![]() |
![]() |
|
Home | Forums | Gallery | Webcams | Blogs | YouTube Channel | Classifieds | Register | FAQ | Donate | Members List | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 86
Thanks: 3
Thanked 34 Times in 20 Posts
|
![]()
Bubblers that pump cold air into the Lake to move water or circulators should expose the Lake to colder temperatures, not warm the Lake. Ice acts as an insulator against the cold of winter below the ice, so anything that exposes warmer deep water to cold air should lower, not raise, the Lake temperature. In any case, the net effect of all these devices is trivial compared to the large body of water represented by the Lake.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 3,474
Thanks: 3
Thanked 610 Times in 504 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Nutrient loads are strongest near a sourcing. The blloms in various parts of the lake seem less likely to be a point source and more a dynamic of generality. Imagine that I was able to run a dye through the bubbler; you would see that right near the bubbles surfacing the dye would be vary noticeable, but as it diffused through the larger body, it would be impossible to see. The bubbler would need to be moving the nutrient load from the soil toward the surface. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|