|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Gallery | Webcams | Blogs | YouTube Channel | Classifieds | Register | FAQ | Members List | Donate | Today's Posts | Search |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
07-06-2018, 08:21 AM
|
#11 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,310
Thanks: 125
Thanked 473 Times in 288 Posts
|
With regard to the head-on approach question: when vessels pass closer than 150’ they both must come to “no wake” speed. I use the “no wake” term instead of headway speed because of the NH definition which is different than most jurisdictions. And no, I’m not looking to start a new tangent!
Sent from my iPhone using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app |
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Threaded Mode