Go Back   Winnipesaukee Forum > Winnipesaukee Forums > Boating
Home Forums Gallery Webcams Blogs YouTube Channel Classifieds Calendar Register FAQDonate Members List Today's Posts

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 02-03-2024, 08:02 PM   #21
tis
Senior Member
 
tis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,712
Thanks: 751
Thanked 1,456 Times in 1,013 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Mercier View Post
Maybe a couple reasons... PWC long ago went to 300 feet. So for larger craft with more displacement, they probably expect at least that.

Inconsequential could also mean that due to the size of Winnipesuakee, it left plenty of area to operate without even coming close to shore. Even the 500 foot proposal shows plenty of open area.

I'm not sure that's the exact word he used, but you make a good point.
tis is online now   Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

This page was generated in 0.27009 seconds