![]() |
![]() |
|
Home | Forums | Gallery | Webcams | Blogs | YouTube Channel | Classifieds | Register | FAQ | Donate | Members List | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#27 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Weirs Beach
Posts: 1,966
Thanks: 80
Thanked 980 Times in 440 Posts
|
![]()
Unpopular opinion,
I get what the legislature is trying to do, and it does seem necessary. NH has long been a 'Pay to Play" State with fees for just about everything so its not surprising to see the legislature take this approach. However, I think it can be mitigated somewhat... Waterfront property owners see the most benefit from the dams, so IMHO its ok that they get hit with a fee/tax for dam maintenance. I don't think $1.60/ft is outrageous. That being said, it should apply to ALL waterfront (freshwater) properties, not just those on lakes with a dam. That should reduce the fee to approx $1/ft and raise more $$$. Boaters absolutely benefit, I have no problem paying this fee/tax. Fishermen also benefit, so again IMHO its ok to hit them with a $2 surcharge on their fishing license... Kayakers benefit and have long skated under the radar... Kayaks should have to buy an annual sticker say $10, that goes to F&G, MP & dam fund. Nobody wants to give the government any more money, but in this instance it may be warranted. Woodsy
__________________
The only way to eliminate ignorant behavior is through education. You can't fix stupid. |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to Woodsy For This Useful Post: | ||
MRD (02-09-2025) |
Bookmarks |
|
|