Go Back   Winnipesaukee Forum > Winnipesaukee Forums > General Discussion
Home Forums Gallery Webcams Blogs YouTube Channel Classifieds Register FAQ Members List Donate Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-21-2024, 12:33 PM   #1
ACME on the Broads
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 109
Thanks: 501
Thanked 106 Times in 49 Posts
Default No Big House, No Big Green Lawn, but, Big Geese Problem!

Barefootbay and TIS are right.

We have owned a small camp in Moultonborough for over 40 years. Over the last 5 years we have witnessed what used to be 2-3 geese a year swimming by to what is now with no exaggeration, 25-40 geese every day. The droppings on our property is sickening; they are aggressive and what they have done to our property is really unhealthy for everyone but, especially, for our young grandchildren.

While we don't own a big house or a lush, green lawn, I'm uncomfortable pushing the over use of fertilizer, and old, failing septic system problems without also giving the geese over population problem serious consideration.

It's now beyond the high time to deal with this issue that has grown exponentially. Losing Winnipesaukee's beauty, its quality of water, and the revenue small businesses experience around the lake would be a colossal mistake. We are all guardians of this precious natural resource for our time; hopefully, our children and grandchildren will have a similar opportunity to enjoy Winnipeaukee for many years to come. As stewards, we not let this issue go unresolved.

The Department of Environmental Services and Governor Sununu need to get serious before Winnipesauke & Cyanobacteria are synonymous with DANGER No Swimming Polluted Water become the top daily/weekly news bulletin.
ACME on the Broads is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ACME on the Broads For This Useful Post:
Hoboken (08-22-2024), tis (08-21-2024)
Old 08-21-2024, 01:02 PM   #2
barefootbay
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 394
Thanks: 77
Thanked 106 Times in 74 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ACME on the Broads View Post
Barefootbay and TIS are right.

We have owned a small camp in Moultonborough for over 40 years. Over the last 5 years we have witnessed what used to be 2-3 geese a year swimming by to what is now with no exaggeration, 25-40 geese every day. The droppings on our property is sickening; they are aggressive and what they have done to our property is really unhealthy for everyone but, especially, for our young grandchildren.

While we don't own a big house or a lush, green lawn, I'm uncomfortable pushing the over use of fertilizer, and old, failing septic system problems without also giving the geese over population problem serious consideration.

It's now beyond the high time to deal with this issue that has grown exponentially. Losing Winnipesaukee's beauty, its quality of water, and the revenue small businesses experience around the lake would be a colossal mistake. We are all guardians of this precious natural resource for our time; hopefully, our children and grandchildren will have a similar opportunity to enjoy Winnipeaukee for many years to come. As stewards, we not let this issue go unresolved.

The Department of Environmental Services and Governor Sununu need to get serious before Winnipesauke & Cyanobacteria are synonymous with DANGER No Swimming Polluted Water become the top daily/weekly news bulletin.
I’m afraid that the state won’t get proactive until the water quality in the lake starts affecting tourism which in turn means loss of revenue. I believe that day isn’t far off !
barefootbay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2024, 01:46 PM   #3
FlyingScot
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Tuftonboro and Sudbury, MA
Posts: 2,460
Thanks: 1,347
Thanked 1,047 Times in 651 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ACME on the Broads View Post
Barefootbay and TIS are right.

We have owned a small camp in Moultonborough for over 40 years. Over the last 5 years we have witnessed what used to be 2-3 geese a year swimming by to what is now with no exaggeration, 25-40 geese every day. The droppings on our property is sickening; they are aggressive and what they have done to our property is really unhealthy for everyone but, especially, for our young grandchildren.

While we don't own a big house or a lush, green lawn, I'm uncomfortable pushing the over use of fertilizer, and old, failing septic system problems without also giving the geese over population problem serious consideration.

It's now beyond the high time to deal with this issue that has grown exponentially. Losing Winnipesaukee's beauty, its quality of water, and the revenue small businesses experience around the lake would be a colossal mistake. We are all guardians of this precious natural resource for our time; hopefully, our children and grandchildren will have a similar opportunity to enjoy Winnipeaukee for many years to come. As stewards, we not let this issue go unresolved.

