![]() |
![]() |
|
Home | Forums | Gallery | Webcams | Blogs | YouTube Channel | Classifieds | Register | FAQ | Donate | Members List | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#16 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: the left coast (Portland)and West Alton
Posts: 1,413
Thanks: 65
Thanked 259 Times in 177 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Had we not adopted the measures we did the death rate would have been much higher: when we saw it explode in Italy, for example, it ramped up the fear level. The problem with how we handled it is that there was never a coordinated dialogue among the politicians as to the bottom line issue, namely: how many American lives are we willing to lose in order to save the economy: nobody ever took a vote. Earlier projections of the death rate, had we done nothing, exceeded one million IIRC: clearly unacceptable. But 80K deaths: arguably tolerable, given the historic death rate by flu. There should be a consensus on acceptable death rate, and their isn't. One other factor that led to draconian steps was the totally helpless feeling caused by lack of a vaccine.
__________________
basking in the benign indifference of the universe |
|
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to Mr. V For This Useful Post: | ||
Chris M (05-11-2020) |
Bookmarks |
|
|