![]() |
![]() |
|
Home | Forums | Gallery | Webcams | Blogs | YouTube Channel | Classifieds | Register | FAQ | Donate | Members List | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 6
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Bedford, NH; Meredith, NH
Posts: 954
Thanks: 263
Thanked 814 Times in 333 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
As the parent of a cancer survivor who had his childhood robbed from him, I do totally agree with you to be thankful for your health and to not sweat the small stuff. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to MeredithMan For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Merrimack and Welch Island
Posts: 4,382
Thanks: 1,353
Thanked 1,628 Times in 1,060 Posts
|
![]()
It seems that this question comes up when there is a property transfer, i.e. a buyer has expectations that did not cause a dispute between previous landowners/abutters. If that is correct, the new landowner should consider whether he did sufficient due diligence, or the existing landowner took advantage of the land transfer and moved his dock. My guess is, the "new" person made, or was "led" to make some assumptions that were not fully founded. These questions do not seem to arise until there is a property sale.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|