The Department of Environmental Services and Governor Sununu need to get serious before Winnipesauke & Cyanobacteria are synonymous with DANGER No Swimming Polluted Water become the top daily/weekly news bulletin.
This is such a bummer, so sorry to read about your experience. Do you have a broad flat waterfront? If yes, planting a row of blueberry bushes or other shrubs at the shoreline will keep the geese off your land. Just leave a 3-4' opening for swimmers.

But the geese are no reason to stop pushing against fertilizer, septic, and other issues. One problem is that there are different government bodies that handle each of them. Septic are typically town rules, fertilizer currently state, I'm pretty sure Canadian Geese are subject to an international treaty. We all have to fight all these threats at once
FlyingScot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2024, 01:59 PM   #4
Susie Cougar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Parrish, Florida
Posts: 626
Thanks: 297
Thanked 225 Times in 160 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyingScot View Post
This is such a bummer, so sorry to read about your experience. Do you have a broad flat waterfront? If yes, planting a row of blueberry bushes or other shrubs at the shoreline will keep the geese off your land. Just leave a 3-4' opening for swimmers.

But the geese are no reason to stop pushing against fertilizer, septic, and other issues. One problem is that there are different government bodies that handle each of them. Septic are typically town rules, fertilizer currently state, I'm pretty sure Canadian Geese are subject to an international treaty. We all have to fight all these threats at once
I think everyone agrees that there are several contributing factors to the lake quality. We can’t ignore any of them in favor of one. The talking has to stop and action has to begin.
Susie Cougar is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Susie Cougar For This Useful Post:
FlyingScot (08-21-2024)
Old 08-21-2024, 03:05 PM   #5
John Mercier
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 3,530
Thanks: 3
Thanked 630 Times in 518 Posts
Default

The State is septic also I believe.

But a coherent argument for change must be based on the question why certain lakes have problems and others do not?
John Mercier is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to John Mercier For This Useful Post:
ACME on the Broads (08-21-2024)
Sponsored Links
Old 08-21-2024, 05:49 PM   #6
Susie Cougar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Parrish, Florida
Posts: 626
Thanks: 297
Thanked 225 Times in 160 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Mercier View Post
The State is septic also I believe.

But a coherent argument for change must be based on the question why certain lakes have problems and others do not?
What are the restrictions that exist for Squam Lake? Are they allowed to have grass around their homes? Do the septic systems have to be checked on a regular basis? Have they banned the use of fertilizer? I’ve never heard of any geese being on Squam Lake. and I’ve never heard of Squam Lake having cyano bacteria. Do the people that live there just care more than the people on Winnepesaukee and other lakes?
Susie Cougar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2024, 06:41 PM   #7
ishoot308
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Gilford, NH / Welch Island
Posts: 6,353
Thanks: 2,419
Thanked 5,341 Times in 2,090 Posts
Default Squam

Quote:
Originally Posted by Susie Cougar View Post
What are the restrictions that exist for Squam Lake? Are they allowed to have grass around their homes? Do the septic systems have to be checked on a regular basis? Have they banned the use of fertilizer? I’ve never heard of any geese being on Squam Lake. and I’ve never heard of Squam Lake having cyano bacteria. Do the people that live there just care more than the people on Winnepesaukee and other lakes?
Actually Sue, Squam has a very serious problem of PCB contamination. The state only recommends eating no more than three meals of fish per month from that lake and that includes little Squam because of dangerously high PCB contamination. So in reality Winnipesaukee is a lot cleaner than Squam…

