Go Back   Winnipesaukee Forum > Winnipesaukee Forums > General Discussion
Home Forums Gallery Webcams Blogs YouTube Channel Classifieds Register FAQ Members List Donate Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-26-2007, 08:28 AM   #1
wifi
Senior Member
 
wifi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Lakes Region
Posts: 1,321
Thanks: 282
Thanked 287 Times in 169 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lucky2Bhere
Question?.....For a state with so many vacation home owners what are the options besides property or sales tax. Should a relatively small group of permanent residents shoulder the load with an income tax? ......
Here is how one state, with many winter homes and lots of non resident traffic handled it:
http://www.pbcgov.com/papa/Exemption.htm
http://www.pbcgov.com/papa/SaveOurHomes.htm

Interesting concept, they have been doing it for 12 years.
wifi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2007, 10:06 AM   #2
ITD
Senior Member
 
ITD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Moultonboro, NH
Posts: 2,939
Thanks: 481
Thanked 695 Times in 390 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wifi
Here is how one state, with many winter homes and lots of non resident traffic handled it:
http://www.pbcgov.com/papa/Exemption.htm
http://www.pbcgov.com/papa/SaveOurHomes.htm

Interesting concept, they have been doing it for 12 years.
I think a cap on property value increases is not the way to do it. ( Hopefully I read the link right.) If a property is underassessed it should be fixed quickly when found. Everybody should pay their fair share, and in property tax that fair share is base on the assessed value of your property which is base on what you could sell it for. A cap on property value increases does not address the problem which is politicians wasting your money. A cap on the tax levy addresses this problem nicely. The politicians need to ask permission to spend outside of their means (which is the tax levy). The voters can say no. It's a nice system that makes pols a little more honest although it is not perfect.
ITD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2007, 01:34 PM   #3
Irish mist
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 686
Thanks: 128
Thanked 85 Times in 49 Posts
Default

Airwaves when you can name ONE state in the nation where an income tax, or extra tax, lowered property taxes over the long run I'll take you serisouly.......until then you are just blowing smoke.
________
MEXICO CITY HOTELS

Last edited by Irish mist; 02-27-2011 at 10:56 PM.
Irish mist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2007, 03:30 PM   #4
Airwaves
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: I'm right here!
Posts: 1,153
Thanks: 9
Thanked 102 Times in 37 Posts
Default

Irish Mist
I don't believe I said an income tax WOULD lower property tax. I said it would benefit the state you actually live in and could:
Quote:
address issues either not being addressed now, or could allow local communities to reduce property taxes. That's where the voter comes in.
Note that last line...THAT'S WHERE THE VOTER COMES IN...That means elect folks that will do what you would like seen done. Perhaps lower property taxes, perhaps pay for kindergarten, whatever you want. That's what voting is for.

Don't vote then don't complain about how your tax money is spent.

In the meantime NH residents paying out of state income tax to Massachusetts benefits me, not you
Airwaves is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

This page was generated in 0.11914 seconds