![]() |
![]() |
|
Home | Forums | Gallery | Webcams | Blogs | YouTube Channel | Classifieds | Register | FAQ | Members List | Donate | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Merrimack and Welch Island
Posts: 4,441
Thanks: 1,372
Thanked 1,648 Times in 1,076 Posts
|
![]()
First, we had to deal with the noisy "drag boats". Outlawed. Remember years ago when "we" started petitioning to stop jet skis in many coves? Then jet skis got bigger and were boats and "we" passed NWZ's for coves, then large areas like Meredith Bay. Then we passed whole lake speed limits and noise restrictions. And look at the progression of NRZ and all the restrictions on anchoring that don't exist elsewhere.
Isn't it ironic that NH, Winni in particular, the LFOD state, has more rules than anybody except maybe Lake George? In "your" cove is it neighbors who are boarding? Or boaters from elsewhere? If you and maybe a couple of friends get in your canoes and go out in the cove and drop a fish line, you just created a 300' diameter NWZ. If it's outside boaters, they'll find another spot to make waves. If it's your neighbors, maybe you'll all get together and find a way to share the cove and minimize erosion. But please, no more new laws. |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Tuftonboro and Sudbury, MA
Posts: 2,441
Thanks: 1,336
Thanked 1,039 Times in 644 Posts
|
![]()
Thanks for bringing up this important issue, Dante. It's a problem even in larger bays. The erosion issue is a serious risk--more erosion means more phosphorous in the water, which leads to more plant growth, which leads to less lake for all.
Wake-setters, like extra load and extra fast boats, should be regulated. Though none of us enjoy being regulated, it's not right to let a small number of extreme boats cause disproportionate disruption. |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,177
Thanks: 664
Thanked 943 Times in 368 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Moultonborough
Posts: 844
Thanks: 260
Thanked 688 Times in 245 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Berlin, Ma / Gilford
Posts: 1,934
Thanks: 450
Thanked 605 Times in 341 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
http://www.wikihow.com/Build-a-Seawall https://www.redi-rock.com/how-to-sto...ing-walls.html http://www.dreamscapeslincoln.com/ou...taining-walls/ the end...... .
__________________
A bad day on the Big Lake (although I've never had one) - Still beats a day at the office!! |
|
![]() |
Sponsored Links |
|
![]() |
#6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Winnisquam
Posts: 408
Thanks: 72
Thanked 115 Times in 73 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Florida (Sebring & Keys), Wolfeboro
Posts: 5,971
Thanks: 2,244
Thanked 783 Times in 559 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
In my locale, I've seen only one seawall. It's possible that they're not permitted. Lakes with many seawalls cause even greater wake damage—plus wakes tend to be returned even larger. Lake of the Ozarks (LOTO) had a 26' cruiser sunk by a following wake, drowning a woman passenger. LOTO allows seawalls. Today, I watched a wake-setter boat. Its wake settled down to nothing while the boat went in a straight line. A subsequent curve in the line raised a large and curling wake that did make its way to crash ashore. .
__________________
Is it ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,075
Thanks: 215
Thanked 903 Times in 509 Posts
|
![]()
Oh boy, thats quite a jump. The suggestion in your post is that the woman died because of seawalls. Wow
![]()
__________________
SIKSUKR |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,534
Thanks: 222
Thanked 827 Times in 498 Posts
|
![]()
Surprised nobody has set this straight.
These are wakeboard/wakesurf boats, not wake-setter boats. Wake-setter is a model/series made by Malibu. |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 150
Thanks: 1
Thanked 13 Times in 11 Posts
|
![]()
For the last decade, we rented a house every summer in Blackey Cove. The house sold last year, we will miss it dearly, it's a wonderful location on the lake and I deeply envy each of you that have a home there.
In the past, the cove was/is used heavily for wakeboarding and skiing, even tubing and some of those waves were definitely impressive on their own. I stopped tubing in there myself, and try to make sure when we board I stay as much to the middle as I can (hard to do if more than one person is trying to used ). However, the last 2 years we were there, I do admit, the boats set up for wakesurfing (and I'm certain one of those boats is new, and lives in the cove) were doing a NUMBER on the boat and the dock I used. Had to adjust the dock a few times during my rental. Those setups do throw off an impressive wake, similar to some of the bigger cruisers at maximum plowing speed. If I lived in there, I'd definitely be looking at what I could do to shore up my dock, get my boat on a lift or at least some whips to protect it. I'm not sure what else you can do. While there are a fair share of 150' violations (it's a small cove...), the actual wake and how they are using the boat is not illegal. Just a sign of the times, maybe slolam skiing will become popular again and the minimal wake boats will make a resurgence. |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 298
Thanks: 14
Thanked 147 Times in 62 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Tuftonboro and Sudbury, MA
Posts: 2,441
Thanks: 1,336
Thanked 1,039 Times in 644 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Smooth, vertical seawalls are the least effective at dissipating wave energy; instead, the structures reflect wave energy seawards. Reflection creates turbulence, capable of suspending sediments (Bush et al., 2004), thus making them more susceptible to erosion. In a worst-case scenario, reflected energy can interact with incoming waves to set up a standing wave which causes intense scouring of the shoreline (French, 2001). It's those damn "standing waves"! Here's the link with pluses and minuses of seawalls and full references: http://www.climatetechwiki.org/content/seawalls |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Florida (Sebring & Keys), Wolfeboro
Posts: 5,971
Thanks: 2,244
Thanked 783 Times in 559 Posts
|
![]()
Wakesetters, Jet-Skis, and waterskiers have found that navigation controls to delineate only one-way travel works to keep wakes under control on Midwestern lakes.
Quote:
![]() From earlier observations here: https://www.winnipesaukee.com/forums...ad.php?t=10576 Most of the data deals with theory and the mathematics to support it: little can be done from real-life scenarios. A lake's wave and wake patterns are too "chaotic" for such studies. A single wake won't be returned larger from a seawall; however, multiple wakes, combined with the right wind conditions have produced some notable rogue waves. On LOTO, reports have testimony of 10 foot waves. (As does the book, "Three Centuries on Lake Winnipesaukee"). I have seen brief peaks of similar-sized wakes appearing between large speeding cruisers. You may recall my post from years ago, of having been ejected from my boat in that very circumstance. ![]() Take a catamaran sailboat and position yourself off a Lake Winnipesaukee seawall. You'll find yourself caught up in that "standing wave" condition--which is difficult for a sailboat to break out of. Winnipesaukee has an irregular shoreline: now consider the effect of the even more irregular shoreline at The Lake of The Ozarks (LOTO). While the "data" is primarily anecdotal, lake veterans of 50 years have prepared YouTube videos showing how LOTO's natural cliffs and seawalls have conspired to make the lake waters even rougher. One video shows a floating gas dock--with five pumps--being tossed around! BTW: That LOTO cruiser fatality was traced to a cruiser already having an electrical bailer problem when it was swamped from behind.
__________________
Is it ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|