![]() |
![]() |
|
Home | Forums | Gallery | Webcams | Blogs | YouTube Channel | Classifieds | Register | FAQ | Members List | Donate | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 840
Thanks: 117
Thanked 211 Times in 133 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,177
Thanks: 664
Thanked 943 Times in 368 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,028
Thanks: 603
Thanked 687 Times in 425 Posts
|
![]()
IMO Lakeport Landing Marina should have be able to buy the showroom building on 21 Elm street without it going out to bid. Somehow it should have been worked out between the city & the people who have leased it for many years.
__________________
It's never crowded along the extra mile. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Weirs Beach
Posts: 1,968
Thanks: 80
Thanked 980 Times in 440 Posts
|
![]()
I do not understand why everyone just wants to pile on with negativity.
No doubt there is some posturing going on... but this is between the City lawyers & the Lakeport's lawyers. It is very common practice between commercial landlords and businesses. Not for nothing.. but I am in agreement with Rusty on this... The city should have worked it out with Lakeport Landing. I am pretty sure Paul Blizzard would not have developed the property in question without 1st right of refusal. Nobody would spend the $$ on a new building just so that they might arbitrarily lose it in 20 years... Woodsy
__________________
The only way to eliminate ignorant behavior is through education. You can't fix stupid. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Maynard, MA & Paugus Bay
Posts: 2,585
Thanks: 756
Thanked 356 Times in 268 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Capt. of the "No Worries" |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Sponsored Links |
|
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Weirs Beach
Posts: 1,968
Thanks: 80
Thanked 980 Times in 440 Posts
|
![]()
Even with 1st refusal the city would have to "put it out to bid"... The issues is the city didn't put any real restrictions on the property. (keep the buildings, maintain taxable value etc)
It is my understanding Irwin plans to level the buildings and make the lot a parking lot for their customers.... so instead of the city collecting $8K (total assessment $358.7K) a year in taxes... the city will be lucky to get $1.5K a year. (Parcel is assessed @ $55.8K) Woodsy
__________________
The only way to eliminate ignorant behavior is through education. You can't fix stupid. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Meredith Bay & LI, NY
Posts: 3,222
Thanks: 1,219
Thanked 1,009 Times in 649 Posts
|
![]()
I have had good experiences with both businesses and purchased my last boat and store it at Irwin.
However, I do believe that Lakeport should have been given a better opportunity to keep the location and much of the disent on Lakeport has nothing to do with their business but outside factors. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Texas, Lake Ray Hubbard and NH, Long Island Winnipesaukee
Posts: 2,902
Thanks: 1,045
Thanked 897 Times in 529 Posts
|
![]()
Folks don't judge to much about is going on. There are likely more details here then are really understood, outside of those directly involved. I personally believed this was going to be a contentious mater, that would end up dragging out over time.
I do agree the ones making the money in the end will be the lawyers, and that is unfortunate.... but if that is how Irwin, Lakeport, and the City of Laconia, want to handle this, then that is the way it is going to be. Who knows what the results of this entire show are going to be. Just grab some pop-corn enjoy the show... and realize we should have been lawyers....
__________________
Life is about how much time you can spend relaxing... I do it on an island that isn't really an island..... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 85
Thanks: 34
Thanked 15 Times in 9 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Boston, MA & Laconia, NH
Posts: 150
Thanks: 17
Thanked 11 Times in 10 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Senior Member
|
![]()
This is a very well written newspaper report: http://www.unionleader.com/courts/La...court-04112018
Drove past the former Lakeport fire station a couple days ago and noticed a big, green dumpster close to the building. Sounds like it will need a big dumpster to get this trashy project completed? Maybe all parties involved can hop into dumpster, and get hauled away to the land fill instead of going to court? Last edited by fatlazyless; 04-11-2018 at 02:29 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|