Dan
__________________
It's Always Sunny On Welch Island!!
ishoot308 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ishoot308 For This Useful Post:
GregW11 (08-22-2024)
Old 08-21-2024, 07:07 PM   #8
FlyingScot
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Tuftonboro and Sudbury, MA
Posts: 2,460
Thanks: 1,347
Thanked 1,047 Times in 651 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Susie Cougar View Post
What are the restrictions that exist for Squam Lake? Are they allowed to have grass around their homes? Do the septic systems have to be checked on a regular basis? Have they banned the use of fertilizer? I’ve never heard of any geese being on Squam Lake. and I’ve never heard of Squam Lake having cyano bacteria. Do the people that live there just care more than the people on Winnepesaukee and other lakes?
Quote:
Originally Posted by ishoot308 View Post
Actually Sue, Squam has a very serious problem of PCB contamination. The state only recommends eating no more than three meals of fish per month from that lake and that includes little Squam because of dangerously high PCB contamination. So in reality Winnipesaukee is a lot cleaner than Squam…

Dan
Leaving aside the specifics that could be debated endlessly, the gists of these posts are both true. The Squam community is generally more environmentally-minded than the Winnipesaukee community, but the PCB issue in Squam, not caused by the community in general, is very serious
FlyingScot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2024, 07:36 PM   #9
ishoot308
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Gilford, NH / Welch Island
Posts: 6,353
Thanks: 2,419
Thanked 5,341 Times in 2,090 Posts
Cool

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyingScot View Post
Leaving aside the specifics that could be debated endlessly, the gists of these posts are both true. The Squam community is generally more environmentally-minded than the Winnipesaukee community, but the PCB issue in Squam, not caused by the community in general, is very serious
Well, since PCB’s are completely man made and not natural to the environment and the only way water is contaminated by them is through reckless or purposeful release into the environment by man, I would say that someone in the “community” at some point caused this…

Since PCB’s have been banned since 1979, someone from the “glory days”, you know the glory days back when the water was so much cleaner…. caused this issue.

As an fyi…Squam has the highest concentration of PCB contamination than any other lake in NH. I would rather swim in Winnipesaukee than Squam any day of the week! While skin contact is most likely not harmful, any ingestion of contaminated water is not good.

Dan
__________________
It's Always Sunny On Welch Island!!

Last edited by ishoot308; 08-21-2024 at 11:45 PM.
ishoot308 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2024, 08:47 PM   #10
John Mercier
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 3,530
Thanks: 3
Thanked 630 Times in 518 Posts
Default

But is the high level of PCB's keeping the geese population down?
Why doesn't Newfound have a geese issue?
John Mercier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2024, 09:54 PM   #11
barefootbay
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 394
Thanks: 77
Thanked 106 Times in 74 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Mercier View Post
But is the high level of PCB's keeping the geese population down?
Why doesn't Newfound have a geese issue?
The amount of food obtained from a much larger population of visitors and residents not to mention the lakeside lawns for grazing around lake Winnipesaukee !
barefootbay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2024, 05:23 PM   #12
FlyingScot
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Tuftonboro and Sudbury, MA
Posts: 2,460
Thanks: 1,347
Thanked 1,047 Times in 651 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ishoot308 View Post
Well, since PCB’s are completely man made and not natural to the environment and the only way water is contaminated by them is through reckless or purposeful release into the environment by man, I would say that someone in the “community” at some point caused this…

Since PCB’s have been banned since 1979, someone from the “glory days”, you know the glory days back when the water was so much cleaner…. caused this issue.

As an fyi…Squam has the highest concentration of PCB contamination than any other lake in NH. I would rather swim in Winnipesaukee than Squam any day of the week! While skin contact is most likely not harmful, any ingestion of contaminated water is not good.

Dan
I think we agree on the central issues, so I'm confused as to why you're coming at me on this. No doubt the PCB issue was caused by one or more people in the community.

But I wrote the "community in general". I don't really count a single polluting company as as the community in general. This is similar to me not thinking of criminals as representative of the community in general.
FlyingScot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2024, 05:28 PM   #13
ishoot308
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Gilford, NH / Welch Island
Posts: 6,353
Thanks: 2,419
Thanked 5,341 Times in 2,090 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyingScot View Post
I think we agree on the central issues, so I'm confused as to why you're coming at me on this. No doubt the PCB issue was caused by one or more people in the community.

But I wrote the "community in general". I don't really count a single polluting company as as the community in general. This is similar to me not thinking of criminals as representative of the community in general.
I wasn’t coming at you and apologize if I came across that way…we are in agreement!

