![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Gallery | Webcams | Blogs | YouTube Channel | Classifieds | Register | FAQ | Members List | Donate | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Lakes Region
Posts: 749
Thanks: 30
Thanked 143 Times in 92 Posts
|
like a sign nailed to a tree is going to stop an illegal - oops - undocumented immigrant...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 581
Thanks: 125
Thanked 248 Times in 134 Posts
|
I've had reason to research this Current Use matter in recent weeks. The Current Use rules have always allowed landowners who put their property in Current Use to post their property with No Trespassing signs and close it to public access. The exception to this is if they applied for the 20% recreational adjustment, the landowner must allow access for the activities that Broadhopper mentioned. See attached page from the State of NH Current Use Handbook.
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Little Bear For This Useful Post: | ||
TomC (08-15-2024) | ||
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 3,578
Thanks: 3
Thanked 637 Times in 524 Posts
|
The signage should deter, and allow for enforcement, against dog-walkers, horseback riders, and bicyclist.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Jackson Pond, New Hampton
Posts: 247
Thanks: 48
Thanked 142 Times in 79 Posts
|
My understanding of the former State RSA for CU was that there could be two rates; full recreational use as mentioned above and a slightly lesser rate for those lands posted specifically against hunting. Is this still in effect?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 3,578
Thanks: 3
Thanked 637 Times in 524 Posts
|
Yes.
According to the OP, they just expanded the CU2 prohibition option... but not to affect hunting. |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 642
Thanks: 100
Thanked 228 Times in 150 Posts
|
Quote:
![]() Sent from my iPhone using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app |
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to LoveLakeLife For This Useful Post: | ||
Little Bear (08-15-2024) | ||
|
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Tuftonboro and Sudbury, MA
Posts: 2,476
Thanks: 1,361
Thanked 1,050 Times in 652 Posts
|
News flash--the border issue is to our south. If this curbs immigrants, it will be to keep them from continuing north into Canada
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Merrimack and Welch Island
Posts: 4,481
Thanks: 1,393
Thanked 1,667 Times in 1,086 Posts
|
Sounds like change without a difference...
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Descant For This Useful Post: | ||
FlyingScot (08-16-2024) | ||
|
|
#9 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Waltham Ma./Meredith NH
Posts: 4,277
Thanks: 2,321
Thanked 1,231 Times in 789 Posts
|
Is it true that if your remove your land from "current use", you have to pay back all the tax breaks you were awarded?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 3,578
Thanks: 3
Thanked 637 Times in 524 Posts
|
No.
Removal creates a penalty based on valuation - a 10% LUCT. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Moultonborough
Posts: 556
Thanks: 49
Thanked 103 Times in 78 Posts
|
A good deal of our 34 acres is in current use with recreation adjustment and also enjoy the MoBo snowmobile trail running through a part of it.
Notwithstanding: "In New Hampshire, landowners can prohibit the use of mechanized and off-highway vehicles (OHVs), such as snowmobiles and all-terrain vehicles (ATVs), on their current use property. Landowners can post their property to prohibit these activities without affecting their 20% recreation adjustment" "Landowners can also allow public use of their property for certain activities, including hunting, fishing, hiking, skiing, snowshoeing, and nature observation, as long as it doesn't harm agricultural activities or crops. If landowners open their land to all six of these activities, they receive a 20% reduction in their Current Use assessment. " "New Hampshire's Current Use Program has a one-time 10% land use change tax (LUCT) that applies when land is taken out of the program and used in a way that doesn't qualify. The tax is based on the land's market value at the time of the change, which may or may not be the selling price. The LUCT is usually assessed when the physical change occurs, and is in addition to the annual real estate tax. The owner of the land at the time of the change is responsible for paying the lien release. " Also: https://www.revenue.nh.gov/sites/g/f...ia-booklet.pdf |
|
|
|
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to longislander For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|