For anyone looking to read the Laconia Daily Sun article referenced in this thread's initial post, you will find it here:
http://www.laconiadailysun.com/newsx...rs-15-per-hour

As the thread went off topic...I will take an opportunity to respond to the "people are not equal" comments with this quote:
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights..."

Words matter. I can agree that we are not all the same; but, as a very grateful American citizen I am proud we have a founding document that holds equality to be self-evident.

Cheers to good wine wherever it is found. Cheers to people making a decent living.
I agree in the eyes of the Lord, all men (and women) are created equal. And in our great country, all men and women should be treated equally by their government, and have an equal opportunity to succeed (or not). As mentioned by a prior poster, I am not sure whether affirmative action, which frankly can be characterized as reverse discrimination, adheres to this principle. Notwithstanding, my point above, and that of other posters, is that there is no guarantee of equal outcome. Whether it's the BLM movement or the Occupy movement, it seems that people associated with these groups are more concerned about assuring equal outcome, not equal opportunity. I think the quote supports my (our) arguments contained within this thread. Not sure whether FarmLife thought differently.
Major is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Major For This Useful Post:
noreast (08-25-2016)
Old 08-25-2016, 02:15 PM   #22
Pineedles
Senior Member
 
Pineedles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Moultonborough & CT
Posts: 2,545
Thanks: 1,072
Thanked 668 Times in 367 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FarmLife View Post
Cheers to people making a decent living.
Have to say it FarmLife, And the hell with the people aren't?
Pineedles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2016, 03:02 PM   #23
Acrossamerica
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 239
Thanks: 0
Thanked 133 Times in 66 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pineedles View Post
Have to say it FarmLife, And the hell with the people aren't?
No one is saying to Hell with those who do not make a decent living (who gets to decide what is decent by the way?) What is said, thought and felt by many is that people who are not making a decent living look to blame others for their failures. Once out of the clutches of the public school system where a huge amount of blame (if one wishes to blame others) can be placed, it is up to the individual to make the most of the hand they have been dealt. Not everyone has the same level of energy, confidence, brain power, focus, etc. To expect either the government or the private sector to make up for individual deficiencies is a fools errand and never ends but poorly.
Acrossamerica is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Acrossamerica For This Useful Post:
NoBozo (08-25-2016)
Old 08-25-2016, 03:51 PM   #24
Pineedles
Senior Member
 
Pineedles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Moultonborough & CT
Posts: 2,545
Thanks: 1,072
Thanked 668 Times in 367 Posts
Default

I was making a joke folks. After FarmLife extols the virtue of equality he only toasts those that make a decent living. I know it was inadvertent and he wishes good cheer to all, but I thought it was funny.
Pineedles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2016, 11:05 AM   #25
Major
Senior Member
 
Major's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Laconia
Posts: 1,087
Thanks: 446
Thanked 1,021 Times in 427 Posts
Default Hermit Woods

Closing the comments option on their website speaks volumes.
Major is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Major For This Useful Post:
Reilly (08-17-2016)
Old 08-16-2016, 11:17 AM   #26
jbolty
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 666
Thanks: 321
Thanked 252 Times in 151 Posts
Default

Any business that mixes in politics risks alienating half their potential customers.

They are welcome to pay employees whatever they want and price it into the product. Personally I have a problem with any organization that presents a price then adds on fees; just tell me what it costs and I'll decide.

I guess the airlines started this with: "round trip coast to coast for $100"

plus baggage loading fee, unloading fee, drink fee, seat surcharge, landing fee and air conditioning assessment.
jbolty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2016, 12:50 AM   #27
8gv
Senior Member
 
8gv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,115
Thanks: 64
Thanked 749 Times in 483 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jbolty View Post
Any business that mixes in politics risks alienating half their potential customers.
There is wisdom in this statement.

I had to zip my lip for my entire career as an employee and then as a business owner.

Now that I am retired I am free to offend all comers!
8gv is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to 8gv For This Useful Post:
BroadHopper (08-17-2016)
Old 08-17-2016, 06:39 AM   #28
jeffk
Senior Member
 
jeffk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Center Harbor
Posts: 1,173
Thanks: 207
Thanked 437 Times in 253 Posts
Default Free Market

While my wife and I enjoy a bottle of wine through the week with our meals and the occasional wine tasting and "special" bottle of wine is enjoyed, I am not going to pay $20+ a week for a bottle of wine. There are plenty of very good wines at reasonable prices out there. Our favorite is an $8 a bottle Riesling; $416 vs. $1040 a year. I could afford it if I chose to but am very happy with the less expensive wine and have $600+ to spend on something else.

That's me. However, I suspect that many feel the same way.

The winery can price it's products however they please for whatever reason they please. The public will decide, each person by their own standards, whether their wines are worth the prices they charge.