Dan
__________________
It's Always Sunny On Welch Island!!
ishoot308 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ishoot308 For This Useful Post:
FlyingScot (08-22-2024)
Old 08-22-2024, 08:03 PM   #14
FlyingScot
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Tuftonboro and Sudbury, MA
Posts: 2,460
Thanks: 1,347
Thanked 1,047 Times in 651 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ishoot308 View Post
I wasn’t coming at you and apologize if I came across that way…we are in agreement!

Dan
Maybe I'm too touchy on this stuff. Cheers
FlyingScot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2024, 12:53 AM   #15
Susie Cougar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Parrish, Florida
Posts: 626
Thanks: 297
Thanked 225 Times in 160 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ishoot308 View Post
Actually Sue, Squam has a very serious problem of PCB contamination. The state only recommends eating no more than three meals of fish per month from that lake and that includes little Squam because of dangerously high PCB contamination. So in reality Winnipesaukee is a lot cleaner than Squam…

Dan
Well, this is discouraging. Does anyone know if there are actually any lakes in New Hampshire that are considered clean?
Susie Cougar is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Susie Cougar For This Useful Post:
panther (08-22-2024)
Old 08-22-2024, 10:46 AM   #16
John Mercier
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 3,530
Thanks: 3
Thanked 630 Times in 518 Posts
Default

Newfound is supposed to be the cleanest.

The PCBs have been banned, but working them out of the system after it is in the system takes a lot of time and effort... effort that we just aren't willing to put forth.
John Mercier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2024, 12:19 PM   #17
Descant
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Merrimack and Welch Island
Posts: 4,462
Thanks: 1,379
Thanked 1,664 Times in 1,084 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Susie Cougar View Post
Well, this is discouraging. Does anyone know if there are actually any lakes in New Hampshire that are considered clean?
I would expect Massabesic. to be clean. As a water supply, many activities have been banned for many years. I recall, accurately I hope, an application to the Clean Drinking and Groundwater fund to assist in buying shorefront for watershed protection. This fund was started by Senator Chuck Morse in 2016 with original funding from MtBE settlement money from Exxon. It does all sorts of things from outright grants to low cost revolving loans for municipal water programs. His legislation set it up as a trust so the legislature couldn't raid the money for other purposes. We (Merrimack) got a $400K matching grant to help build filter/treatment facilities for PFAS.
Descant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2024, 01:57 PM   #18
ishoot308
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Gilford, NH / Welch Island
Posts: 6,353
Thanks: 2,419
Thanked 5,341 Times in 2,090 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Descant View Post
I would expect Massabesic. to be clean. As a water supply, many activities have been banned for many years. I recall, accurately I hope, an application to the Clean Drinking and Groundwater fund to assist in buying shorefront for watershed protection. This fund was started by Senator Chuck Morse in 2016 with original funding from MtBE settlement money from Exxon. It does all sorts of things from outright grants to low cost revolving loans for municipal water programs. His legislation set it up as a trust so the legislature couldn't raid the money for other purposes. We (Merrimack) got a $400K matching grant to help build filter/treatment facilities for PFAS.
More bad news for you…Massabesic actually has high mercury levels. This is mainly due to Tower Hill Pond which feeds into it is so polluted with Mercury that fish cannot be eaten from it. The reason for the high mercury is being downwind from the Bow power plant (coal burning) for many years before mercury filtration was in place. Actually every body of water in close proximity and southeast of the bow plant has been decimated with mercury….


Dan
__________________
It's Always Sunny On Welch Island!!
ishoot308 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2024, 03:53 PM   #19
tis
Senior Member
 
tis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,821
Thanks: 759
Thanked 1,472 Times in 1,027 Posts
Default

The Tuftonboro Old Home Week cardboard boat races at 19 Mile Bay have been cancelled because of cyanobacteria.
tis is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2024, 04:09 PM   #20
Descant
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Merrimack and Welch Island
Posts: 4,462
Thanks: 1,379
Thanked 1,664 Times in 1,084 Posts
Default disappointing

