|  |  | 
| 
 | |||||||
| Home | Forums | Gallery | Webcams | Blogs | YouTube Channel | Classifieds | Register | FAQ | Members List | Donate | Today's Posts | Search | 
|  | Thread Tools | Display Modes | 
|  08-13-2024, 03:04 AM | #2 | 
| Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Florida (Sebring & Keys), Wolfeboro 
					Posts: 6,034
				 Thanks: 2,280 
		
			
				Thanked 787 Times in 563 Posts
			
		
	 |  My Vote Says Sails... 
			
			If the only purpose of the two masts was to display banners, that was an expensive decision.  The masts could have been installed with strong "barn" hinges (as commonplace in Britain) to save the costly modifications to the boathouse and its peculiar height. Although a steamship hull would be a poor sailing hull design, early steamships were slow. Particularly downwind, sails could have added a few extra horsepower when needed. ("Tall Ships" of the 1880's Gold Rush era had sails determined to produce the equivalent of 100,000 horsepower).  But unlike the flimsy masts flying banners or burgees, sailing masts would require a particularly strong mast, mast "step", a boom "vang", a "boom" and "stays". "Stays" don't appear in the photos, but the photos are taken from a distance. No stays, but I'm going with "sails" anyway. Edited to add: The "masts" (and booms) could have been used to load wood, coal, or passengers in wheelchairs. Enlarged, the photographs do show the necessary stays, vangs and shrouds for a sailing vessel.   
				__________________ Is it  "Common Sense" isn't.   Last edited by ApS; 08-17-2024 at 04:39 AM. Reason: "Stays" do appear upon enlargement...This is rigged as a sailing vessel... | 
|   |   | 
| The Following User Says Thank You to ApS For This Useful Post: | ||
| MRJS (08-13-2024)  | ||
| Bookmarks | 
| 
 | 
 |