Go Back   Winnipesaukee Forum > Winnipesaukee Forums > General Discussion
Home Forums Gallery Webcams Blogs YouTube Channel Classifieds Register FAQ Members List Donate Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-09-2022, 11:57 AM   #1
fatlazyless
Senior Member
 
fatlazyless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 8,831
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 302
Thanked 1,033 Times in 752 Posts
Default

A white, one gallon Clorox bottle is the buoy to use for marking rocks below.

And, www.bizer.com ..... the Lake Winnipesaukee map maker .... will supposedly pay a cash reward for any shallow rock that is less than six feet depth .... that Bizer has "overlooked."
__________________
... down and out, liv'n that Walmart side of the lake!
fatlazyless is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2022, 12:05 PM   #2
BroadHopper
Senior Member
 
BroadHopper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Laconia NH
Posts: 5,600
Thanks: 3,237
Thanked 1,113 Times in 799 Posts
Default 150' rule

Unless it is a no-wake zone, rock hazards are not marked. Technically you shouldn't be cruising 50 feet offshore. If it is a no-wake zone, then yes it should be marked with a buoy. I see all kinds of markers around lakes.

In Mass. I visited Webster Lake. Can't recall seeing any buoys, there were tons of plastic gallon milk jugs! Locals call them 'sunken island' markers! Makes one wonder which side of the marker you should be on!
__________________
Someday may never be an actual day.
BroadHopper is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to BroadHopper For This Useful Post:
GregW11 (07-11-2022)
Old 07-09-2022, 12:18 PM   #3
Bear Guy
Senior Member
 
Bear Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: FL, Bear Is.
Posts: 185
Thanks: 47
Thanked 70 Times in 41 Posts
Default

In my experience, personally-maintained, non-standard markers are common for near-shore hazards (e.g. bleach bottles, plastic duck buoys).

I'm no expert in the law, but I find nothing prohibiting you from doing what you described, safely:
http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/...270/270-26.htm says you can't interfere with formal nav aids, nor create hazards to navigation. Section b says you also can't use haz-mat containers, unless you've neutralized them.
If you look at the regulations on swim rafts (http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/...0/270-72-d.htm) it sounds like the state is fine with the landowner adding floating objects, again, if they're not a hazard to navigation. Maybe you can even add your name to the proposed marker/float and call it a swim raft to make it expressly legal? I don't see a size definition on what constitutes a swim platform.
Bear Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Bear Guy For This Useful Post:
BeaverIslandGuy (07-09-2022)
Old 07-09-2022, 12:21 PM   #4
BeaverIslandGuy
Member
 
BeaverIslandGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: north end of lake, whenever possible
Posts: 29
Thanks: 11
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Talking Thanks for your thoughts

Quote:
Originally Posted by BroadHopper View Post
Unless it is a no-wake zone, rock hazards are not marked. Technically you shouldn't be cruising 50 feet offshore. If it is a no-wake zone, then yes it should be marked with a buoy. I see all kinds of markers around lakes.
Thanks to all whom have piped in so far. I agree that for general boating, within 150 ft to shore shallow areas, shoals, rocks, etc are not marked (in fact, I think this was part of the criteria of a navigation buoy on the lake - if less than 20 ft AND over 150 ft from shore (not including marked channels, etc), that is when Dept of Safety, through MP, would add a mark.)

My needs in the 30-50 ft range are reminders for visitors/guests coming/departing/playing near our dock, so the above milkjug/bottle idea would work well.

I was just wondering if there were any official guidance, especially if I wanted to add a more visible marker to help at night coming into the dock.

As for those uninvited “visitors” that think 15 ft is 150 ft as they blow by in their wakeboats and PWC, while I would also smirk at the below water damage of their navigational skills (and there is evidence on some of the rocks to suggest this has in fact happened), I would not mind “encouraging” them to be a little further out.
__________________
Please assume something pithy is inserted here

Last edited by BeaverIslandGuy; 07-09-2022 at 12:25 PM. Reason: Fix typos
BeaverIslandGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

This page was generated in 0.14918 seconds