Quote:
Originally Posted by ishoot308 View Post
More bad news for you…Massabesic actually has high mercury levels. This is mainly due to Tower Hill Pond which feeds into it is so polluted with Mercury that fish cannot be eaten from it. The reason for the high mercury is being downwind from the Bow power plant (coal burning) for many years before mercury filtration was in place. Actually every body of water in close proximity and southeast of the bow plant has been decimated with mercury…
That's disappointing, Dan. Need a button for that response, sort of like the "Thanks" button. Attacking this from the other direction, are there lakes where the fish ARE OK to eat without restriction? I hope nobody starts testing lobster for impurities.
Descant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2024, 05:16 PM   #21
ishoot308
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Gilford, NH / Welch Island
Posts: 6,353
Thanks: 2,419
Thanked 5,341 Times in 2,090 Posts
Default

Oh yes there a quite a few where it’s ok to eat the fish. Stocked fish like landlocked salmon, rainbow trout, brook trout, etc , etc, are your safest bet. If your going to eat other species like perch, bass and other natural lake reproducing fish, the smaller / younger the better as the longer they are in the water the more mercury they accumulate.

I believe NHF&G has a complete list of lakes where there are issues and what the recommendations are regarding fish consumption…

Dan
__________________
It's Always Sunny On Welch Island!!
ishoot308 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ishoot308 For This Useful Post:
Descant (08-22-2024)
Old 08-23-2024, 09:02 AM   #22
ApS
Senior Member
 
ApS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Florida (Sebring & Keys), Wolfeboro
Posts: 5,998
Thanks: 2,265
Thanked 784 Times in 560 Posts
Question Back To Geese....

Quote:
Originally Posted by Susie Cougar View Post
What are the restrictions that exist for Squam Lake? Are they allowed to have grass around their homes? Do the septic systems have to be checked on a regular basis? Have they banned the use of fertilizer? I’ve never heard of any geese being on Squam Lake. and I’ve never heard of Squam Lake having cyano bacteria. Do the people that live there just care more than the people on Winnepesaukee and other lakes?
Squam Lake has the problem of too many small sailboats.

I don't recall seeing any lawns.



But wherever will Winnipesaukee's absentee landlords put their lawns?

McMansions are rented out to multiple families--some have multiple families at the same time!

I'd be curious about Squam's geese, too. We've mostly heard about the hazardous-fish-eating issue.

ApS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2024, 08:40 PM   #23
Cobaltdeadhead
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Posts: 49
Thanks: 3
Thanked 38 Times in 17 Posts
Default

State needs to ban lawns within 50' of the water unless it's municipal with no pesticides being used such as Alton Bay or Center Harbor

This is getting ridiculous. If the homeowners aren't responsible enough to do the right thing, force them to.
Cobaltdeadhead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2024, 10:41 PM   #24
John Mercier
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 3,530
Thanks: 3
Thanked 630 Times in 518 Posts
Default

The geese don't actually need it to be within 50' of water.
They like it freshly mowed. Easy to get the tender young shoots and bugs.

Same with my yard, when we mow to promote clover, the chickens next door come over and eat all the bugs... and of course leave the manure behind.
John Mercier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2024, 03:16 AM   #25
ApS
Senior Member
 
ApS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Florida (Sebring & Keys), Wolfeboro
Posts: 5,998
Thanks: 2,265
Thanked 784 Times in 560 Posts
Arrow A Good Start...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cobaltdeadhead View Post
State needs to ban lawns within 50' of the water unless it's municipal with no pesticides being used such as Alton Bay or Center Harbor

This is getting ridiculous. If the homeowners aren't responsible enough to do the right thing, force them to.
Actually, "municipal" should show the way...
ApS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2024, 05:20 AM   #26
tis
Senior Member
 
tis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,821
Thanks: 759
Thanked 1,472 Times in 1,027 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cobaltdeadhead View Post
State needs to ban lawns within 50' of the water unless it's municipal with no pesticides being used such as Alton Bay or Center Harbor

This is getting ridiculous. If the homeowners aren't responsible enough to do the right thing, force them to.
Wow! Then nobody can have a lawn because it runs off from a lot further than 50'.
tis is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2024, 11:25 AM   #27
LoveLakeLife
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 636
Thanks: 100
Thanked 227 Times in 149 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cobaltdeadhead View Post
State needs to ban lawns within 50' of the water unless it's municipal with no pesticides being used such as Alton Bay or Center Harbor

This is getting ridiculous. If the homeowners aren't responsible enough to do the right thing, force them to.
Achtung, yes, property rights be damned. Hail the Collective.


