![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Gallery | Webcams | Blogs | YouTube Channel | Classifieds | Register | FAQ | Members List | Donate | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: phoenix and moultonboro
Posts: 1,605
Thanks: 67
Thanked 293 Times in 207 Posts
|
did selectmen set the tax rate last night?
__________________
it's tough to make predictions specially about the future |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Merrimack and Welch Island
Posts: 4,656
Thanks: 1,448
Thanked 1,733 Times in 1,127 Posts
|
NH Dept of Revenue Administration (DRA) sets the tax rate, not BOS. I don't see M'boro on the list yet.
https://www.revenue.nh.gov/sites/g/f...-tax-rates.pdf |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Moultonborough
Posts: 589
Thanks: 56
Thanked 110 Times in 83 Posts
|
The video of the meeting mentioned that the rate went from 5.33 to 5.17
A .16 reduction in total rate. |
|
|
|
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to longislander For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: phoenix and moultonboro
Posts: 1,605
Thanks: 67
Thanked 293 Times in 207 Posts
|
there was a motion to use excess reserves to lower the tax rate but was rejected by 3-1 vote
__________________
it's tough to make predictions specially about the future |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Moultonborough
Posts: 589
Thanks: 56
Thanked 110 Times in 83 Posts
|
Chairman Quinlan stated that the meeting had been convened on short notice for the purpose of determining whether any unassigned fund balance should be used to reduce the 2026 tax rate.
https://www.moultonboroughnh.gov/Age..._11052026-1119 After viewing the video, an email was sent to the BoS, town adminstrator, and town finance director. There is concern not only about the Policy #32 of 12.5% of unassignesd funds, but also the potential increase of capital reserves via the CIPC. They both put taxpayer money (already paid) aside for future use by the town. Part of the email: "Capital reserves and using unassigned funds for capital spending on warrant articles, affect decisions on acquisitions etc. If there is to be "enough money" in capital reserves, how is that going to affect "enough" unassigned funds balance? How much is enough in reserves? Shouldn't that be reflected in unassigned funds? Unassigned Funds under policy #32 are a flat 12.5% of the gross appropriations. Are reserve money appropriations for ten/twenty year plans to be flat, yearly increasing, yearly decreasing ...eliminated at some point? When is the legislative body addressed for appropriation? If there is a ten or twenty year plan (?) ... has the town or school district voted and agreed? There can be ...town/school district NO! votes ...notwithstanding votes by boards." Also, https://www.moultonboroughnh.gov/Arc...wFile/Item/103 Last edited by longislander; 11-10-2026 at 12:07 PM. Reason: addendum |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Moultonborough
Posts: 589
Thanks: 56
Thanked 110 Times in 83 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 244
Thanks: 1
Thanked 41 Times in 28 Posts
|
What good is posting just the tax rate comparison from this year to next year without the appraised tax base of homes. If the rate goes down by some 10% but the appraised home values goes up to 50% - what's there to cerebrate? IF the appraised tax based stayed the same then kudos to the town for fiscal success. The rate by itself showing a decrease seems borderline useless without the other numbers, no?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 4,157
Thanks: 3
Thanked 701 Times in 580 Posts
|
Is the information that you are looking for at the bottom of the document?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Center Harbor
Posts: 1,281
Thanks: 220
Thanked 505 Times in 294 Posts
|
Moultonborough tax bills increased, ON AVERAGE, about 3%, about what inflation runs.
Individual bills will vary based on whether the individual assessment exceeded the average 5.81% increase in town valuation. often, it is the more rapid increase of waterfront value that jacks up tax bills on those houses instead of changes in town spending. |
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to jeffk For This Useful Post: | ||
VitaBene (Today) | ||
|
|
#10 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Tuftonboro and Sudbury, MA
Posts: 2,620
Thanks: 1,458
Thanked 1,088 Times in 679 Posts
|
Quote:
And for non waterfront owners--you're being subsidized by the part timers who don't even get to vote |
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to FlyingScot For This Useful Post: | ||
phoenix (Yesterday) | ||
|
|
#11 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 244
Thanks: 1
Thanked 41 Times in 28 Posts
|
Quote:
So tax rate was lowered by 2.8% while total assessed net valuation increased by 5.81%. Taking out individual home circumstances, that yields the average 3.01% that you are all talking about. We don't live in Moultonborough but if we did, while not thrilled with any increase > all things considered they look like they did a decent job managing the finances. Will be interesting to see how the other lakes region towns do as a comparison. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 516
Thanks: 5
Thanked 179 Times in 92 Posts
|
Bought in 1997 on the lake and assessment has gome from original price of about $700K to present assessment of over $4M. I have no complaints about what I pay in taxes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Moultonborough
Posts: 3,648
Thanks: 1,747
Thanked 1,664 Times in 862 Posts
|
Anyone complaining about taxes in Moultonborough has not lived anywhere else in NH or New England!
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|