A comparison for another food product might be Ben & Jerry's that is a very good but premium priced ice cream. They also have a strongly stated "socially conscious" philosophy. They have done well in the market. I may not agree with their programs and even got a good chuckle when food analysis showed their products were not quite as "pristine" as they would like but I love their ice cream. However, it is an occasional indulgence because of the price (and sadly the calories). There are other excellent ice creams in a variety of flavors in the market at better prices (but sadly with just as many calories). I ignore B&J's pontificating policies and occasionally enjoy their delicious ice cream. Many people who buy their products have not the slightest idea of their "philosophy" and might care less if they did.

The free market, each individual making a choice to purchase based on their own value judgements, will decide the success of B&J's and Hermit Woods. I can tell you why I make the purchase choices I do and would be interested in why others make their choices and may or may not agree with them but in the end I don't care if others make different choices. As long as I am not forced to buy expensive (or cheap for that matter) ice cream or wine for someone else, who cares.

BTW, it's a whole other matter if the government sets a $15 minimum wage that removes my choice to pay entirely.
jeffk is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to jeffk For This Useful Post:
Alpine girl (08-20-2016)
Old 08-17-2016, 06:55 AM   #29
joey2665
Senior Member
 
joey2665's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Meredith Bay & LI, NY
Posts: 3,222
Thanks: 1,219
Thanked 1,009 Times in 649 Posts
Default Missing the point

I believe you are missing the issue. Yes they absolutely have the right to charge what they want as does Ben and Jerrys but the issue here is a specific surcharge for them to pay their employees the 15.00 per hour. Ben and jerrys do not have a surcharge because they want to save a rain forest. They take their profit and do with it as the see fit whether keeping the funds or contributing to social causes.
joey2665 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to joey2665 For This Useful Post:
hd333 (08-17-2016)
Old 08-17-2016, 09:12 AM   #30
jeffk
Senior Member
 
jeffk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Center Harbor
Posts: 1,173
Thanks: 207
Thanked 437 Times in 253 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by joey2665 View Post
I believe you are missing the issue. Yes they absolutely have the right to charge what they want as does Ben and Jerrys but the issue here is a specific surcharge for them to pay their employees the 15.00 per hour. Ben and jerrys do not have a surcharge because they want to save a rain forest. They take their profit and do with it as the see fit whether keeping the funds or contributing to social causes.
The point is that Hermit Woods was transparent as to why they are raising their prices. If you disagree with the policy and price, don't shop there. B&J does it in the background by building their "social program" costs into the base price. Purchasers of either product are still paying for these programs whether you know about it or not. B&J's customers might want to put their heads in the sand about it and B&J's helps them do that by not breaking out the costs as an add-on charge. If B&J's has bumped their prices 5% to cover the cost of supporting their causes, isn't the effect the same?

For that matter, most banks, insurance companies, and other large businesses support music, plays, and lots of other local activities. Many are truly altruistic but if they don't they are not considered to be "good neighbors". They use a portion of the money I pay them to do this. I don't have a choice about it. What's the difference?

In addition, if I am a stockholder of one of these businesses, the management is taking some of the money that I should have received as returned profit and diverting it to other uses.

In short, businesses of all kinds are taking more money from us than they actually need to provide their products and using the surplus in ways they see fit. I agree that Hermit Woods doing it in such a obvious way can bug some people but the actual practice is typical for business.
jeffk is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to jeffk For This Useful Post:
FarmLife (08-25-2016)
Old 08-17-2016, 09:28 AM   #31
joey2665
Senior Member
 
joey2665's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Meredith Bay & LI, NY
Posts: 3,222
Thanks: 1,219
Thanked 1,009 Times in 649 Posts
Default Disagree in this instance

Quote:
Originally Posted by jeffk View Post
The point is that Hermit Woods was transparent as to why they are raising their prices. If you disagree with the policy and price, don't shop there. B&J does it in the background by building their "social program" costs into the base price. Purchasers of either product are still paying for these programs whether you know about it or not. B&J's customers might want to put their heads in the sand about it and B&J's helps them do that by not breaking out the costs as an add-on charge. If B&J's has bumped their prices 5% to cover the cost of supporting their causes, isn't the effect the same?

For that matter, most banks, insurance companies, and other large businesses support music, plays, and lots of other local activities. Many are truly altruistic but if they don't they are not considered to be "good neighbors". They use a portion of the money I pay them to do this. I don't have a choice about it. What's the difference?

In addition, if I am a stockholder of one of these businesses, the management is taking some of the money that I should have received as returned profit and diverting it to other uses.

In short, businesses of all kinds are taking more money from us than they actually need to provide their products and using the surplus in ways they see fit. I agree that Hermit Woods doing it in such a obvious way can bug some people but the actual practice is typical for business.

I disagree in this instance. Again what any company does with its profit is up them and their shareholders to decide. They charge a price and I choose to purchase or not purchase that product. This is a specific surcharge for a specific purpose for a normal cost of doing business, "labor" which is always included in the sale price. This transparency in my eyes is NOT true transparency but a company making a political statement and passing it along directly to the consumer
joey2665 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to joey2665 For This Useful Post:
SteveO123 (08-17-2016), topwater (08-17-2016), WakeboardMom (08-18-2016), wifi (08-19-2016)
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

This page was generated in 0.20071 seconds