Sent from my iPhone using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
LoveLakeLife is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2024, 07:07 PM   #28
winterh
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 254
Thanks: 30
Thanked 135 Times in 62 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LoveLakeLife View Post
Achtung, yes, property rights be damned. Hail the Collective.


Sent from my iPhone using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
If your neighbor decides to dump toxic waste on his property and it seeps onto your land or the water you share would you be saying "oh well, he has property rights?" I say this as a long time libertarian who recognizes sometimes rights come into conflict
winterh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2024, 06:26 PM   #29
John Mercier
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 3,530
Thanks: 3
Thanked 630 Times in 518 Posts
Default

Run-off that would be true... and laws exist for that.
But the geese are really not quite the same.

The person establishing the lawn deals with the wildlife that it attracts... pretty much like any other landscape or feature. Think of it like a bear getting at your bird feeder or a skunk/racoon going for your garbage can.
John Mercier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2024, 07:50 PM   #30
LoveLakeLife
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 636
Thanks: 100
Thanked 227 Times in 149 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by winterh View Post
If your neighbor decides to dump toxic waste on his property and it seeps onto your land or the water you share would you be saying "oh well, he has property rights?" I say this as a long time libertarian who recognizes sometimes rights come into conflict
Yes he has property rights just like his neighbor. However in tour posited scenario he would have created a private nuisance by allowing the seepage into the neighbor’s yard and would be accountable for the damage to the neighbor’s yard. I was reacting more to the other proposal, the governmental fiat.


Sent from my iPhone using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
LoveLakeLife is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2024, 03:34 PM   #31
tis
Senior Member
 
tis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,821
Thanks: 759
Thanked 1,472 Times in 1,027 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LoveLakeLife View Post
Yes he has property rights just like his neighbor. However in tour posited scenario he would have created a private nuisance by allowing the seepage into the neighbor’s yard and would be accountable for the damage to the neighbor’s yard. I was reacting more to the other proposal, the governmental fiat.


Sent from my iPhone using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
People screaming and yelling and using the lake as a bathroom as they anchor/raft is ok despite the fact it affects people.
tis is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to tis For This Useful Post:
ApS (08-29-2024), barndoor (08-27-2024)
Old 08-27-2024, 07:22 PM   #32
barndoor
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 20
Thanks: 88
Thanked 19 Times in 6 Posts
Default

The bloom resurfaced on the northwest side of Barndoor Island this morning. Swimming is not an option as the water is truly disgusting.
barndoor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2024, 08:28 PM   #33
Mr. V
Senior Member
 
Mr. V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: the left coast (Portland)and West Alton
Posts: 1,424
Thanks: 66
Thanked 260 Times in 178 Posts
Default

I have to wonder...with these blooms recurring and being problematical, will this affect lake front property values in the future?
__________________
basking in the benign indifference of the universe
Mr. V is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2024, 07:49 PM   #34
barefootbay
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 394
Thanks: 77
Thanked 106 Times in 74 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. V View Post
I have to wonder...with these blooms recurring and being problematical, will this affect lake front property values in the future?
If people can’t recreate in and on the lake and it is a health issue as well as aesthetic . It will become a major lake front real estate issue not to mention a tourist deterrent !
barefootbay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2024, 09:05 PM   #35
SAB1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Tuftonboro
Posts: 1,251
Thanks: 193
Thanked 334 Times in 242 Posts
Default

