![]() |
![]() |
|
Home | Forums | Gallery | Webcams | Blogs | YouTube Channel | Classifieds | Register | FAQ | Donate | Members List | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#28 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 3,469
Thanks: 3
Thanked 610 Times in 504 Posts
|
![]()
Because it is state property that runs through multiple municipal jurisdictions and involves a primary source, it will have to.
Fishing is under state jurisdictions, and may be the major fallout, but that will quickly rise up through the tax/fee schedule. A noticeable secondary fallout would be the water uptake being effected. That could be pretty costly. Also putting pressure on the tax/fee schedule. Most residents and business feel the government as the tax/fee schedule, so as that rises... they feel the governance more. |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|