![]() |
![]() |
|
Home | Forums | Gallery | Webcams | Blogs | YouTube Channel | Classifieds | Calendar | Register | FAQ | Donate | Members List | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: CHELMSFORD, MA
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
The new condo's that are next to the Naswa are higher than they were approved for. They were approved for 1 1/2 story (loft) but instead have a permanent staircase to a bedroom upstairs. It has blocked some of the neighbors views next door. I am sure once they are up nothing will be done by the City but can the condo owner's next door file for a reduced tax rate since their view is now partially gone? Why have a planning board if they don't enforce the rules? How did a third condo become waterfront when it wasn't before? Is it who you know in this City?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 381
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]()
When space gets to be a premium, condo problems like yours no longer become isolated.
A friend bought into a 20-unit condo, which had the minimum 20 mandatory parking spaces provided by the developer. Unfortunately, each parking space was only four-feet wide! Just mayhem. Most condo problems are solved by selling out. Sad it has to be this way. You'd think New Hampshire would be different. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 150
Thanks: 0
Thanked 68 Times in 19 Posts
|
![]()
I don't care for them. They look too tall/narrow and just out of whack on such a small piece of land. Had they gone for a regular loft they would have looked a lot nicer. On the bright side...it's an improvement over the dump that was there before.
I'm trying to bite my tongue on this though. They cut down all the trees that were blocking a spectacular view of the lake that I had longed for as long as I've been alive, so that was nice. Anyways...they're built. It's too late to complain and change anything. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Weirs Beach, NH
Posts: 25
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
This is a good point. The zoning and planning process is painful but it would appear after that, you can build whatever you'd like even if it is not what you were approved for! Some friends live near the Broken Spoke Saloon and were shocked to see a second story going on the building during construction since it was only approved for one story. It seems to be no problem since they were allowed to open. Go figure.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 381
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]() Quote:
If this is a waterfront condo, and it's been there awhile, they may have violated NH's "basal tree count" rule. Properly documented, a case may be made to have the State exact a fine on them. (Or compensate you for failing to bring such a complaint to the State's attention). I'd get an attorney -- many attornies will listen to your case for free (the first visit, anyway). Sometimes all it takes is a letter from an attorney to the right party -- about $150. (But sometimes it takes as long as "your savings holds out"). Last edited by madrasahs; 05-16-2004 at 07:49 AM. Reason: Speling |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Sponsored Links |
|
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: NH
Posts: 2,689
Thanks: 33
Thanked 439 Times in 249 Posts
|
![]()
The Comprehensive Shoreland Protection Act has a loophole:
Structures ... within the natural woodland buffer shall be afforded an opening for building construction that shall be excluded when computing the percentage limitations ... So you can cut down all the trees where a building will go and immediately around the building site for construction access. This is not include in basal calculations. See section Section 483-B:9 for more info. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|