Just saw yesterday they have found the same algae blooms in Lake Francis up in Pittsburg. I don’t think there’s many lush lawns there.
SAB1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2024, 09:13 PM   #36
barefootbay
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 394
Thanks: 77
Thanked 106 Times in 74 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SAB1 View Post
Just saw yesterday they have found the same algae blooms in Lake Francis up in Pittsburg. I don’t think there’s many lush lawns there.
Goose plague !
barefootbay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2024, 09:39 PM   #37
John Mercier
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 3,530
Thanks: 3
Thanked 630 Times in 518 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SAB1 View Post
Just saw yesterday they have found the same algae blooms in Lake Francis up in Pittsburg. I don’t think there’s many lush lawns there.
Do you have a link to the story?
I couldn't find it.
John Mercier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2024, 05:20 AM   #38
tis
Senior Member
 
tis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,821
Thanks: 759
Thanked 1,472 Times in 1,027 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SAB1 View Post
Just saw yesterday they have found the same algae blooms in Lake Francis up in Pittsburg. I don’t think there’s many lush lawns there.
It's everywhere. I heard it's even in the ocean.
tis is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2024, 09:51 AM   #39
Susie Cougar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Parrish, Florida
Posts: 626
Thanks: 297
Thanked 225 Times in 160 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tis View Post
It's everywhere. I heard it's even in the ocean.
You are right, tis. In the ocean, it is called red tide. And it is everywhere.
Susie Cougar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2024, 09:53 AM   #40
Grant
Senior Member
 
Grant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Pennsyltuckey, Tuftonboro, Moultonborough
Posts: 1,505
Thanks: 385
Thanked 232 Times in 126 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tis View Post
It's everywhere. I heard it's even in the ocean.
Correct. There's loads of it just in a teaspoon of average topsoil. And it's always been in the lake...always will. The issue is the combination of nutrient loading and temperature. The more nutrients (phosphorous and nitrogen) the more growth. So, the same nutrients used on lawns, and P leaching from septic systems, fuels the growth of blooms. Simple.
__________________
"When I die, please don't let my wife sell my dive gear for what I told her I paid for it."
Grant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2024, 03:44 PM   #41
jeffatsquam
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: moultonborough/sandwich
Posts: 187
Thanks: 173
Thanked 77 Times in 50 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. V View Post
I have to wonder...with these blooms recurring and being problematical, will this affect lake front property values in the future?
The real estate prices have skyrocketed on Squam.

I don't know of a Goose problem on Squam , but I do know of only 2 lawns
jeffatsquam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2024, 01:57 PM   #42
winterh
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 254
Thanks: 30
Thanked 135 Times in 62 Posts
Default

Although there are different opinions on the best way to address the issue the folks who read this site are obviously well informed that we have a water quality problem in the lakes region. As popular as this site may be its readers are a small minority. Makes me wonder how much the average local or even waterfront home owner is actually aware of the problem. I would think that those spending 5 million plus on waterfront homes with big green lawns would want to protect their investments.
winterh is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to winterh For This Useful Post:
DotRat (08-28-2024), welch100 (08-30-2024)
Old 08-28-2024, 02:15 PM   #43
Tyler
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 123
Thanks: 19
Thanked 9 Times in 4 Posts
Default

Randy Owen the owner of a portion of Farm Island in Tuftonboro seems to think he has the answer, check out his Facebook page. He claims he is in contact with Erin Brockovich!
Tyler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2024, 04:32 PM   #44
Mr. V
Senior Member
 
Mr. V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: the left coast (Portland)and West Alton
Posts: 1,424
Thanks: 66
Thanked 260 Times in 178 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyler View Post
Randy Owen the owner of a portion of Farm Island in Tuftonboro seems to think he has the answer, check out his Facebook page. He claims he is in contact with Erin Brockovich!
What, him again?

Mr. "I'll get you campers" guy?

Dismiss his ideas to the slag heap.
__________________
basking in the benign indifference of the universe
Mr. V is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2024, 11:37 AM   #45
erk
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 18
Thanks: 7
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyler View Post
Randy Owen the owner of a portion of Farm Island in Tuftonboro seems to think he has the answer, check out his Facebook page. He claims he is in contact with Erin Brockovich!
It would be cool to have Julia Roberts in the lake region
erk is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

This page was generated in 0.31209 seconds